Wall Street Profits from Trades With FEDERAL RESERVE

0 votes

This article in today's Financial Times should provide more evidence on why an audit is badly needed on the Federal Reserve.

Wall Street profits from trades with Fed
By Henny Sender in New York

Published: August 2 2009 23:04 | Last updated: August 2 2009 23:04

Wall Street banks are reaping outsized profits by trading with the Federal Reserve, raising questions about whether the central bank is driving hard enough bargains in its dealings with private sector counterparties, officials and industry executives say.

The Fed has emerged as one of Wall Street’s biggest customers during the financial crisis, buying massive amounts of securities to help stabilise the markets. In some cases, such as the market for mortgage-backed securities, the Fed buys more bonds than any other party.

EDITOR’S CHOICE
Wall Street benefits from Fed and Treasury - Aug-02Editorial: The value of bank independence - Aug-02Opinion: Trichet should convene a trip to the beach - Aug-02In depth: US banks - May-07In depth: Central banks - Mar-09However, the Fed is not a typical market player. In the interests of transparency, it often announces its intention to buy particular securities in advance. A former Fed official said this strategy enables banks to sell these securities to the Fed at an inflated price.

The resulting profits represent a relatively hidden form of support for banks, and Wall Street has geared up to take advantage. Barclays, for example, e-mails clients with news on the Fed’s balance sheet, detailing the share of the market in particular securities held by the Fed.

“You can make big money trading with the government,” said an executive at one leading investment management firm. “The government is a huge buyer and seller and Wall Street has all the pricing power.”

A former official of the US Treasury and the Fed said the situation had reached the point that “everyone games them. Their transparency hurts them. Everyone picks their pocket.”

The central bank’s approach to securities purchases was defended by William Dudley, president of the New York Fed, which is responsible for market operations. “We believe that opting for transparency is a greater good,” he said. “If we didn’t have transparency, we’d be criticised on other grounds.”

However, another official familiar with the matter said the central bank “has heard that dealers load up on securities to sell to the Fed. There is concern, but policy goals override other considerations.”

Barney Frank, chairman of the House financial services committee, said the potential profiteering may be part of the price for stabilising the financial system.

“You can’t rescue the credit system without benefiting some of the people in it.” Still, Mr Frank said Congress would be watching. “We don’t want the Fed to drive the hardest possible bargain, but we don’t want them to get ripped off.”

The growing Fed activity has coincided with a general widening of market spreads – the difference between bid and offer prices – as the number of market participants declines. Wider spreads enable banks, in their capacity as market-makers, to make more profit.

Larry Fink, chief executive of money manager BlackRock, has described Wall Street’s trading profits as “luxurious”, reflecting the banks’ ability to take advantage of diminished competition.

“Bid-offer spreads have remained unusually wide, notwithstanding the normalisation of financial markets,” said Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive of fund manager Pimco in Newport Beach, California.

Spreads narrowed dramatically during the years of the credit bubble.

Brad Hintz, an analyst at AllianceBernstein, said he doubted that spreads would ever return to those levels, a development that could be pleasing to the Fed.

“They want to help Wall Street make money,” he said.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e84383dc-7f8c-11de-85dc-00144feabd...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

An article on How the FED helped their Friends on Wall Street

Thanks to Zero Hedge for this article which explains game is played.
Successful Week for Treasury?
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 08/01/2009 09:42 -0500

DebtDebt buybacksFEDFederal ReserveFederal Reserve SystemInterest ratesManipulationMarket ManipulationMBSMoneyMOVEprimary dealersquantitative easingTreasuryTreasury bond salesUS Treasury

The Treasury had a very successful week. They sold a total of $109 billion of new coupon securities as follows:

2 year: $42 billion
5 year: $39 billion
7 year: $28 billion

The auctions went very well. By Friday evening interest rates on the ten-year had fallen from 3.75% on Monday to 3.5%. A very big downward move in yield given the large supply of coupons. Follows is a chart of the weeks trading in the ten-year. Note that the bulk of the drop in rates occurred after the release of the 7 year results on Thursday. From 1:30 on Thursday through the close on Friday it was just one gigantic money making opportunity for the primary dealers.

Treasury/the Dealers had some help from their friend, the Federal Reserve. On Thursday and Friday the Fed bought $29 billion of fixed coupons. Of that, $6.5 billion were direct obligations of Treasury, $23 billion was Agency MBS. The effect of these purchases was to provide stability to the broad fixed rate market. It worked very well.

Net net 27% of last weeks Treasury debt sales were offset with demand from the Fed. The Fed/Treasury strategy is clearly working, at least in the short term. The problem is that it can’t be sustained.

I think the timing of these Fed purchase constitutes Intervention in the market. This is not just a program of quantitative easing any longer. This is market manipulation. That never works for very long. And when the intervention ends (it must) the jump in rates will be breathtaking.

Thomas Jefferson once said,

Thomas Jefferson once said, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Well, I guess he called that one.