0 votes

Ron Paul: Making America Safer Since 9/11/2001

Here is a list of speeches and resolutions by Ron Paul which he made in the House of Representatives in regard to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. We can all be proud of the fact that Dr. Paul has not wasted his or our time trying to swat holographic missiles from our skies or promoting other irrational ideas like "they hate us for our freedom."

Ron Paul has consistently promoted legislation that will keep America safe and strong for years to come -- all in accordance with the US Constitution. We wouldn't have it any other way.

Thank you, Dr. Paul


October 8, 2004

The 9-11 Intelligence Bill: More Bureaucracy, More Intervention, Less Freedom

"Immediately after the attack on September 11, 2001, I introduced several pieces of legislation designed to help fight terrorism and secure the United States, including a bill to allow airline pilots to carry firearms and a bill that would have expedited the hiring of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) translators to support counterterrorism investigations and operations. I also introduced a bill to authorize the president to issue letters of marque and reprisal to bring to justice those who committed the attacks of September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future."

See: http://www.house.gov/list/speech/tx14_paul/WarSupp.shtml

More below

January 7, 2002


The terrible events of September 11th brought the issue of immigration reform squarely into the public spotlight. Most of the terrorist hijackers involved in the attacks were in the country illegally, having gained entrance using student visas that had later expired. The INS now admits that potentially tens of millions of aliens in the country are unaccounted for, many having simply disappeared after passing through customs. This in turn leads to fears that numerous terrorist cells may be operating within the U.S. and plotting future acts of terror. No amount of military might used abroad does us much good if the American people are not safe in their own communities.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2004/cr100804.htm

LET PRIVATEERS TROLL FOR BIN LADEN -- HON. RON PAUL (Extensions of Remarks - December 04, 2001)

Mr. Speaker, I recommend my colleagues read the attached article ``Let Privateers Troll for Bin Laden'' by Larry Sechrest, a research fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California, and a professor of economics at Sul Ross State University. Professor Sechrest documents the role privateers played in the war against pirates who plagued America in the early days of the Republic. These privateers often operated with letters of marque and reprisal granted by the United States Congress....

(by Larry J. Sechrest)
In the wake of the Sept. 11th attacks, a group of American businessmen has decided to enlist the profit motive to bring the perpetrators to justice. Headed by Edward Lozzi of Beverly Hills, California, the group intends to offer a bounty of $1 billion--that's billion with a ``b''--to any private citizens who will capture Osama bin Laden and his associates, dead or alive.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr120401.htm

November 5, 2001

U.S. Taxpayers send Billions to our Enemies in Afghanistan

Even before September 11th, most Americans were well aware of the hostility that many Middle Eastern nations have for the U.S. Our experiences with Iran, Libya, Iraq, and now Afghanistan have understandably soured many Americans on the entire region. Indeed, the majority of anti-American sentiment in the post-Cold War era originates in the Middle East. What many Americans don't realize, however, is the extent to which their own foreign aid tax dollars are spent funding our current and future enemies in the region.

We should recognize that American tax dollars helped to create the very Taliban government that now wants to destroy us. In the late 1970s and early 80s, the CIA was very involved in the training and funding of various fundamentalist Islamic groups in Afghanistan, some of which later became today's brutal Taliban government. In fact, the U.S. government admits to giving the groups at least 6 billion dollars in military aid and weaponry, a staggering sum that would be even larger in today's dollars.

Bin Laden himself received training and weapons from the CIA, and that agency's military and financial assistance helped the Afghan rebels build a set of encampments around the city of Khost. Tragically, those same camps became terrorist training facilities for Bin Laden, who uses some of the same soldiers our military once trained as lieutenants in his sickening terrorist network. Our heroic pilots are now busy bombing the same camps we paid to build, all the while threatened by the same Stinger missiles originally supplied by our CIA. Once again, the stark result of our foreign aid, however well-intentioned, was the arming and training of forces that later become our enemy.

Our foolish funding of Afghan terrorists hardly ended in the 1980s, however. Millions of your tax dollars continue to pour into Afghanistan even today. Our government publicly supported the Taliban right up until September 11. Already in 2001 the U.S. has provided $125 million in so-called humanitarian aid to the country, making us the world's single largest donor to Afghanistan. Rest assured the money went straight to the Taliban, and not to the impoverished, starving residents that make up most of the population. Do we really expect a government as intolerant and anti-west as the Taliban to use our foreign aid for humane purposes? If so, we are incredibly naive; if not, we foolishly have been seeking to influence a government that regards America as an enemy.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2001/tst110501.htm

Reject UN Gun Control

The September 11th terrorist attacks only made matters worse for gun control advocates, as millions of Americans were starkly reminded that we cannot rely on government to protect us from criminals.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2003/tst092203.htm

TSA- Bullies at the Airport

November 29, 2004

TSA was created in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Although the National Guard, DOD, FBI, CIA, NSA, and FAA utterly failed to protect American citizens on that tragic day, federal legislators immediately proposed creating yet another government agency.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2004/tst112904.htm

Constitutional Responses to Terrorism

It has been over 6 years since the atrocities of September 11 were committed and there are still some very basic measures that need to be taken to bring the perpetrators to justice and make America safer. I have proposed legislation to help with these efforts and will continue to fight in Congress for the safety and security of the American people.

My legislation entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216) makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our mission to capture Bin Laden. Our military has been pursuing him without result for far too long now, and it is high time ALL constitutional tools were utilized in the hunt for this dangerous madman. As an American it sickens me to know that Bin Laden and top leaders of al Qaeda remain at large and thumbing their noses at us, while we unravel the sacred fabric of our constitution out of fear. It is Osama Bin Laden and the perpetrators of terrorist attacks that ought to be afraid of us, not the other way around. The answers are found in the Constitution. We should boldly root out the perpetrators and not let them get away with their crimes against us. As the home of the brave we should use Letters of Marque and Reprisal to bring Bin Laden to justice.

Also, we need to take serious steps to prevent terrorists from gaining easy access to targets on our soil. Quite alarmingly, even with the knowledge that the 19 terrorist hijackers entered our country legally, and that 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia , student visas from terrorist sponsoring countries are still far too easily obtained. In a baffling move President Bush struck a deal with Saudi King Abdullah in 2005 to allow 21,000 more Saudi young men into the US on student Visas. Of course, not all students from terror sponsoring countries are terrorists, but I place a higher premium on the security of the American people than the convenience of citizens of hostile countries. We should not be making the goals of would-be terrorists easier to accomplish, but rather should be vigilant about defending against enemies at every turn. They should not be slipping through our doors so easily, using our immigration laws against us, and that is why I proposed the Terror Immigration Elimination Act (HR 3217) to toughen standards for VISAS from countries on the State Department's list of terrorist sponsoring countries in addition to Saudi Arabia . Just as you decide who to invite to a dinner party in your home, we should be in charge of who we allow in this country, without apology.

A lot has been done to fight the War on Terror and much of it has been misdirected, but there are some tools still needed and more progress to be made. My bills The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 and The Terror Immigration Elimination Act are logical steps in the right direction.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2008/tst012008.htm

On Illegal Immigration and Border Security

Illegal immigration is on the forefront of many Americans’ minds lately and with good reason. The Center for Immigration Studies has recently reported that our immigrant population is now 37 million, up from 27 million in 1997. 1 in 3 of these immigrants are here illegally. We have a problem that has exploded in the last 10 years with no appreciable change in border security since September 11 when we were supposed to take a hard look at the problem.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst120207.htm

October 12, 2001

Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the shocking attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have reminded us all that the primary responsibility of the federal government is to protect the security and liberty of our nation's citizens. Therefore, we must do what we can to enhance the ability of law enforcement to prevent future terrorist attacks. For example, the federal government can allow enhanced data-sharing among federal agencies that deal with terrorism. The federal government should also forbid residents of countries which sponsor terrorism from receiving student visas as well as prohibit residents of terrorist countries from participating in programs which provide special privileges to immigrants. In fact, I have introduced my own anti-terrorism legislation, the Securing American Families Effectively (SAFE) Act, which strengthens the ability of law enforcement to track down and prosecute suspected terrorists as well as keep potential terrorists out of the country.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr101201.htm


"Common sense dictates that we should not be handing out new visas to residents of countries that don’t cooperate with our State department in fighting terrorism," Paul stated. "Most of the criminals who carried out the September 11 attacks entered the country using student visas, so we hardly should continue to open our doors to students from places like Iraq. If we are serious about conducting a war on terrorism, we cannot simultaneously give aid and comfort to our enemies, including the aid and comfort of living in the United States."

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2002/pr070202.htm

Congressman Ron Paul
January 24, 2002, in the House of Representatives

The Case for Defending America

When we aided Osama bin Laden in the 1980s, he was a member of the Mujahidien, and they were the freedom fighters waging a just war against the Soviet Army. A broad definition of terrorism outside the understanding of "those who attack the United States" opens a Pandora's box in our foreign policy commitments.

If we concentrate on searching for all terrorists throughout the world and bombing dozens of countries, but forget to deal with the important contributing factors that drove those who killed our fellow citizens, we will only make ourselves more vulnerable to new attacks.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr012402.htm

November 1, 2001

We appropriated $40 billion dollars in the wake of September 11, and I supported that measure as legitimate compensation for individuals and companies harmed by the failure of the federal government to provide national defense.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr110101.htm

Congressman Ron Paul
U.S. House of Representatives
July 26, 2002

Statement on Homeland Security Vote

Mr. Speaker, the move to create a federal Department of Homeland Security was initiated in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11 and subsequent revelations regarding bureaucratic bungling and ineptness related to those attacks. Leaving aside other policy initiatives that may be more successful in reducing the threat of future terror attacks, I believe the President was well-intentioned in suggesting that a streamlining of functions might be helpful.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr072602.htm

June 23, 2004

Spending Billions on our Failed Intelligence Agencies

It may be unfair that we only hear about the intelligence community’s failures and shortcomings, but we cannot help but be concerned over so many such failures in recent years. Despite the tens of billions we spend on these myriad intelligence agencies, it is impossible to ignore the failure of the intelligence community to detect and prevent the September 11, 2001 attacks.


The 9-11 Commission Charade

The Commissioners recommend the government spend billions of dollars spreading pro-US propaganda overseas, as if that will convince the world to love us. What we have forgotten in the years since the end of the Cold War is that actions speak louder than words. The US didn't need propaganda in the captive nations of Eastern Europe during the Cold War because people knew us by our deeds. They could see the difference between the United States and their Soviet overlords. That is why, given the first chance, they chose freedom. Yet everything we have done in response to the 9-11 attacks, from the Patriot Act to the war in Iraq, has reduced freedom in America. Spending more money abroad or restricting liberties at home will do nothing to deter terrorists, yet this is exactly what the 9-11 Commission recommends.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2004/tst082304.htm


Does an invasion of Iraq play into bin Laden’s hands by turning the entire Islamic world against us? Will an Iraq war expand into a Middle East war against Israel? Will Islamic terrorists mount attacks in America and around the world to protest the war?

If we are justified in attacking Iraq, what about the dozens of other countries that pose much more of a threat to us? Why aren’t the war hawks calling for an invasion of Iran or especially Saudi Arabia, which harbored most of the September 11th terrorists?

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2002/tst090302.htm

October 22, 2001

U.S. Armed Forces Should Protect American Soil

The sober reality is that on September 11th millions of foreigners abroad were better protected by American armed forces than were our own citizens at home. In fact, on that fateful morning we had tens of thousands of soldiers and billions of dollars in weapons deployed worldwide- all standing by helplessly while our citizens were savagely attacked in New York and Washington. It is beyond frustrating to consider that there are literally dozens of places around the globe where an unauthorized commercial jet straying off course would have been confronted by American fighters, yet the New York skyline and even the Pentagon were left almost completely unprotected. The American people have a right to know, for example, why the Iraq-Kuwait border, the DMZ between North and South Korea, and the skies over Serbia were better defended that morning than our own cities, borders, and skies.

See: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2001/tst102201.htm

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nano Nano

Amazing discovery by Danish researchers:

I can't resist

WE ARE CHANGE asks Ron Paul about why he doesn't come out with the truth about 9/11.

See for yourself.

Start at :50.

ron paul : "what if the

ron paul : "what if the american people woke up and understood that the official reasons for going to war are almost always based on lies and promoted by war propaganda in order to serve special interests"


for the back-up.

I think there is a great disparity between how RP thinks and how many of these non-Truthers think. They trust government more than he does. They aren't even aware of how shaky the Official Story is.

9/11 Commission Chairmen complain: CIA "Stonewalled Us"

Great thread but he has been trying for DECADES. TY for Posting!

"Hell is truth seen too late...duty neglected in its season."- Tryon Edwards

"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."

Great Idea for a thread

Want a solution to make sure it does not happen again America, read these speeches and open your mind.

Getting Ready for 2012!

EU MP says,

"Part of US government and Congress lied” about 9/11



Is 9/11 Closed Or Do You Support A New Investigation?

Flip flop?

I support Paul's no nonsense views, but he exhibits quite a bit of indecision regarding 911.
When asked in the 2008 presidential candidacy debate about his supporters who are "911 truthers", he states "I've abandoned those viewpoints (re: the non-official theories) and I don't believe that, and that's all, thats the only thing that's important".


He stated directly that he does NOT support any 911 truthers.

So why do his supporters here still cling to him as being a beacon for 911 truth?


for others.

"We can see with our eyes, hear with our ears and feel with our touch, but we understand with our hearts."

Bump for great floor speaches

"We have to spend money to keep from going bankrupt"
Joseph Biden VP , USA

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell

Hey Hydro

They are very thoughtful speeches. Common sense can be so refreshing -- especially in Congress.


bump for honesty



Thank you

You're Welcome

Of course, I couldn't have done it without Dr. Paul.


Thanks for the bump.




Thanks for reading -- all bumps are appreciated -- let's send out a little love to Dr. Paul for trying to keep us safe and free.

A great collection

All in one place.
I propose we all spend some time reading through these.
Pick out a few of your favorite sections. And remind people about the uncommon sanity of Ron Paul. Cut and paste your favorites into discussions all over the internet.
There will be a lot of 9-11 talk over the next day or two. Make sure people see what they missed out on. America really blew it.

"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.

Also Wanted to Mention

I collected these by doing a google search on:

site:house.gov/paul "September 11"

Got about six pages and looked through those. So there could be more material along these lines to be found using somewhat different search criteria.

The items listed are not in chronological order. I copied and pasted them in the order in which they turned up in the search results.

Hey TC

I find the most fascinating of these proposals to be the letters of marque and reprisal. At first blush it sounds so antiquated and unrealistic.

But with bin Laden afoot in the porous border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan, letters of marque make a lot of sense. It would be much easier for some local warlord who knows the area and exercises control to find bin Laden than trying to find him with a regiment of Western soldiers.

I don't know how much we've spent on the various wars and "homeland security," I do know that Iraq has cost over $2 billion a week for over six years, so the grand total for all the wars has to be at least $1 trillion.

How much money would we have had to put on bin Laden's head to guarantee his capture? Would an offer of $1 billion bring him in? How about $10 billion or $100 billion? Hell, I'd turn in my Aunt Shirley for $100 billion dollars.

It seems reasonable to me to assume that bin Laden would have been captured in short order if letters of marque had been issued and such rewards offered. It would have been far less expensive than all these wars, about a million innocent Muslim would still be alive and the US would have a far better reputation in the world.

That Ron Paul is a pretty smart guy after all.