Requesting arguments in support of a couple marrying, rather than living together

0 votes

No, I'm not kidding! I'm not trying to offend anyone who's married at all & I don't mean to give you food for thought. After much contemplation, I am trying to find a good reason people should get married. I doubt any arguments from a church pastor is going to convince me. I will attempt to make this PG 13 at most. 1st of all, alot of couples who have children before marriage make the mistake of getting married, either b/c they don't want to be socially frowned upon, pressure from their family, or b/c they want their children to grow up in that kind of environment. The worst thing you can do is marry someone for that reason, there are plenty of couples who have children & have broken up/ never got married & get along much better than those who divorced b/c they didn't have a divorce, a court, a judge, lawyers ruin their relationship. They also didn't have all the personal intimate details of their marriage exposed in the court.

The marriage vows are permanent, lifelong, the 1s I've heard & seen, yet, there is no disclaimer either at the courthouse or at church that the marriage can be dissolved by divorce. Nor is there a disclaimer in the marriage vows. It makes no sense to me that a judge can divorce spouses & yet, most of the time, when the marriage is a religious ceremony, I don't get where the judge has that authority, to separate a religious commitment 2 people have made to each other. They go to the church to get married & a courthouse to end it, not their pastor??? I can understand divorces for courthouse ceremonies, yet there is no disclaimer in the paperwork.

I also don't understand how, when the commitment ends b/c 1 or both spouses initiate it & the other 1 consents how alimony is ever an issue, I can understand child support. When your commitment ends, it just ends, why is alimony even brought up, you're no longer committed to them -- why is 1 spouse entitled to anything further from the other??

Divorces manage to end 1/3 of American marriages, more. Marriage makes you eligible for divorce, you can't get 1 unless you're married. The 1st ? a divorce lawyer asks you is when you got married & if you answer I'm not/ I didn't, you can't get a divorce. He might let you stay in his office for a cup of coffee, but thats the extent of it. I don't suggest anyone go out & get married for the purposes of getting a divorce. Divorce, for that matter, seems to overcome a marriage, it does if 1/3 of Americans get them, even if only 1 gets 1, it has the potential to.

Here's the real dilemma I just can't get past. Marriage is thought to be eternal, a perfect end to a romantic relationship, the best way to transform/ change/ end a relationship/ have a relationship end up. The best thing to turn a relationship into, the perfect solution to a perfect relationship, why then, if that is the case, if every argument in support of marriage was true, why then does divorce even happen? If marriage is just this perfect creation from the church, from the state, from God, from religion, why isn't it divorce proof? If marriage was the way to end a relationship/ the thing to turn a relationship into, why does divorce happen?

Divorce happens b/c divorce is the better choice than marriage in many cases, it happens b/c marriage is not a good choice, if people are happier divorced than married, than divorce, or non-marriage must be a better answer. You don't hear people complaining when they're living together, you just hear them when they're married saying they want a divorce. I'm sure there is paperwork you can fill out so you have protections w/out getting married, so you'll have some kind of assurance that your significant other will not just up & leave you 1 day, so he won't leave you penniless if you've agreed otherwise.

I don't feel marriage is more sacred than living together, couples are just more reluctant to talk about their marriage, it doesn't mean we don't know what goes on behind closed doors that they don't want to talk about. For some reason, it is more publicly accepted that women are pregnant married vs. pregnant single. It's not like the same thing didn't happen, although 1 within the confines of marriage. Married couples are given what is called marital privilege, even though a prerequisite for them getting married was being a couple 1st & its insulting to call a couple a less serious relationship than a marriage/ less of a relationship.

Marriage is expensive & so is divorce. It's cheaper just to live together instead of getting married & married couples live together anyway. Isn't it just more honest not to admit that you're going to be together for the rest of your lives.

On another note, I don't even know what the definition of husband & wife are. I've seen marriage vows, but that doesn't give it & male spouse or married man isn't good enough. I don't even know how marriage has a solid definition, states haven't banned religions & haven't made rules on who can be a clergy, therefore, the state has no say in wedding vows & there are no minimum wedding vows. I'm presuming, therefore, that you can write your own, saying who knows what & you can get married for the weekend. Hmmmm maybe I will get married afterall, just to say that I have. Yes, I've gotten married, no I'm not still married, no I didn't get a divorce. Huhh? Wouldn't so many people who are having marriage problems/ adulterous affairs wish they had gotten married only for a few years/ the weekend?

So, what in the world does marriage really mean, anyhow?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

State Marriage is Polygamy

5 Reasons Why Christians Should Not Obtain a State Marriage License

http://mercyseat.net/BROCHURES/marriagelicense.htm

1. The definition of a "license" demands that we not obtain one to marry. Black’s Law Dictionary defines "license" as, "The permission by competent authority to do an act which without such permission, would be illegal."

2. When you marry with a marriage license, you grant the State jurisdiction over your marriage. When you marry with a marriage license, your marriage is a creature of the State. It is a corporation of the State! Therefore, they have jurisdiction over your marriage including the fruit of your marriage.

3. When you marry with a marriage license, you place yourself under a body of law which is immoral.

4. The marriage license invades and removes God-given parental authority.

5. When you marry with a marriage license, you are like a polygamist. From the State’s point of view, when you marry with a marriage license, you are not just marrying your spouse, but you are also marrying the State.

http://MeetTheTruth.com

Forget The Press, Watch Meet The Truth
http://MeetTheTruth.com <<|

Definition Of Marriage

Marriage is what God joins together. If you are not a Christian it is what the government joins together.

TheKingIsComing

Hindus, Jews, and Muslims get married also.

God joins them together also.

Can't people join themselves together if that is what they want?

Which one?

Which God are you talking about, the God of the Bible?

TheKingIsComing

Are you there Jah? It's me, Ras Trent

----------------
Ron Paul Supporter Since 1997
`Wise people, even though all laws were abolished, would still lead the same life'- Aristophanes -

“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with.” Ron Paul

Jews, Christians, and Muslims all believe in the same God.

Hindus have 330 million gods, so I guess for them it depends.

If you are right

then if God joined all of them together, then anyone else joined together is joined by the government, is that right?

TheKingIsComing

No, not right...

Individuals that don't say "BAAAA" can and do join together just as successfully, if not more successfully, without God or Government.

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

Why?

If you are correct, then they can not legally get married without the government's license.

TheKingIsComing

Marriage is...

when 2 individuals decide between themselves to form a committed relationship in which they share duties and responsibilities. They live together, maybe have children, maybe not. They agree to the rules between themselves.

You don't need the government, you don't need god to be married.

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

If you're an individual instead of a sheep...

Then marriage is what you and your mate decide it is, nobody else.

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

A marriage SHOULD only be necessary if ...

you wish to invite a religious community such as a church to celebrate the union of you and your spouse.

A marriage IS necessary because of its recognized legal status.

In an almost perfect world, there WOULD be no difference between a marriage and a union with the exception that you profess your union in front of God in a marriage and a union would be in the absence of God.

Call it whatever you want, but the difference would and should only be seen by the two individuals that have made the commitment.

WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994

Be an individual...

You don't need the state to recognize your "union". You don't need God to recognize your union. You need to be a responsible individual with the decency and intelligence to know that your children are the most important thing in your life, and you do what's best for them. Make a good life for them with your partner, wife, mate, or whatever you call her/him.

Don't let the state run your life.

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

I agree with that whole heartedly ...

However ...

My wife and I chose to include God in our union.

That is all I am saying.

WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994

to me the only reason marriage is important

is if there are children; then marriage helps establish legal continuity for the child. While childless adults can part with no entanglements, parenting is for life. It is the most sacred of duties to another person, to give your child the best shot at a fulfilling life with love and support and wise, gentle encouragement.
Marriage doesn't guaranty that of course. But it has the potential to offer more stability and support than many single parents can muster.

disagree...

respectfully, of course. See my post immediately below. State sanctioned marriage offers no more security for the kids than one like mine. In fact, couples that stay together because it's too hard to get divorced probably cause more misery for the kids. Being married in the state's eyes does not mean you have more responsibility for the kids, it's the same. If you're not married you are equally responsible for your kids, in both law and morality.

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

And I also meant no disrespect for responsible

parents such as you and your wife. Of course a piece of paper with some bureaucrat's seal doesn't make a difference to those who take parenting very seriously; and I look forward to the day all in our culture are more enlightened.
But for now marriage can offer wider support for the kids, if only by extending their family network: grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins who -- in case something happens to the parents: illness, military assignment, even death -- in some families more readily accept, nurture, support the children of a marriage than those outside one,

Good golly...

Could you have made your question any longer? Didn't get through it, but got the jist in the 1st paragraph.

You DON'T need the state to be 'married'. You and your other half agree that you have a commitment and that you will go by the same rules that other 'married' couples do. You know what they are. Leave the state out of it.

I've been with my 'wife' for 16 years, and have 4 awesome children together. We have no marriage license with the state, but believe me, we are as spiritually married as anybody here. We wear rings. She has my last name, as do our kids of course.

LEAVE UNCLE SAM OUT OF IT!

--------
Fossils Rock!

'Cause there's a monster on the loose

Do we want to live in a civilized world?

1) Women have the goodies.
2) Men want the goodies.
3) This gives women the power to demand men behave responsibly.
(Get a job, stay out of prison)
4) Intelligent women don't give the goodies away without getting a good return on their investment, like marriage, commitment. If a man can just walk away, there's no commitment.
5) It should be remembered adult males and females do not live together in the chimpanzee and gorilla world. Adult males only come around when it's time to multiply.
6) Do we want to revert to their way of life?
7) Stable marriages are the rock of civilization. Our society doesn't believe this, but the most important roles are mother and father. They are raising the future. every child needs a mother and father who are married with all living under the same roof.
This was not a religious argument.

The answer is complex

First, I don't believe anyone should get married unless they truly believe it is a God-given expectation and blessing. In the beginning God saw that man alone was not good so Eve was created for Adam and Adam for Eve. They complemented each other. If you believe this, then you believe that marriage is a blessing, not a curse. Also, marriage is an announcement and pledge to your partner, in front of witnesses, that you will do all that your vows say you will do. It is a public ceremony to announce a contract that you have made, which binds you to that contract. It doesn't sound very romantic but it is supposed to be an assurance to the other person that they are that important to you that you would never forsake them and you hold them above all others. Marriage, in the ideal sense, is wonderful. Who wouldn't want the security of knowing there is some very special person who loves you that much?

Second, marriages lasted in the past because they had to. Partners relied upon one another. They didn't have the State willing to step in and pay their bills, if they chose to bail out. The had a farm and responsibilities that could not be done alone. They needed each other to survive. So, even if they didn't get along perfectly, they stuck together. Was it ideal? Probably not in a lot of cases. But our grandparents are evident that it can be very special.

Third, I believe modern-day media in the form of TV, movies, music and books have done a great job of giving people the impression that marriage is one long honeymoon. When the girl wakes up to find that it is not, then she becomes disillusioned. The young man wakes up to find that she doesn't always have nice breath and has mood swings. Off they go to find another because the media tells them they have a right to and romance is the ultimate pursuit.

People don't get married for the right reasons anymore. They don't marry wisely but their hormones more often drive them to. As long as this keeps happening, divorce will keep happening. Also, the State stepping in and taking care of your responsibilities and also imposing their rules on you can make it easier. People are basically very selfish and agape love is a very rare thing.

I love being married because it says we are family. I married my husband and his children. You see, I have done this more than once and know from whence I speak. When I married for the right reasons, it became a tremendous blessing. Not always easy, as others have mentioned, but definitely worth it.

Healthnut4freedom

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct thy paths." Proverbs 3:5,6

Healthnut4freedom

The lip of truth shall be established forever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment...Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are His delight. Prov 12:19,22

Marriage actually makes giving a child a last name

much easier. I do not believe most males would like it if the mother decided to give the child her maiden name now would they. If she is not married to him, she has every right to do so from what I understand.

Agree with Attilas. A couple's choice these days.

I have seen many couples who could not stay married to each other, but end up living together unmarried and happy. Also, couples who have been together for decades unmarried and happy. There are also people who first lived together for 1-2 years, got married, and then divorced after just a few months.

Two independent computers (people), should agree on what they want or don't want. I'm making it sound too easy, it sometimes isn't.

Another consideration that no one discusses is a marriage with a mutually agreed upon expiration date. It would take both people to renew.

In Biblical times, people did not live very long. Now a days, our life span is far greater and so are the life experiences. People have decades to change and that change may either be in the same or vastly different directions.

Food for thought.

Marriage is a religious institution. If you don't believe that sex outside of marriage is sinful, then why would you get married? Go on using each other and enjoy having a live-in concubine under a "hand shake" agreement until you get bored. This usually leads to loneliness and illegitimate children, but if all that you are looking out for is #1, then by all means....

"This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave."

... then by all means ...

... what?

BTW, is your question(?) from the male, or female perspective?

Wrong Reason To Get Married

I have heard statistics that say that people that shack up and then get married just to be married or just to make thier grandmas happy usually leads to divorce and everyone ends up unhappy.

Worse it provides a excuse to stick with each other and have kids with the thinking being that you will eventlually learn to love each other when it fact the relationship only has one meaningful aspect - in the bedroom - but no other shared interests. So getting married only prolongs the agony until both eventually figure out that they were not meant for each other.

I would think this problem would be worse during an economic downturn since there is even more incentive to live together.

Luke 20:34

from our Lord

TheKingIsComing

I'm way to selfish to get married

We all change though.

Repent, for the reign of YaHUaH is near!

Cheers for honesty....

I respect you. Wish more people as honest.

"This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave."

this is a very personal decision.

I would marry my husband again every day.

But for others it is better to stay single or just live together.

Very individual.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"God is at home, it's we who have gone out for a walk."
Meister Eckhart

Community Property laws VS Individual Property Rights.

To me, that is the real issue. Once you marry, you and your spouse's property (if enough time passes) falls into community property. All new property bought during marriage also falls inot community property. Children also fall under a quasi community property status. Divorce then becomes the process of becoming an individual again with individual property. She gets half or more, he gets a third, and the attorneys take a third... or at least that is how I see the real world working. Next, children go with the mom (for better or worse). Even in "equal" sharing of the parenting, there is such a thing as the primary residence of the children, the primary caretaker, the person who says, "I want them to get the flue shot" and if you don't, then you'll find the courts have ruled its not so equal cause the primary caretaker parent gets to have the last say -- even if that primary caretaker parent is only having the kids over their house 4 months out of the year....

So for me, marriage a bad bargin.

A better bargin would be to stay NOT MARRIED, yet married in everyother way. When children come, be sure to be the LEGAL parent at birth.

The problem with Marriage is that it is a ONE SIZE CONTRACT that FITS ALL kind of deal. Which is terrible in the sense that as in all relationships different things are agreed to and worked out. Contracts in all other areas of life are UNIQUELY made and worked out to FIT those two (or three or more) parties needs. Yet Government's marriage contract is a one size fits all deal. And it is the only one "Legally Recognized" --- effectively saying that any and all other privately negotiated marriage contracts are null and void. Effectively forcing everyone into the COMMUNITY PROPERTY Law system.

So the only way to avoid that, is to NOT get married and instead do what the gays have been doing for a long time: Make your own private Marriage Cerimony and Private Contract and have that witness among good Friends. Decide on a private Marriage Contract Decider should anything go south (a private judge really).

Gays have had lots of success with this.

Now all other issues such as hospital visitation and so forth can be handled by one page specific private Power of Attoney agreements. Hence, if I go to the hospital I designate Jim Peters to manage all my affairs and I specifically give him permission to visit me in the hospital for any and support, even 'spousal-like' support.

Just a thought....

Now the hard part....

Finding a libertarian female who will think the same way, and FEEL the same way.

The hardest part is the psychological part -- FEELING MARRIED when everything in society works against you to tell you you two are not married. Same with those who choose to have two wives and husband. How the 3 of them must work hard to FEEL married in a world that works against them.

Christianity VS ISLAM is in my view.... a battle over this area -- societal sanction of plural marriage as acceptable. Mankind has solved the problem of human sexuality in two ways, Legalized Monogomy via Marriage and Legalized Polygamy via Marriage. Culturally speaking these two legal systems cannot live side by side, and have not lived side by side historically. What happens in the West, that is if the West starts to LEGALIZE polygamy, then Islam will be in real trouble as it finds itself slowly absorbed culturally into the West. But the West has been active in stamping out polygamy (see the history of the Mormon faith in America) and recall recently Texas and its treatment of thousands of Texas citizens, bording them on busses with Children taken and men and woman separated out....... only based on an unsupstanitated acusation of child molestation (gee does that happen to whole nonmormon towns?) .

In peace & liberty,
Treg