Brand New! Picture of Apollo 11 site taken from space.

0 votes

I thought I would alert you guys, since it's a topic tossed around here.
This is a brand spanking new photo of the Apollo 11 site, including the lander. It's really slow to load. I imagine people are inundating the site right now. See if you can find the lander! I haven't found it yet, it's so slow to load..

These were imaged by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter on July 12th, last week.

Who can find it first?
Apollo 11 image
http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse/view/nacr00000ada

Main image browser page.
http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Check out shadows in the new moon landing pictures.

Do they seem to be VERY LONG shadows in comparison to the crater shadows, which are very large crates in some pictures? Why? I've been keeping my options open on this issue. The ratio of the shadows cast seems out of proportion.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/a...

Of course

The shadow inside the crater can never be larger than the crater, but the cast shadow of an upright object can be very long when the light is low on the horizon.

Ah found it!

If you're using the image browser, It's a little above the middle of the entire strip., And a little to the left. Use the other image I posted for context.
It shouldn't take you long.

"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k

The thing that I can't get my mind around ?

Is our penetration of the Van Allan Belts. Not one of these astronauts has developed cancer ? The radiation is tremendous, not to mention the radiation on the surface of the moon ? It's not so much the heat/cold it's the radiation and literally everything is done in full sun ? My money is on a full scale production of a lunar landing movie. This allows the elite who own NASA to keep nearly all the $Billions they saved from actually paying for a REAL ATTEMPT AT KILLING ASTRONAUTS WITH RADIATION GOING TO THE MOON. Ever wonder why it is we've never been back ? Wake up !!! The people that own the country WITH MONEY STOLEN FROM YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES ARE CRIMINALS AND LIVE THE LIES.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

Risky business

All Apollo astronauts developed cataracts within 4-10 years, but I know of no other health issues that could be attributed to the radiation exposure they received. This is even questionable on the cause.

What did you think? http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/ap...

Radiation is a concern for all spaceflight, manned and unmanned. The doses were estimated for Apollo from earlier spacecraft and were known, typically non-lethal, but hazardous. A solar storm could have been deadly.

One crew, I can't recall which one, experienced ionizing radiation induced visual stimulation - called phosphenes. Rather intense from the records I had read.

Here is a good Van Allen belt and general radiation danger summary. http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/books/apollo/S2ch3.htm

Here is a broad article on the issue of space radiation with good Apollo references.

http://klabs.org/richcontent/Tutorial/radiation/space_rad_he...

My earliest formal space research was in 1983 concerning ionizing radiation and spaceflight. I am not an expert on the subject, but I feel I can contribute a bit here.

Here is a section of the big photo

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/369440main_lroc_apollo11_...

I still haven't found it on the big image. But there is some context here that might help you if you still want to locate it yourself. happy hunting.

Keep in mind that as the orbit is adjusted, the resolution will get better.
The Shot of Apollo 14's site even shows pathways of footprints as they set up equipment.

"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k

Dial up friendly

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/ap...

Shadows are spot on.

What happened to the Q channel in 8VSB? It is a government conspiracy I tell ya.

OK you guys. Anyone care to explain

Why Armstrong flubbed his line "One small step..." in front of billions of people? Presumably, if the landing were staged, they would have done a re-shoot of the most significant event of the 20th century (One where Armstrong got it right: "One small step for A man.....)"

The audio was live of them

The audio was live of them in the cabin. This is why they were walking around on the moon while talking about irrellevant stuff.

The new is the Daily Paul.

Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul

Right.......they risked a live performance

rather than filming the entire thing in advance.

Has anyone found it? What

Has anyone found it? I looked for a while, but came up empty. What part of the picture is it in? How high resolution is required to see it?

Look for a shadow that goes in the opposite direction from most of the others.

Where's Waldo?

Why in the h@!! didn't they put an arrow where it is?

More Fake Photos?

Here are the Apollo landing site photos. If you look close you will see the shadows of the landers are projecting in the OPPOSITE direction from crater shadows. Or am I seeing things???

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/a...

the pictures may be fake

but I don't think the shadows are opposite. The shadow from the object is to the right, meaning the light source is left. The shadows IN the craters (craters are depressions not protrusions) is to the left..that seems consistent to me.

Miamisburg, Montgomery County, Ohio

dalesvp: You are so correct! These are not even good..

fakes. You are not seeing things, unfortunately. You would think that they would at least get the shadows right, and even if they were correct, I wasn't very impressed. These pictures do nothing for me.

Here is a site

that Oruval brought forward. It is not my first choice to make my case, but it shows some interesting discrepancies.

http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/28159
I will provide further details, if there is interest.
★★★★★★
http://www.documentarywire.com/
http://freedocumentaries.net/c/All/

Jeff: Great link to further ponder such blatant....

discrepancies. Are there any links that go through these "new" pictures? I haven't found any yet. Have you?

The lander protrudes. The

The lander protrudes. The other artifacts are craters. Lumps and divots have shadows on opposite sides.

No, Dalesvp, you're not "seeing things"

These photos don't prove anything. It is just more fluffed up BS, from NASA, and the Govt. trying to rally the sheeple around the 40th Anniversary of the largest hoax played on the world.

Here they are pretending to be far away from Earth, by placing a transparency over the window to make the Earth look like a small blue marble. When they take the transparency off, sunlight fills the capsule, and you can see that they are in low Earth orbit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vrge-8F6rw&feature=related

★★★★★★
http://www.documentarywire.com/
http://freedocumentaries.net/c/All/

That is a very

Compelling video. I might have to send it to my people. Very compelling indeed.

You're being sarcastic right?

because if you aren't, there is a distinct possibility that hell is freezing over, this very moment.

★★★★★★
http://www.documentarywire.com/
http://freedocumentaries.net/c/All/

If

Someone presents an debatable subject with facts and video to back-up their claims is it not logical to find said things in the right.

I am not illogical. I am a critical thinker. You may start to see the method to some of my madness. Yes the video provided only backs up my analysis of the moon landing con. Thank you for providing more concrete to set my gut feelings into stone.

Jefferson, for all the flack you got about your thread...

I don't remember the complainers actually addressing this deception you mention here.

yep, no way we made it to

yep, no way we made it to space. cellphones, and gps navigators, and satalite radio all work because of magic.

Hello, straw man argument.

No one said anything about the magical properties of cell phones, gps and satalite radio.

All of which didn't exist at the time that the calculator sized processsor on the moon lander managed to navigate its way to the moon.

Your argument is like say look, there are two big holes in the ground at ground zero, so the governments account must be accurate because there are holes.

Try harder next time, k?

Aku Soku Zan

Aku Soku Zan

From abovetopsecret.com

Has anyone ever seen a documentary made by some Spanish dude, called Juan José Benítez about 'Mirlo Rojo'?

Well it was aired slightly more than a year ago on Spanish TV.
After that episode, the documentary series was cancelled and all Videos and documents related to this program were immediately seized from TVE and the people related..

I am sure many of you have not seen it, so I have posted a few videos, and I’m going to tell you a bit about this episode (It’s a quick summary):

Firstly I would like to say that the episode is called 'Mirlo Rojo' as this information was directly handed to Benitéz from an official government employee who would like to go by the name of 'Mirlo Rojo'. That said, let’s move on. =)

The episode talks about the first ever successful mission to the moon, Apollo 11. Moving on; it tells us some of the reasons for this mission to the Moon, and the rivalry with Russia to reach the moon first.

Nasa had previously sent non-manned missions (satellites) to the moon and apparently had seen strange phenomenon’s on the moon. These 2 missions were to retrieve thousands and thousands of pictures from the moons landscape for various reasons.
Some of the pictures which were taken by the satellites had shown unusual landscapes of a building and other monuments. This immediately became top secret information.

Anyway, as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin approached the moon, they made the famous comment about seeing a UFO through the shuttle, which can be easily found on the internet.
As they arrived, they walked around, took some pictures, made a quick video about ‘small step for mankind, etc...’, and then proceeded to the real objective to the mission.

To reach the apparent base which was pictured by one of the satellites.
When they arrived at these ruins, the heart rate of Neil increased to the famous 140+, which was argued my many sceptics, saying that they were putting to much strain carrying material from the moon (Benitéz actually says that the weight of the objects carried on the moon at one time relative on earth were about ‘2kg’.
*Unless you have never moved from the incubator, and have never moved a muscle, I believe carrying 2kg for 6 metres does not increase your heart rate to 140+. (Also remember these astronauts are trained to work under such conditions)*

So they continued collecting samples, pictures, and the rest.
(Apparently at the horizon of the moon they could see a UFO, and then another, and another to the left, etc.. which seemed to have gathered around. Buzz saying, “Their real, wow, on the left, another on the right. What the hell is that, Its impossible, its incredible”)

What they saw on the moon was similar to the link to the picture I posted below.
A hangar.
Nothing could have prepared the astronauts for this type of mission.

They quickly got back on the shuttle and returned to Earth.
Midway through the journey, Buzz who was in control of the shuttle, saw what appeared to be a similar UFO on his right hand side. (This was also all recorded by radar and their instrument panels).
As they were approaching Earth, the UFO apparently came very close to the shuttle, causing concern for danger. Buzz’s heart rate by then was over 180 and had entered a state of shock. Neil had to remove him from the controls and take over.

Nonetheless, they managed to land successfully.

After the Apollo 11 mission a few more missions to the moon continued (Apollo 12-17), but the last of these were only to remove all traces of possible extraterrestrial life on the moon, by using nuclear weapons.
(I heard this from some other source, which said the US government had been able to make contact with the extraterrestrial life, which told them never to return to the moon again.)
Notice why there hasn’t been any mission to the Moon in over 30 years.
(Furthermore, the US government, Russia and China have now confirmed there will be another moon landing by the end of 2020.)

After flight Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong was interviewed and asked a few questions by Benitéz himself. Armstrong replying he could not comment as it was strictly confidential information.

This conspiracy has never really been suggested, and has remained top secret ever since.

There’s a few things I did not mention, as the article is long enough already.
You might be able to download this video through a few sites, it is well worth a look.
Some of the footage is incredible.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread190155/pg1

If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!

Yahoo and Barnes and Noble Moonlanding ANNIVERSARY!!! yipee!!!

I find it interesting that the past few days on YAHOO News Feed they were pumping all sorts of stories regarding the new and updated moon photos. How Hollywood has come to NASA's rescue to help restore the photos - the stories relayed that they were not new photos just better. The stories also reported that NASA didn't have a recording of the televised news footage of the landing. Apparently someone had recorded it, but NASA being a frugal place taped over the original recording. Naturally, Barnes and Nobel is featuring all the newly released Moon Landing books and calendars as well.

Knowing now what I know about how all the various media works together to promote ideas, it is almost comical.

Especially if even a fraction of what you are talking about here is true.

Well, it IS the 40th Anniversary

Isn't it normal to mark milestones?

"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k

File is 100MB

So be patient.