THERE IS NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN WORKING ON AUDIT THE FED!!!

Martial law is not "round ups", it's full miliue control; full spectrum dominance. If they came on the loudspeaker at a football game and said, "Remain calm. We are stopping the game under orders of the department of homeland security. It is important for you to stay in your seats and remain silent until further notice. There are 100 police officers protecting the entrances for your safety. Anyone who speaks will be arrested."
Do you think you'd get an upswell of revolt? I don't see any evidence to tell me it would happen. I think people would sit there, dead silent. Those who speak would be ratted-out by the rest of the section. I think if there ever was a "round up" of all citizens, they could get 80-90% just by asking them to show up.
Most people aren't walking around scared, they're walking around stupid.

a relative peace this past 100 years.

Perhaps there might have been more people on the planet, but we would be free to work things out creatively because there would be no fight/flight, traumas, stresses.

There would have been no WWI, no WWII, very little degradation, no AMA, no FDA, no WTO, no UN, no diseases like we have now, no hydrogen bombs, no atomic bombs, no genocides, no European Union, no isms, no monopolies, no fluoride in the water, no terror, no bizzare fears for our lives.

Because of the relatively free markets everywhere, people's minds would always be geared towards making everything that much better. We would not be on a 'grid'. We would have to pay everything with earned cash or some kind of trade, that includes our homes. Land in itself would be very valuable for crops grown organically. There would have been no pesticides, no herbicides.

Life would still be considered 'sacred'. Unions based on love and care.

Teaching, healing and preparing of our foods, would have remained an art.

Creativity would be rampant, happiness and abundance rampant.

Freedom of choice would cause multitudes of diverse ways of living according to peoples' imaginations and preferences.

If some wanted to live communally and practice 'communism', great, they can do that amongst themselves.

If some enjoyed the excitement of high stakes and winner takes all, great that would be there for them.

If those want solitude in nature, they could have that to their hearts content.

I can only conclude when I contemplate this that somewhere along the line back then, a small group of people with insatiable selfishness put the wheels in motion to see if their scheme would work and lo and behold, because a majority of people world-wide were honest and trusting, they didn't see what was coming. It wasn't even in their consciousness. It is safe to say, this abomination corrupted the entire world for the most part.

There were some back then who dreaded the expansion of our creativity and consciousness. There had to have been a deliberate attempt to squash this.

We have to find our way back to innocence.

www.therootsofchange.com

http://www.thehiddenevil.com/fed.asp

Excerpt:

"Essential to controlling a government is the establishment of a central bank with a monopoly on the country's supply of money and credit," wrote Perloff. Meyer Rothschild is said to have remarked, "Let me issue and control a nation's money, and I care not who writes its laws." Allen concurred, "All those who have sought dictatorial control over modern nations have understood the necessity of a central bank. When the League of Just Men hired a hack revolutionary named Karl Marx to write a blueprint for conquest called The Communist Manifesto, the fifth plank read: "Centralization of credit in the hands of the state... Lenin later said that the establishment of a central bank was ninety percent of communizing a country."

We all know that an audit of the fed is a Pandora's box.....They have been shrouded in secrecy for 100 yrs... It seems to me that an audit would expose MASSIVE corruption and theft on a scale that even those who want it....probably won't be able to comprehend. Just think of how many other countries have a stake in our money...it won't just be pissing off Americans. The US would be in for some MAJOR back-lash from around the globe and then there is the fact that we are not the only country with "Money Changers". There are others in cahoots with our Fed such as the Bank of England. I can't imagine any other reason. JMO, but I think they fear for their lives.....

"I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace".
Thomas Paine