We need desperately a whole battery of lawyers..

a slap on the wrist.

No, violation of an oath means loss of the office - there is no other alternative. They hold office BECAUSE they took the oath. Violate the oath - lose the office. That also of course means losing ANYTHING that came with the office, including pay, pension, etc. and most likely would require REPAYMENT of anything received in the past in connection with the office.

Could a "citizen's arrest" be done for violation of oath of office? That's what I want to know. I would think being arrested by a group of constituents (in a non violent manner of course) would be hard for courts to ignore. And if they did, then the group need only commit to repeating the arrest till the courts folded and began prosecuting officials.

are staying away from all this controversy in droves because they don't want to lose their livelihood. They know the judges are bought and paid off. They know people get killed. They know we are outnumbered and that the people are helpless in what is happening unless and until the military decides to do something about this in total or enough of the people come to a consensus that we gain enough strength. But how can that happen. It can't because "they" have chemtrails which can do as much damage as they want, where they want, when they want, over as large or small a territory as they want. They can mind control, put to sleep, kill, sicken, whatever they want to pull out of their arsenal. Hell of a spot we are in, huh. No where to turn???

Jay Sekulow and his group may be a hope, but I doubt it.

sorry to disappoint you though, but I am not a lawyer. I know a lot of lawyers, though, so if I get myself into hot water with my activism, I can probably find someone to represent me.

A few things about the ACLU. They say they defend the Bill of Rights, but somehow they forget about some of the first ten amendments, despite all their zeal. I haven't heard of them defending anyone's second amendment rights or getting emotional about the tenth amendment, which should give the states and the people a degree of sovereignty from the federal government.

However, the ACLU has its uses. In the Maryland Police spying case, in which the State Police spied on peace and anti-death penalty activists, then labelled them as terrorists, fed the info into a member database of the Maryland fusion center, the ACLU not only filed Maryland freedom of information requests to reveal the information the police requested--they went on to assist members of the Maryland State Senate to pass legislation to protect protesters from similar treatment in the future. The ACLU was also behind a legislative attempt to oversee fusion centers in New Mexico (which unfortunately failed, because of protests by the NM offices of the District Attorneys and the Department of the Public Defenders). They also have taken on the case of C4L's Steve Bierfeldt, who was detained in a MO airport the same week the MIAC report came out. And all this is what I know of their work in the narrow field I know most about...there are other issues that are of concern to them which are also solidly our issues also.

Perhaps this is just a longwinded way of agreeing with you. I would also love to see a network of Constitutional attorneys willing to take on liberty issues. I also believe that we need attorneys in all of the states who are willing to do the same thing, but defending the Constitution piecemeal, case by case, only can have a limited impact. C4L or some similar organization (who knows, maybe it needs to be an entirely independent organization) also needs to have a similar presence in the drafting of legislation...because the impact of law is more pervasive and longer lasting than much of judicial precident.

Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson