This is exactly what we were afraid of! Alex Jones publishes fake interview of President Obama with Charlie Sheen!

0 votes

What did many of us say? The MSM is going to destroy all the work done promoting the truth movement. Well done AJ! Sad!

http://www.examiner.com/x-9341-Manhattan-Headlines-Examiner~...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is EXACTLY what you were afraid of?

Really? You saw this coming? Im really shocked at all the people that are upset by this... im thinking this is genius. The interview HAD TO BE FAKE... because Obama would never agree to this is real life... but maybe at least know he has to acknowledge it. This fictional interview was a stroke of genius

http://www.jbs.org/
Semper Fortis

http://www.jbs.org/
Semper Fortis

ADRIANNE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, I mean, WOLVERINES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please, if they had released the parody interview on YouTube first, you would have thought it was the most clever stunt in the history of media.

I'm betting that a mock video of the interview was filmed, but they released the script, beforehand. Probably a mistake, but, they wanted the bibliography to be available to the debunkers. The sources provided are pretty rock solid.

As for the "proper" way to hit the masses in the face with the 911 pie?
WHERE'S YOUR BIG IDEA ???????

This weekend I showed the clips of BLDG 7 to a very well educated in-law who had NEVER seen, nor heard of BLDG 7. He was shocked. He began to ask many of the same questions that Charlie presents in the interview. The first question he had...:"Why haven't I ever seen the video of that implosion on FoxNews?" I replied, "They just haven't gotten around to it...not really a priority...besides, it's only been 8 years."

He looked like a Madoff investor...stunned.

Nobody wants to hear that their government murdered fellow citizens.
Obviously, after too many years, there still hasn't been any investigation. Well...we're running out of time. Martial law is a just a raindrop away.
Something drastic had to be done. This stunt may actually work.

If I, like Charlie, made $500K per week, I'm not sure that I would put it all on the line for a bunch of sheeple zombies who deserve whatever they get.

BTW- There would be no RonPaul ReLoveUtion without AJ.

PERIOD !

There ain't a video version of the interview on the way...

Oh, well. No video spoof interview that goes with the script.
I asked a person, "in the know". Woulda been cool.
: (

'WE'? Who is 'WE'?

Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Who are you referring to when you say 'we'?

hmmm

I really don't understand all this noise about that story.
I really don't.

The mainsteam medias are going to take advantage of the story maybe but who cares ?
A huge proportion of people on this planet don't buy the official version anymore.

Let the MSM of the world support the official version so everyone that has woken up will not buy their other propagandas so easily.
Let them support the official version, let them lose their audience and the little credibility they have left.

Hold off on the criticism for a bit

This is a guerrilla marketing campaign
The fact that there is press is the key because the real message is embedded in the article
even the examiner' writer had to admit that the "story" contained quite a lot of
good content
lets see how this plays out

remember that this was drooped right before 911 in order to throw a speed bump in any Gov't plans to white wash history
can you imagine the amount of kids that are going to ask about the 6 out of 10 commissioners did not agree with the 911 commission findings
hopefully this goes viral

also in Jones defense he did say the day before he launched this campaign that" this was the biggest thing" they had ever done
as soon as I heard him call his big event a thing, then I knew it was a guerrilla campaign.
www.Umake.it - The online resource for the Hand Made Society

I do not agree at all

It is the tactic that I think is wrong, pure and simple. A lie is a lie is a lie is a lie, etc. One will NEVER be a proper advocate for TRUTH by telling lies. Call it "spin" call it "marketing" call it for the greater good" and... YOU HAVE BECOME THE ENEMY.

I do not appreciate being lied to, I will not trust people who lie to me, and I will not "hold off" on dissociating myself from liars. If AJ would like to apologize to me and everyone like me, who were DELIBERATELY led to believe that the 9-11 conspiracy had just had a major breakthrough, and DELIBERATELY made to send false information to our loved ones, I would at least consider him someone who was willing to try to correct mistakes. Instead, he deletes our comments and carries on as if he, the almighty AJ, can spin truth from lies.

No, I do not trust him and frankly, I have a problem with people who defend such behavior.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

Well said

I'm surprised people are jumping on the bandwagon and actually promoting the Charlie Sheen fake interview/request to meet Obama thing.

I will never take AJ seriously again.

I think you misunderstood my position Paul4won

I did not mention anything about supporting this endeavor, however I do see it for what it is - a guerrilla campaign
As a matter of fact I generally don't support what most marketers do on a daily basis - but of course my opinion of what other people do is largely irrelevant.
The worst part of a campaign like this is that you have to admit that the advertising aspect of it has worked well so far... That is to say it got a lot of attention - kinda like when a guy breaks onto an olympic skating event in a tutu in order to advertise for online poker.
Based on your posts that I have read over the months, I imagine that you have a very good understanding of the 911 issue - this campaign is clearly not targeted towards you, or I for that matter.
Finally, with regards to you have a problem with me personally - oh well -

www.Umake.it - The online resource for the Hand Made Society

Agree

"Get to the choppa!"

"Get to the choppa!"

My sentiments exactly

Thank you, Paul4won, for refusing to be conned.

Also, this was Charlies

Also, this was Charlies idea, not Alex.
If you want to bash someone please move your anger towards him.

~~
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for the rest of his life.
Teach a man to phish and he'll clean out your bank account.
~~

There is no anger for either, but I no longer trust them

Their behavior is inexcusable in a TRUTH movement. I guess there are people who want 9-11 exposed at all costs, and there are those of us who cherish TRUTH.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

"This is exactly what we

"This is exactly what we were afraid of!"
Who are "we"? Please don´t make us a group that think exactly the same on everything. And who says AJ represents the entire movement because that is what it sounds like here. It is of individuals, not one individual.

~~
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for the rest of his life.
Teach a man to phish and he'll clean out your bank account.
~~

Jones is a

total douche bag! What a punk ass move he pulled with this Sheen crap! He has just lost all (if any) credibility that he had with me. I can't even send out links to the decent articles on his websites. If you want anybody to listen to you about the important issues please don't ever mention his name of send his links.

This guy is a tool.

If it's meant to be it's up to WE!

If it's meant to be it's up to WE!

It says its not real right

It says its not real right in AJ's article. Sheen wrote up an open letter to Obama in the form of an interview taking place, AJ posted the text of that open letter and included a disclaimer saying it was not real. He also posted up another article right before posting the "20 Minutes" text describing Sheen's letter.

Here's the disclaimer from the "20 Minutes" article:

Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.

This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.

Charlie Sheen.

Position and presense

Early yesterday morning that disclaimer WAS NOT on the "interview". Many people that read the "interview" did not see the disclaimer as it wasn't there.

The disclaimer should've been at the top of the story when it was initially put up.

It says right in the article

It says right in the article that Alex posted that it is NOT real. AND, its pretty obvious that its not real, I mean Charlie Sheen requests a 20 min interview with the president to talk about 9/11 and GETS IT?! Hahah, you'd have to be really slow. Not only that but several news releases went out today announcing that Charlie Sheen had issued an open letter to Barack Obama called "20 Minutes with the president". The writer of that Examiner article is either slow, ignorant, or purposefully trying to attack AJ.

Alex Jones is a fool

He's like 33 years old, and he's been talking about these grandiose conspiracy theories for half his life. Sorry guys, being 33 years old doesn't afford you enough perspective on life and modern US history as say a 74 yr old Ron Paul. 33 years old these days is like still being a kid. This guy has no perspective of history and is just in it for the entertainment.

Anyone who's been duped by this jackass you deserved it.

What does it mean to a talk show host to be in a position where

he can never say again; "We have a REALLY BIG show lined up". It will find its way into the fringe lexicon. "Is it actually big ...or is it "Alex Jones" "big" ?

Google "20 Minutes with the President"

It returns with 80,700,000 hits...

This was a genius move. I'm ecstatic because it raises new evidence and many unanswered questions. It even brings up the fact Obama is continuing Bush policies.

I admit I was fooled til I read the disclaimer but the move was brilliant.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

“Liberty without learning is always in peril... and learning without liberty is always in vain”

- John Fitzgerald Kennedy

=====================================

"The greatest mystery of all is truth." - Me, 2009

Yes it was a brilliant move !

And it couldnt come at a better time with BO birthcertificate issue comming to trial the msm will use this issue to lash out at the bush administration in order to try to keep the bc issue off the front page which will cause right hate radio to pick up on the birthcertificate issue in order to defend the bush administration .Another words all HELL is fixing to break loose.Gotta hand it to Alex he s playing the media like a fiddle.

for those who got duped by AJ

shouldve listened to bill cooper theydontseethroughus.blogspot.com/.../is-alex-jones-disinformation-agent.html -

and that would have prevented us from taking at face value

an article written by Charlie Sheen with no disclaimer? Sorry. We got sucker punched. End of story.

I sure saw a

I sure saw a disclamer...

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

Believe it or not

The disclaimer was added after the story was out for over an hour. As evidence, look at the first 200 comments...NONE of them remark on the disclaimer. After that, it begins.

Okay, so what's the problem, an hour with 200 comments?

That means for the past 30 hours the other 80 million reads DID see the disclaimer and the news still went viral. I can understand some peope feeling conned, well at least those that saw it the first hour, but look at the big picture....

Orson Wells pulled a similiar con and he is considered a genius.

lol Ron Paul doesn't trick to get attention

likewise Peter Schiff too, they have truth on their side

these two guys are like the great sages to my personal movement

he also doesnt go anywhere

he also doesnt go anywhere near 9/11

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

He would support a new invetigation and that is what these

two are asking for.