| |
  
|
||||||||||
Ron Paul hit piece published in The Daily Beast
Submitted by Godwhacker on Mon, 08/31/2009 - 07:39
Dana Goldstein published a libelous hit piece in The Daily Beast today. Seeing this was the last time I'll ever visit that website. » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
I almost clicked on, but I
I almost clicked on, but I decided not to give them any more traffic to the site. I'll take your word for it.
DO WHAT THEY HATE THE MOST
"They" being financial media establishment pitbulls - pull back the shroud. Google is your friend for revealing professional loyalties.
Dana Goldstein
is an associate editor at
The American Prospect
Her writing has also appeared in
Slate
BusinessWeek
and
The New Republic
associate editor of
CampusProgress.org
For instance;
"Whether by inclination or socialization, women just aren't natural political combatants, as they crave positive reinforcement and want desperately to be liked."
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=12161
hehehe
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."
Thomas Jefferson, 1799
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."
Thomas Jefferson, 1799
Little feminist girl w/shotgun
Title banned from a Dana Goldstein endorsed website. Kinda hypocritical imagery considering her bashing of 2nd Amendment supporters
http://www.feministe.us/blog/
http://danagoldstein.typepad.com/
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."
Thomas Jefferson, 1799
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."
Thomas Jefferson, 1799
take this as a compliment.
Smears or not, the opposition is afraid of gun toting constitution loving people who are now speaking out.
You will notice that in the article she could only attempt to use the actions of others besides Paul to try and discredit the movement as militia/whacky Tim McVeigh style religious nutjobs.
They are scared and see Paul's ideas gaining momentum; enough momentum for a knockout in 2010 to the house and possibly auditing/ending the fed is a possibility in the future.
They realize if the fed is audited or eventually ended, they will loose their ability to tax the people through inflation. The fed must be audited, then ended. This is the only way to stop the deficit spending and to ever limit the size and scope of government.
I'm so looking forward to Dr. Paul's end the fed book to have more understanding about what the liberty movement needs to do next.
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.
------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.
------------
all i can say is...
look @ the comments below her own artical.....WHATEVER!!!!
jimboz fight
That's how you get ahead in the left-wing media.
She's a snotty little twat.
-jcr
"The problem with trying to child-proof the world, is that it makes people neglect the far more important task of world-proofing the child." -- Hugh Daniel
Wonkette inspired garbage
Because, on 1/20/09 everything magically changed.
We are no longer at war on two fronts.
The economy is roaring.
Government has shrunk to the same size as 1999.
Yes, I'll have another Kool-Aid, Obama.
Isn't she just the wittiest creature? I guess she didn't notice that after the first few snarky paragraphs, she basically gave readers a rundown on current pro-liberty events. Not a bad piece of corn amongst the sh!t.
=======
"The consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of the ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it."
- Robert E. Lee, 1866
=======
RON PAUL 2012
Sounds like they are petrified.
Things aren't going as smoothly as they had planned. Darn it! Hmm. Did they expect us to just slink away and disappear after the election? Surprise! And gee whiz, our numbers and voices just keep increasing by the minute.
Dr Paul's internet fervor didn't translate into votes, and Obama's did? With a fair and honest election, it would have. But all of the people who supported, donated and voted for RP are still out there, whether their votes were actually counted or not. We're just so "fringy". lol
She can call him, and us, all the names she wants. It won't help. Many people who voted for Obama are now deeply regretting it. And those numbers are growing too. Obamatard Dana needs to deal with it.
Her little hit piece may be insulting, but to me, is inconsequential. :)
With the speed that events
With the speed that events are unfolding, as many have predicted, I suspect there will be many flashpoints emerging across the country. This only brings home the reality that something is very wrong with the establishment and its all-out efforts to deny the populist Ron Paul any political ground or gains. In fact the opposite needs to be true to hold this country together. Goldstein's article reflects a lot of vitriol and fear but offers very little reasoning and productive criticism.
No one believes the lies anymore...
The entire Intelligence Community and various individuals in the Pentagon, the government and international organizations support Ron Paul and our revolution.
It's over for the collectivists.
Acid tongued witch gives me
Acid tongued witch gives me a headache.
What we're doing is working.
What we're doing is working. They're fearful, and feeling the need to strike back.
Agree to an extent
On the one hand she's using the same old establishment tricks of trying to marginalize Paul (and supporters) by characterizing him/them as "fringe." She tosses in the term "Paultards" for good measure. However, I'm very sure if she read her own article back she'd be shocked by aspects of what she wrote. Consider the following quotes:
"Ron Paul was a grassroots sensation and then a media darling."
"Three-quarters of the way through 2009, it is fringy Ron Paul, more so than John McCain or any of his other primary opponents, whose ideology is setting the conservative agenda."
"Ron Paul’s impact is more lasting that many of his critics, on both the right and left, assumed."
The definition of "fringe" has changed and this lady's article sounds like nostalgia for the old days. How can a movement be both "fringe" as well as "setting the conservative agenda"? It can't. There're frayed threads beginning to show from around the edges of the establishment's character assassination of the freedom movement. She's trying to use the same old tricks but is now forced to acknowledge the mainstream impact of liberty. Look at the comments; she's getting ripped to shreds. I say the glass is half full.
She sounds like one of those
She sounds like one of those alien computers that Captain Kirk blows up by getting it to repeat an endless loop of illogical calculations.
Ron Paul Explorer: The All Paul Search Engine
I'm sorry to not agree with you
NOT ONCE did Dana mention H.R. 1207, but she mentions "the fed" several times meaning - The GOVERNMENT UNDER OBAMA, it does NOT mean The Federal Reserve bank to Dana.
Dana is painting Ron Paul as ANTI-GOVERNMENT UNDER OBAMA, and she is making the picture very clear to Liberals:
BE WARNED BE VERY AFRAID OF THESE PEOPLE
Dana believes that Obama is "giving back" returning the fruit of their collective labors to THEM and YOU/RP supporters want the money to go to the rich corporations.
She brings up gun incidents because she wants liberals to think those who bring guns are threatening Obama.
I believe, because she is a writer for Slate/WaPo, that this article as a plant, for Slate to "pick up", which is why it's posted here, stimulate REACTION, which they expect violent and hostil replies, where they can pick the most vile and employ them as examples of Ron Paul.
I wonder how much Dana was paid to write this and by who.
Quote from the article:
In part, Paul’s anti-federal ideology has gained traction because conservatives are incensed by President Obama’s ambitious—and expensive—domestic agenda, from health reform to the federal stimulus to bank bailouts.
What the Democrats are saying:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=...
I think GodWacker made some excellent points on the thread... best post on the thread, and I thank him for sharing this low life hit piece.
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")