Unanimous House Resolution 378-0: Obama Born in Hawaii; Bachmann Votes "Yea"
Submitted by SteveMT on Tue, 07/28/2009 - 09:55
What is going on here? Ron Paul: Not voting along with 54 others.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll647.xml
Resolution Proclaiming Hawaii Obama's Birthplace Passes House Unanimously
07-27-09 08:06 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/house-to-consider-c...
»





















My goodness, not the House has facts, not the House has
documentation, the House has resolved he was born in Hawaii. I hope nobody said, I'll be damned if he wasn't born in Hawaii, which is Hawai'i.
For some reason, we're expected to know every law that exists in America & in our state so we don't break it. We're supposed to know this when we're 18. There's no litmus test for them, as in the 10 commandments or rhyme or reason. C.U.R.E.
It's obvious,
at least to me, that the Obama admin is hiding something. Repeatedly calling people names like "birthers" is beside the point and will not work. You Paultards should know this.
It was reported that CNN chief Klein said that Hawaii had discarded all physical records when going electronic. So, "No record exists. Case closed. Shut up you birther racists!" Are we living in Alice in Wonderland here? I knew that Klein's assertion was ridiculous. Keeping records is task #1 of government agencies. They do not destroy them or throw them away. It was not a credible assertion and so Hawaii was forced to admit its falsity. Obama needs to show this record or be removed from office. The next thing will be calls for his removal.
To those wo say, "Peter Schiff! The Fed!", honestly are you aware that this is a liberty forum? Who are you to tell me where to focus my activism? What could be more important than removing a foreign agent from the White House who is communizing us as we speak?
bring it on
actually this might have opened the door for a flood of new law suits.
Especially this Hawaiian health department lady who had the nerve to call him natural born citizen.
That screams for an in court explaination.
-------------------------------------------------------
"I think it would be a good idea"
Mahatma Gandhi,
when asked what he thought of Western civilization
Did Congress see the long-form Birth Certificate?
If so admit that you saw it, publish it so we can see it, otherwise this proves nothing in my mind. I find it interesting that all of a sudden we have this from congress and then a statement from Hawaii etc. To be honest I think Obama is the son of Frank Marshal Davis and is an under the radar communist racist. Congress does not even read a bill they vote on; therefore, they have no credibility anymore. What a farce this vote was. And for all you trolls who say this makes us look bad there is a simple solution ------------------------------- show the bloody certificate. There is a reason why the guy spends so much to hide his records ------------- he is hiding something. If Frank Marshal Davis really is Obama's father he never would have won the Presidency.
"Birthers" are as ignorant as "Truthers"
David Harsanyi's excellent article on the matter available at Reason:
http://www.reason.com/news/show/135094.html
"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower
"David Harsanyi's excellent article" Bunk! No evidence provided.
Accusations and a lot of mud thrown is all that I read. How is this hit piece excellent? It is trash!
Harsanyi writes for the Denver Post.(liberal mainstream)
And Reason Magazine is trash, and if the people there had any principles, they were lost long ago.
The entire LP is adrift.
That article's a recap of liberal mainstream pap.
But, apparently, he's in the proper career.
Liberal media spin doctor.
Sorry
Some things can not be voted on . We should impeach on this alone
If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!
It's an open legal question
(assuming for a moment he was born in Kenya)
How do you know that your interpretation is the correct/best one?
This is a "controlled burn" by the white house and will only serve to discredit Liberty Movement.
Here and now it serves as a vent only
If you believe Obama is Kenyan or Martian for that matter. To forge the needed documintation would be so easy a cave man could do it . Like I said it is a vent nothing more. To see that he committed fraud for financial add PRICELESS !
If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!
The only result would be
The only result would be President Joe Biden, so that is no change
LET IT GO
You people need to let this issue go. It does nothing but discredit our movement as a bunch of nut jobs. Focus on the Fed, Rand and Peter Schiff. We have our missions. We have our short term and long term goals. Let this go for gods sake. Obama is President. If you stop all this BS and get back to work, we can make a REAL impact in the liberty movement. Remember, the FED, Schiff, and Rand Paul. Get to work!
-T.Plev
-T.Plevel
Proof need from the accuser
If someone makes an accusation, the accuser needs to provide the evidence of wrongdoing.
I don't like Obama as much as anyone around here, but this argument that he is not a natural born citizen is the stuff of speculation and makes us look like fools grasping at straws.
How about records from Kenya...
There's plenty of
There's plenty of proof...for example Obama's grandma saying that she was present when he was born in Kenya...and I'm not hearing anyone say "Obama's grandma didn't say" that or "Obama's grandma is lying"
It is for Obama to provide
It is for Obama to provide the proof that he IS a natural born citizen, nor for us to provide proof that he is not. So far, after spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on attorney fees, he has yet to show sufficient proof that he is, which is namely a long form of birth certificate. It is simple and easy to show it if he indeed possesses it and would quiet all speculation. Why hasn't he? I had to show my daughter's birth certificate two days ago for her to take a driving course!
Proof needed
If you accuse someone of wrong doing, the burden of proof is on you. If you accuse me of killing someone, I don't need to provide proof that I didn't.
If you are applying for a service, and the process is defined as needing to provide certain documents; then the burden is on you to follow the process to complete your application.
Really, what makes this any more than speculation?
Don't we have much better evidence of why he shouldn't be president than this?
I haven't seen the actual text of the resolution, but...
I'd be willing to bet any amount of money that it specifically lists his name in ALL CAPS because that's where the trust/strawman/legal fiction known as BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA was created when he became a citizen of the corporate UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. No one can vote NO because it can be proven that this legal fiction was created there. That is why the ONLY choice for them is to side-step the issue and abstain from voting.
Someone find the actual resolution or a transcript or something. I'm 100% POSITIVE it does, even without seeing it.
Check the birth cert. It sure as hell does:
http://www.donkeydish.com/gallery/barack-obama-birth-certifi...
Why am I so certain? Because only legal fictions can deal with other legal fictions. Think of it this way - could you file a lawsuit against a tree? How about an animal? Humans are basically highly advanced animals. What makes us able to be sued? Because you were pledged as collateral for the state when your mom signed that birth certificate. She relinquished title of your body to the state. Simple as that. Have you voided that contract yet? No? Then you're still their property! Do you use documents with the ALL CAPS name printed on them (driver's license, ss card, passport, marriage license, etc.)? Did you SIGN THESE ITEMS? Congratulations! You just agreed to represent that legal fiction! They now have your own personal consent, not just your mom's.
Time to wake up, people!!! Watch and learn:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7040453665540929835
maybe YOU can answer this question
Before the 14th amendment we are listed as Citizens of the various States... In the 14th and after we are listed as citizens of the UNITED STATES....
What is the difference? If we REPEAL the 14th doesn't that get us our rights back?
I know about the strawman stuff and the birther certificate bs...
But so far NO ONE on this sitehas provided me with a complete answer to this CONSTITUTIONAL question...
Peace
Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?
Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?
on citizenship...
pretty good explanation here:
http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/On_State_Citizenship.html
This is a nightmare
We have all unwittingly validated a legal fiction by signing our names to documents that have our names spelled in all capital letters, and now we must engage in legal fiction to undo it? WTF? I'm not questioning the validity of your comment, I've heard it before. But I do question the validity of anyone's claim to one second of my life. Any so-called "consent" obtained through fraud and/or deception is invalid. Fuck the State. The State can bring its weak-ass claim for my life to my front door.
Happy to hear there are others who know real truth out there.
I reserve the right to govern myself.
I reserve the right to govern myself.
How is RP going to vote?
He has three choices he took the best one for many reasons.
I don't give weight to the
I don't give weight to the "birther" argument at all. But now why would this sort of thing require a vote resolution...can the vote count in either direction alter factural event? And this is going to silence the birther or just make them yell louder? What a waste of time and tax money!
I think this an ELECTION REFORM issue
America has politely just assumed that the folks at the DNC and RNC are above board in how they select their candidates. These are the only parties that don't have to go state to state providing documentation for their selected candidate. ( This is since the "debacle with Perot" after which both parties lobbied hard to secure the system that is currently in place - ie. The Party says they are OK so they are OK). Everyone just assumed that the DNC and the RNC would do the proper vetting and uphold the Constitution. The DNC is the actual culprit.
AND
I do not doubt that the RNC is a party to this at some level.
QUESTION: Name the party I'm talking about during the last election:
One candidate was the "young, new fresh face - future of the party"
One candidate was an old, white, long-time DC career guy.
One candidate was a "minority".
The Candidate - when the splinter issue of the Bailout finally emerged - sat next to President Bush and said that the Bailout was necessary.
The Candidate may encounter Constitutional problems because of place of birth.
ANSWER: BOTH PARTIES. They put up the same damn ticket. The Democrats were sure to win anyway because Bush decimated the brand of "Republican". The whole election was A SET UP!!!
So I hold the DNC (and the RNC) responsible for this whole Obama Birth Certificate mess. There is no point in introducing laws restating what it already says in the Constitution. The thing that HAS to happen is that the Dems and Repubs must do what every other party in America has to do...get their candidate approved for ballot inclusion by each and every state separately. Period.
Don't forget Roger Calero of Nicaragua!
from the Donofrio case.
Nobody checked his credentials either!
"According to this case, Roger Calero is not qualified, because he was born a citizen of Nicaragua, to foreign parents, on foreign soil. The mere fact that Roger Calero was on the ballot in five states indicates to the Supreme Court and the nation, that the process of qualifying a presidential candidate is broken and intervention is necessary."
p.s. End The Fed! ;-)
House Resolution = B.S.
I guess a House Resolution is better than a birth certificate, right?
What about
this?
Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) is the only president born of two immigrants, both Irish. Presidents with one immigrant parent are Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), whose mother was born in England, James Buchanan (1857-1861) and Chester Arthur (1881-1885), both of whom had Irish fathers, and Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933), whose mothers were born respectively in England and Canada.
They were grandfathered in. It is in the Constitution.
They were the originals.
And for the other later ones,
if they were born on US soil, then they are natural born citizens.
The issue with Obama is that it is NOT resolved that he was born on US soil, and if he wasn't, then he's not qualified, because the other stuff about his parents would disqualify him if he was born on foreign soil.
As for the later ones,
there is no mention as to whether the immigrant parents were US citizens are not.
During the Senate resolution on McCain's eligibility Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy defined Natural Born as when BOTH parents are US citizens and the child is born within the US or a territory of the US.