Get Out of Afghanistan and Everywhere Else

0 votes

Get Out of Afghanistan and Everywhere Else
by Jacob G. Hornberger

If there was ever a classic example of a quagmire, it has got to be Afghanistan. Hey, they’re going on 8 or 9 years of killing the terrorists and just now getting a good start. What began out as a quest to kill or capture Osama bin Laden has morphed into long-term occupation of the country.

Hardly a week goes by without reports of new deaths, including Afghani citizens and U.S. soldiers or allied foreign soldiers.

Yet, despite the constant death toll and the lack of a well-defined mission, the Pentagon insists on the importance of continuing the occupation of Afghanistan.

Why?

Because the Pentagon knows that if the troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan and the Middle East, Americans might well begin asking the questions they should have asked in 1989, when the Berlin Wall came crashing down and the Soviet Empire disintegrated: What do we need a huge standing military force for? What do we need an overseas empire for? What do we need the enormous expanse of military bases across America for? Indeed, what do we need the Pentagon for?

The fact is that despite deeply seeded fears and anxieties that the federal government has succeeded in engendering within the psyches of the American people, there is no nation on earth that has the military capability of invading and occupying the United States. To cross either the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans with an invasion force would require tens of thousands of ships and planes, a capability that is nonexistent among all foreign nations.

Of course, the big bugaboo that the Pentagon now uses to justify its existence (along with the enormous tax burden necessary to sustain its enormous military) is terrorism (as compared to communism, which was the bugaboo prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dismantling of the Soviet Empire).

But the threat of terrorism is a direct result of what the Pentagon did both prior to and after 9/11 as part of its aggressive, interventionist foreign policy in the Middle East. That threat has remained constant, of course, given the continuous killing of people in Iraq and Afghanistan for the last 8 years.

But the Pentagon knows that by withdrawing from Afghanistan and the Middle East, that constant threat of terrorist retaliation plummets. At that point, the only risk of terrorist retaliation would be from some disgruntled person whose family members or friends were killed by the U.S. military sometime in the past. There’s no need for an enormous military to deal with that possibility, and the Pentagon knows it.

Continue reading: http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2009-08-27.asp

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bump

for the afternoon crowd.

bump for peace

Thank you for posting this.

"Better to fight for something than live for nothing.”
-- George S. Patton
“Complacent ignorance is the most lethal sickness of the soul.”
-- Plato

Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul

Thanks...

From Wikipedia:

Jacob G. (Bumper) Hornberger (born in Laredo, Texas, USA) is an author, journalist, politician, and the founder and president of the Future of Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit libertarian educational foundation based in Fairfax, Virginia.

Hornberger received a Bachelor of Arts in economics from the Virginia Military Institute, to which he then received a commission as an officer in the Army Reserve. Following his retirement from the Army, Hornberger earned a law degree from the University of Texas School of Law. In 1989, Hornberger (along with several other libertarians) founded the Future of Freedom Foundation in order to create an educational forum against what he and the others noted as a "gradual erosion of rights" in America. He attempted to gain the Libertarian Party nomination for President of the United States, but lost to Harry Browne. Hornberger also ran as the Libertarian Party candidate in Virginia in the 2002 US Senate race. He appeared on the ballot as an independent candidate rather than as a libertarian due to ballot access restrictions. Hornberger finished the three way race in third, receiving 106,055 votes for 7.1% of the total vote. [1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_G._Hornberger

Ron Paul 2012 for Peace

Ron Paul 2012 for Peace

Makes sense to me

When will the conservatives get it? Conservatism is an oxymoron when it comes to military empires.

Peace.

Peace.