Rebutting the Afghan BlatherSubmitted by LatinsforPaul on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 11:18
Where to Begin Rebutting the Afghan Blather?
by Christopher Dowd, August 19, 2009
Everything that appears in our mainstream media about foreign policy is blather.
Everything we read about Afghanistan and Iraq and Iran floats upon a sea of false premises and lies of omission and commission.
Right now the American mainstream media is printing mountains of news stories and editorials and opinion pieces about the Afghanistan "elections." All of it is blather. All of it. This is an election where no political parties are allowed. This is an election for a government that does next to nothing but serve as a propaganda tool for an occupying army, an election where no one truly opposed to the U.S./NATO occupation is allowed to run. All the stories and opinion pieces on this election miss the plain, simple fact that this is an "election" being conducted under occupation and is seen by probably next to no one in Afghanistan, regardless of their politics or ideology, as legitimate.
In fact, this whole election production in Afghanistan is being staged more for Americans than Afghans. The election is meant to soothe a skeptical and impatient American public. Having lived with war and occupation propaganda of all types for 30 plus years, Afghans know better.
And it’s barely worth mentioning, as it is the sort of hypocrisy out of Washington that barely merits notice at this point, that the U.S., at one time, espoused the principle that elections held under foreign occupation were automatically illegitimate. But of course, elections held under American occupation are never illegitimate, because we are America and America is inherently good and selfless. The rules don’t apply to us, the exceptional and indispensable nation.
Continue reading: http://original.antiwar.com/christopher-dowd/2009/08/18/wher...