Jaynee Germond for US Congress Oregon District 4

0 votes

I'm in Texas and just received this e-mail, and donated $10. Thought I would pass it along to see if anyone else wanted to help. She's just trying ti raise $3000. Do some due dilligence and see what you think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WE the people need to Take Back our Country! Please join us to regain our liberty, 07/23/09!

If we all send just $10 we can retake our congress from the politicians!

------------
About Jaynee
------------

Hi, my name is Jaynee Germond and I am running for US Congress, OR District 4 because I cannot continue to sit by idly, watching our economy and our rights spiraling downward. Our representatives in Congress are not helping; rather they are the ones causing the deterioration of the economy and the destruction of our constitutionally protected rights.

We the People, are struggling to make ends meet with the money that our government allows us to keep, while our paid officials- our hired employees- are squandering our hard-earned money.

Our country has been consumed by party politics, and we need to get beyond the 2-party system, which has blurred so much that it is now unrecognizable, and look at being Americans. The 2-party system has gotten us where we are today, with the good of the party taking a back seat only to what will get me elected next time.

I want to bring back a Congress that wants what is best for America first and foremost. Term limits would help that to become a reality, but term limits would require a Constitutional Convention. If a Constitutional convention is called, Congress is not limited in what they could change in our Constitution and the results could be devastating. "We the People" need to understand that we already have term limits and they are called elections. When our officials come up for re-election and they are long-term, career politicians we need to vote them out. If we limit our reps to 6-12 years maximum we would be much more productive in DC. There wouldnt be the impetus to worry about your own election as much.

I belong to the Republican Party. Although, some may consider me Conservative, I am actually a Constitutionalist. This means that even though I have personal beliefs about some issues, the Constitution is specific about how and by whom those issues should be handled.

When I take the oath of office , I will swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

An oath is not to be taken lightly and I stand by that. Though a Christian, I am not running as a Christian, but as an American. A Christians guidebook is the Bible; an Americans guidebook is the Constitution.

I was:

- a single parent for 10 years
- in healthcare for 25 years
- a teacher for 3 years (1 in a government schools, 2 in private school) plus homeschooled our youngest daughter for 11 years was widowed remarried to a disabled Viet Nam vet owned my own business (which was closed d/t economic downturn) In other words....I am you.

Donate to Jaynee here: http://www.germond2010.com/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My Small Family Supports Jaynee.

...But she has a tough opponent, incumbent Democrat Peter Defazio.

Time for change at the local level, and I know Jaynee supports Ron Paul and honest money !

beesting

One more bump for

One more bump for Freedom!

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

Thanks for posting netzorro...

as a fellow Oregonian, we need all the help we can get-especially in the "Jefferson State." "Of the people, by the people, for the people" need to have meaning again. Thanks again.
David

"Of the people, by the

"Of the people, by the people, for the people" is exactly what we have and that's the problem.
Perhaps another phrase needs adopted -
"A government of the constitution,by the constitution,for the constitution"
or
"A government of liberty,by liberty,and for liberty"

The "of the people..." statement reeks of democracy.

------------------------------------------
"...we are face to face with the problem whether ours is a government under a written constitution and the laws made pursuant thereto, or whether it is a government by ambitious and usurping men.'" -- F.Pierce

"A government of reason is better than one of force." --Thomas Jefferson to Richard Rush, 1820

Bump for a Freedom

Bump for a Freedom candidate.

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams