Help here's some very important information every american should know about alaska, hawaii, and texas

Alaska: An Irregular State
"It is with solemn resolve and respect that the
People of the Republic of Texas will vow in their
commitment towards their American kindred
relations and to all the people of the various states
within the Union of the united states of America.
To act with whatever aid is possible in salvaging
their lands and sovereignty. With all prayer, the
People of the Republic of Texas shall, where
possible, help in fostering world peace and
friendship and respect to all cultures and religions
as private and sacred to all human beings."
—Plans & Powers of the Provisional Government
of the Republic of Texas 1
Editor’s Note: Alaska, Hawai’i and Texas are three
examples of irregular States. Each is purported to be a
state of the Union on equal footing with the other state
republics. Texas was an independent nation prior to its
voluntary admission into the Union before the Civil War. It
has since restored its independence at law distinct from the
United States. The Kingdom of Hawai’i was also an
independent nation, a republic, prior to its overthrow by
the U.S. military in 1893. It has two executive branches and
the sovereign lineage of Hawai’i still holds titles to the land
there. Both Alaska and Hawai’i entered the Union directly
as federal States, not sovereign states of the republic. In
that, Alaska and Hawai’i became the precedent for the
other forty-eight states of the Union to become federal
States also under Article IV territorial jurisdiction of the
federal United States. Large segments of the Citizenry of
these federal States have recently caught wind of this
immense fraud, and are blowing the horn of independence.
2
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary
for the Posterity and people of Alaska to ensure domestic
Tranquility, Justice, Peace, Prosperity, and a Republican
form of government for the Alaska territory, and to protect
the self-evident truths of our God-given unalienable rights to
life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness, a decent
respect to this present government requires that the
Posterity and people of Alaska should declare the causes
which impel us to make this Petition for Redress of
Grievances.
No government can exist without the consent of the
governed. When it becomes apparent that government or
agents of foreign powers are violating the rights of the
people granted to us by our Creator and secured and
protected by the organic laws of this nation; and when many
of the people of Alaska have individually petitioned this
government for redress of grievances, issued freedom of
information act requests, requested explanations of
government actions and have been repeatedly ignored and
treated with contempt; and when the abuse of these rights
continues and even escalates, then it is the right, duty and
responsibility of the Posterity and people of Alaska to
declare openly our indubitable rights, liberties and
sovereignty; and to alter, reform, or abolish the government
in such manner as to restore the proper relationship of
government to its true masters.
The rights of the Posterity and people of Alaska have been
abridged or usurped by fraud and misrepresentation
imposed by various governments and their agencies through
the use of statutes, ordinances, regulations, zoning and
states of emergency enforced by their courts to displace the
Bill of Rights and the Common law. This abuse is an
abrogation and derogation of the Common law secured by
the Constitution of the “United States Organic Act of 1787”
as lawfully amended by qualified electors of the foreign
states and by the Northwest Ordinances of 1787.
Whereas, for true ownership of lands, it is an ancient Maxim
of Law that no title is valid unless the right of possession be
joined with the right of property: which right is then
denominated a double right, jus duplicatum, or droit droit.
Droit droit is also known as allodial title or allodium estate.
Right of property and right of possession are not taught in
our schools, nor explained by government agencies, lending
institutions, lawyers, real estate companies or title insurance
companies.
> DROIT DROIT—synonymous with allodial title or
allodium estate; when the right of property and the right of
possession are joined, a double right; signifies a complete
title in land.
The State of Alaska, Alaska State Legislature, Municipalities,
Boroughs and other political subdivisions of the State of
Alaska have allowed, participated in and encouraged lending
institutions, banks, credit unions, title companies, and real
estate companies to replace and represent a true mortgage
with a Deed of Trust and Rents document. This Deed of
Trust and Rents, via fraud, misrepresentation, concealment
and deception, insures that the banks and other lending
institutions own the real property through the operative
word beneficiary, a euphemism for cestui que trust.
> CESTUI QUE TRUST— beneficiary of a trust; estate or
property to which the legal title is vested in another.
The contempt of our forefathers towards the cestui que trust
is clearly shown by the 1843 Bouvier's Law Dictionary,
which defines a cestui que trust as “barbarous.”
The concerted effort to continue to defraud the people by
substitution of the word beneficiary for cestui que trust is
clearly demonstrated by the definition of cestui que trust
found in Black's Law Dictionaries of 1891 and 1910:
“It has been proposed to substitute for this uncouth term the
English word 'beneficiary,' and the latter, though still far
from universally adopted, has come to be quite frequently
used. It is equal in precision to the antiquated and unwieldy
Norman phrase, and far better adapted to the genius of our
language.”

The current version of Black's 6th Edition Law Dictionary
continues the deception by not defining “beneficiary” as a
cestui que trust. We the People unknowingly as the Trustor
in the Deed of Trust and Rents donate the real property
through the operative word beneficiary to the lending
institutions.
As the vested owners of the real property, the lending
institutions are entitled to profits from their real property by
the land occupier or occupier of land (§3 ch 82 SLA 1960),
which translates into a politically correct term — land use!
This endless tribute of rent from tenants (the people) to the
lending institutions manifests itself yearly as property taxes
(i.e., trustee compensation fees), which we pay because we
do not truly own the real property.
This deception continues, since we are led to believe when
the debt on the property to the lending institution has been
satisfied on the Deed of Trust and Rents, that we own the
real property, which is untrue. The State of Alaska reinforces
this fraudulent belief of ownership by issuing a document
called a Warranty Deed, which conveys to us the status of
being the equitable owner.
But in reality, the equitable owner has no rights in the real
property. The true owners are the legal owners or trustees,
which are the lending institutions. In actuality, banks,
lending institutions and the government own almost all real
property in Alaska.
The Legislature of the State of Alaska has intentionally
legislated the English feudal tenant status upon the Posterity
and people of Alaska, as demonstrated by the Session Laws
of 1960 chapter 82 under definitions: “for the purposes of
this Act, the term ‘land occupier’ or ‘occupier of land’ means
any person, firm or corporation who shall hold title to, or
shall be in possession of, three or more acres of land in the
State, whether as owner, lessee, renter, tenant, or
otherwise.” [Emphasis added]
WHEREAS the Legislature of the State of Alaska in 1959 to
assure the control of the tenants (the people), created an
“Office of the Governor” which is defined in Black’s 4th Law
Dictionary: “But a power and duty may exist without
immediate grant from government, and may be properly
called an ‘office,’ as the office of executor, the office of
steward. Here the individual acts towards legatees or
towards tenants in performance of a duty, and in exercise of
a power not derived from their consent, but devolved on him
by an authority which quoad hoc is superior.”
Whereas, Alaska has three constitutions consisting of:
1. The “Constitution of the State of Alaska” was voted on
by the Posterity and people of Alaska. (Killed by
session law in 1963 chapter 1).
2. The “Alaska Constitution” was created by the
Legislators of the State of Alaska via several session
laws in 1959 and is unknown by the Posterity and
people of Alaska.
3. The “Alaska State Constitution,” is the current
constitution, an internally modified version of the
original Constitution of the State of Alaska.
This unlawful de facto Alaska Constitution consists of the
following session laws of 1959:
1. Chapter 169 on the land itself,complete with a
Preamble.
2. Chapter 143 on administrative procedures for
executive, quasi-judicial and quasi-legislative agencies
of the State.
3. Chapter 50 on the supreme and superior courts.
4. Chapter 94 on Fish and Game.
The Legislature of the State of Alaska now operates as a
territorial government known as the “Alaska State
Legislature.” This name is used on their letterheads,
Legislative Information Office Marquees and other State
documentation. These territorial legislators did offer to the
registered voters two amendments to the Alaska
Constitution that were passed. They are:
1. The first amendment was in 1970: “Proposing
amendments to the judiciary article of the Alaska
Constitution relating to the office of the chief justice of
the supreme court.”
2. The second amendment was: “Proposing an
amendment to the Alaska Constitution, establishing an
Alaska Permanent Fund for certain proceeds derived
from non-renewable resources.”
Today, even with the positive documentation of the Alaska
Constitution in the session laws of 1959 and two adopted
amendments, executive and legislative members staunchly
deny the existence of this constitution, and state that the
discrepancy of words used is insignificant.
Contrary to these official denials, the Lieutenant Governor
distributes through the Legislative Information Office a free
handout dated April 1995, entitled The Constitution of the
State of Alaska. Inside, on page 1, the Lt. Governor refers
only to the “Alaska State Constitution,” omitting any
reference to the “Constitution of the State of Alaska.”
This Alaska Constitution is printed today in the Alaska
Statutes in various titles (parts of title 16, title 22, title 44,
and title 38) to disguise its existence. How many
constitutions for the “State of Alaska,” “Alaska,” “this state,”
or “Alaska State” exist, and what is the purpose of each?
Why are these constitutions hidden from the Posterity and
people of Alaska? By what authority do the legislators and
the executive alter this legal instrument, known as the
“Constitution of the State of Alaska?” Is this not a flagrant
betrayal of the public trust?
Whereas, the Posterity and people of Alaska were duped into
voting for a constitution which imposed no limits on the
power of the legislature. This fact was known and supported
by the founders of the “Constitution of the State of Alaska,”
as stated by the Daily News Miner of February 6, 1956 on
the front page: “
The legislative department is strong because the constitution
leaves so much for the future legislators to accomplish, and
because the constitution puts no serious restriction on the
power of the legislature.”
Using this unlimited power, the legislature of the State of
Alaska created a Legislative Branch in the Session Laws of
1959 chapter 157 with no limits to its power, except to
operate within the people’s perception of a lawful legislature.
This legislative chameleon-like transformation from a
bicameral republican form of government consisting of a
senate and house of representatives, to a territorial
government composed of a legislature with two houses is
demonstrated by three different stages.
The first stage is the “Constitution of the State of Alaska.”
The second stage is the Legislative Branch created by the
Legislature of the State of Alaska. The third stage is the
codified legislature of the Legislative Branch Act in the
Alaska Statutes at Title.24
Whereas, the State of Alaska officials have denied the
existence of the Territory of Alaska, as recorded in United
States Code Title 16 Section 3201, Definitions (3)(A) “land
selections of the State of Alaska which have been tentatively
approved or validly selected under the Alaska Statehood Act
and lands which have been confirmed to, validly selected by,
or granted to the Territory of Alaska or the State under any
other provision of Federal law;” [Emphasis added]
This parallel existence of the Territory of Alaska and the
State of Alaska is further validated in many parts of the Code
of Federal Regulations, such as 50 C.F.R. §100.4, 36 C.F.R. §
242.4, 50 C.F.R. §36.2 and 34 C.F.R. §13.1 (1996), which
also states: “Land selections of the State of Alaska which
have been tentatively approved or validly selected under the
Alaska Statehood Act (72 Stat. 339) and lands which have
been confirmed to, validly selected by, or granted to the
Territory of Alaska or the State under any other provision of
Federal law. ...”
This dual existence is further validated at 22 C.F.R. § 133.1;
43 C.F.R. § 2623.0-8; and 26 C.F.R. § 31.3401(a)(5)-1. The
Territory of Alaska latitude and longitude areas are recorded
in the Code of Federal Regulations at 14 CFR Sec. 95.17. A
picture of the Territory of Alaska in 1962 is recorded in the
Federal Register at 27 FR 4356, May 8, 1962.
Still, the State of Alaska government officials refuse to
acknowledge the existence of the Territory of Alaska — even
with the conclusive documentation provided to them.
Whereas, the true Common law and equity courts are the
law for the sovereign people to maintain control of our
government. The State of Alaska government and its officials
have concealed from the people of Alaska our true common
law courts, as secured by the Seventh Amendment of Bill of
Rights of the Constitution for the united states of America.
We the Posterity and people of Alaska demand to know the
location, the rules of court and the seals of the real Common
law court or in the alternative, if they have been suspended
and by what authority.
Whereas, the State of Alaska government and officials
thereof have concealed the identity of public officials of the
Territory of Alaska. We, the Posterity and people of Alaska,
demand to know the following information regarding the
Territory of Alaska:
1. Who are the public servants and what are their
responsibilities?
2. Who are the judges and where are the courts located?
3. What is the jurisdiction and type of law(s) of each of
these courts?
4. What is the citizenship status of the judges?
5. What is the citizenship status of the petit and grand jury
members?
6. Are gold-fringed flags used in the public offices and
courts? If so, where is the authority to use such gold-
fringed flags? What does the gold-fringe signify when
used on the flags of the Territory of Alaska and united
states of America?
Whereas, the State of Alaska government and officials
thereof have concealed the identity of public officials with
their total responsibilities, courts, and the jurisdiction of the
courts of the State of Alaska. We, the Posterity and people of
Alaska, demand to know the following regarding the State of
Alaska:
1. Who are the public servants and what are their
responsibilities? It seems that many of the public
servants carry several titles and job responsibilities to
more than one governmental agency, entity or
corporation?
2. Who are the judges and where are their courts located?
3. What is the jurisdiction and type of law(s) of each of
these courts?
4. What is Black Letter law?
5. Are these federal courts, courts of the State of Alaska,
courts of this state, ecclesiastical courts, courts of
several types combined or courts of unknown entities
and secret jurisdictions?
6. Why are the judges of the State of Alaska required to
have dual citizenship? What is each of these citizenships
of the judges (citizen of the United States and the state)?
7. Why are employees of the State of Alaska required to
have only a single citizenship status (citizen of the
United States)?
8. Why are jury members required to have only a single
citizenship status (citizen of the United States)?
9. Why is a citizen of the United States of America denied
access to a petit or grand jury in the State of Alaska?
10.Why is a citizen of the State of Alaska denied access to a
petit or grand jury in the State of Alaska?
11. What is the citizenship status required to be a member
of a petit and grand jury?
12.Why do these courts and government offices display a
gold-fringed flag (State of Alaska and the United States
of America)? Where is the authorization and
explanation to display a gold-fringed flag? Why is the
gold fringed flag described only in Army regulations 840
-10, 1979 update?
13.Is the State of Alaska and/or the United States in
bankruptcy or receivership?
14.What is the Seal of the State of Alaska? How many seals
does the State of Alaska have? Why does the Lt.
Governor and other agencies and officials of the State of
Alaska use at least two different seals? What do each of
these seals represent in all respects? Whereas, the
United States Code Title 8 Section 1481 under —MISC2
— has the following recorded from the Revised Statutes
of 1873-74 and 1878 in what can only be taken as a
treasonous statement in direct conflict with the
Constitution for the United States of America and the
sovereign People of the United States of America:
This emphasis statement is for the Posterity of We the
People of the United States of America to abandon and
disavow our allegiance to our foreign state of
birthright (each of the several states are foreign to each
other and are called foreign states).
By what authority should we desert our country of birth, and
who would knowingly disavow allegiance to his/her country
in favor of a de facto corporation and forswear unalienable
rights for dubious benefits and privileges? Do you support
this R.S. Sec. 1999?
Whereas, the enabling act of the Congress of the United
States of America for admittance of a state into the lawful
Union contains two definite requirements. First, each lawful
state is to become "one of the United States of America."
Second, each lawful state shall be on an equal footing with
the original States. The correct enabling act of lawful states
into the Union is shown below, versus the unlawful enabling
act language of Alaska.
Lawful admission into the Union
WHEREAS, "That the State of Kansas shall be, and is hereby
declared to be, one of the United States of America, and
admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the
original States in all respects whatever." 29 January, 1861, c.
20,s. l, v. 12, p. 126. is the lawful means to become one of the
several states, but
Unlawful admission into the Union
WHEREAS, "That, subject to the provisions of this Act, and
upon issuance of the proclamation required by section 8 (c)
of this Act, the State of Alaska is hereby declared to be a
State of the United States of America, is declared admitted
into the Union on an equal footing with the other States in
all respects whatever..." Public Law 85-508, 85th Congress,
H. R. 7999, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339 as Amended,
THEREFORE, We, the Posterity and people of Alaska, now
know that the State of Alaska is not "one of the United States
of America, admitted into the Union on an equal footing
with the original States in all respects whatever.” It is rather
“a State of the United States of America,” one of the “other
States,” “this state,” and “another State,” all unknown to the
Constitution of the United States of 1787, and the Posterity and
people of Alaska.
THEREFORE, the Constitution of the State of Alaska,
Alaska Statutes, Alaska Administrative Code and all
instrumentalities in one form or another of the State of
Alaska have no effect, no jurisdiction and are null and void
on the lawful citizens of the United States of America (also
known as citizens of the foreign states).30
illegal overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawai’i on January 17,
1893, and apologizes to the Native Hawai’i(an)s on behalf of
the people of the United States.4
Internationally renowned Attorney Francis A. Boyle has in-
terpreted this action as a window of opportunity for the na-
tive Hawai’i(an) sovereignty movement to restore their inde-
pendent nation state under the auspices of international law.
It’s necessary to launch an educational process in the
Kingdom of Hawai’i to teach the people how to govern
themselves and move toward unification. A provisional
government for the Kingdom of Hawai’i has been initiated.
All the titles of the lands have been held in trust for the
Hawai’i(an) people since the overthrow in 1893.It’s just a
matter of competent and visionary leadership coming
forward and agreeing on a process and structure for the
unification of 300 or more factions.
There must be competent, reliable and integral individuals
who can lift themselves into the role of statesmen/women.
The Hawai’i(ans) do not need more politicians or self-
interested leadership whose only concern is getting re-
elected or keeping their piece of the political pie.
Hawai’i has been ruled by foreigners for generations, partly
because the Hawai’i(an) people have been unwilling to learn
how to govern themselves, or too busy competing with each
other through tribal/clan rivalries.
Petty tyrants and many pretenders to the throne keep the
people divided, thus conquered as thoroughly as the global
elite can. Better that we all be sovereigns without subjects.
(See also the Sovereign Hawai’ian’s Handbook by Johnny
Liberty). 5