Ron Paul: Healthcare is a Good, Not a Right

0 votes

By Ron Paul | Texas Straight Talk
July 20, 2009

http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Political philosopher Richard Weaver famously and correctly stated that ideas have consequences. Take for example ideas about rights versus goods. Natural law states that people have rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A good is something you work for and earn. It might be a need, like food, but more “goods” seem to be becoming “rights” in our culture, and this has troubling consequences. It might seem harmless enough to decide that people have a right to things like education, employment, housing or healthcare. But if we look a little further into the consequences, we can see that the workings of the community and economy are thrown wildly off balance when people accept those ideas.

First of all, other people must pay for things like healthcare. Those people have bills to pay and families to support, just as you do. If there is a “right” to healthcare, you must force the providers of those goods, or others, to serve you.

Obviously, if healthcare providers were suddenly considered outright slaves to healthcare consumers, our medical schools would quickly empty. As the government continues to convince us that healthcare is a right instead of a good, it also very generously agrees to step in as middle man. Politicians can be very good at making it sound as if healthcare will be free for everybody. Nothing could be further from the truth. The administration doesn’t want you to think too much about how hospitals will be funded, or how you will somehow get something for nothing in the healthcare arena. We are asked to just trust the politicians. Somehow it will all work out.

Universal Healthcare never quite works out the way the people are led to believe before implementing it. Citizens in countries with nationalized healthcare never would have accepted this system had they known upfront about the rationing of care and the long lines.

As bureaucrats take over medicine, costs go up and quality goes down because doctors spend more and more of their time on paperwork and less time helping patients. As costs skyrocket, as they always do when inefficient bureaucrats take the reins, government will need to confiscate more and more money from an already foundering economy to somehow pay the bills. As we have seen many times, the more money and power that government has, the more power it will abuse. The frightening aspect of all this is that cutting costs, which they will inevitably do, could very well mean denying vital services. And since participation will be mandatory, no legal alternatives will be available.

The government will be paying the bills, forcing doctors and hospitals to dance more and more to the government’s tune. Having to subject our health to this bureaucratic insanity and mismanagement is possibly the biggest danger we face. The great irony is that in turning the good of healthcare into a right, your life and liberty are put in jeopardy.
Instead of further removing healthcare from the market, we should return to a true free market in healthcare, one that empowers individuals, not bureaucrats, with control of healthcare dollars. My bill HR 1495 the Comprehensive Healthcare Reform Act provides tax credits and medical savings accounts designed to do just that.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ron Paul

just puts it together so eloquently.

guns = a right = you have

guns = a right = you have the right to buy them

health care = a right = you have the right to buy it

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.

Even the Dailykos agrees

Even the Dailykos agrees with Ron Paul:

"Poll

Should heath care be treated as..

A basic right of society independent of wealth?
36%

Goods for sale to those who can afford it?
56%

Blackberry cobbler (YUM!)
6%"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/7/21/755905/-Ron-Pauls-Li...

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.

Looking at it another way...

We see that the government run health care will cost more, deny services needed or desired, and simply become less capable of developing greater technologies to battle man's illnesses. The other way I fearfully look at this is the government "mandating" treatments upon the people. What if the government deems it essential that you receive a certain treatment to "help save costs"? Or, what if everyone is required to participate in the "preventative program" to ward off future "potential" medical problems for the sake of costs? Wouldn't that next step be to deny you any services until you have complied to all the required treatments first? You first have to take your unwanted medicine, get checked off and then and only then may you now get that broken arm fixed. I really don't see national health care as being a user friendly system for a free people. Barring all of the ills of the idea, it is simply unconstitutional!

The night is far spent, the day is at hand.
And those who have not heard shall understand.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand.
And those who have not heard shall understand.

Bump to our beautiful SCButterfly,

Thanks for posting this
------
Libera me......from this dark dream, to the life-stream! --Leslie Phillips
The most terrifying words in the English language are: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help!"-- Ronald Reagan

But that man should play the tyrant over God, and find Him a better man than himself, is astonishing drama indeed!~~D. Sayers

There is no difference between an authoritarian government from the right or the left...F. A.Schaeffer

Here's a Butterfly

bump! :o)

Good Commentary, Right Answer?

I was looking over bill HR 1495 today and trying to make out the lingo. My issue with this bill is that it attempts to amend the IRS code and includes several references to key clauses and sections that the average person probably won't understand.

My question to you all is, would you rather see health reform that you can understand at first glance or one as intricate as Paul has proposed where many of us will have to go off blind faith that it will work having very little knowledge or time, like our representatives, to read and comprehend it?

Watch over 400 Activist-Issue Films Online, www.filmsforaction.org

www.youthforronpaul.com
www.yaliberty.org - Young Americans for Liberty
www.ivaw.org/operation-recovery - Stop Deploying Traumatized Troops