New York Times - Children Bad For Environment
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/having-children...
Having children is the surest way to send your carbon footprint soaring, according to a new study from statisticians at Oregon State University.
The study found that having a child has an impact that far outweighs that of other energy-saving behaviors.
Take, for example, a hypothetical American woman who switches to a more fuel-efficient car, drives less, recycles, installs more efficient light bulbs, and replaces her refrigerator and windows with energy-saving models. If she had two children, the researchers found, her carbon legacy would eventually rise to nearly 40 times what she had saved by those actions.
“Clearly, the potential savings from reduced reproduction are huge compared to the savings that can be achieved by changes in lifestyle,” the report states.
The impact of children varies dramatically depending on geography: An American woman who has a baby will generate nearly seven times the carbon footprint of that of a Chinese woman who has a child, the study found.
continue reading at the link
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/having-children...
Yes, C02, the matter that humans breath out is a
poison...
---
"...the State never teaches children about the root of its power – force – but instead pretends that it is just another social institution, like a business or a church or a charity." - Stefan Molyneux
People who think like this
People who think like this should volunteer their own lives to "help" the environment.
I definitely agree that these leftists
should avoid breeding.
I have 3 kids
and drive a 4WD Ford Expedition, how's that for a footprint?