Popular Mechanics "debunks" the swine flu
Submitted by PresidentRich on Fri, 09/11/2009 - 23:01Has anyone seen this article?
Just reading over it quickly, it seems like a pretty week debunking to me.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health_medicine/4330...
»
You forgot to apply the "reversal code". It's for liars.
The reversal code as it applies to Popu-liar Mechanics, reverses whatever they say so you know what's true.
So for instance;
The facts: "There's absolutely no evidence that this was created by a human hand," says William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University.
With the reversal code application;
The facts: "There's absolutely unquestionable evidence that this was created by a human hand," says William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University.
I hope that helps. You must have been really perplexed when you didn't know about the reversal code. A 5th grader knows the same bio-engineered virus can't appear on 5 continents all in the same week.
Oh and here's a little more science
Dr. Bill Deagle on the Swine Flu Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9VytrC8An4&feature=channel_page
~~~~~~~~~~~~~>>>>
"Is Anybody Out There?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXaXV2OZmLw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2...
✰VIDEO! 2012 Is About Abolishing Economic Slavery In America ✰ http://www.dailypaul.com/209377/2012-is-about-abolishing-eco...
The very first one is incorrect.
While the virus may not be man-made intentionally.
Most of the yearly flu strains are created BECAUSE of man.
People create the recombination incubators by keeping livestock of different species in close proximity to each other.
"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k
True.
I stopped reading Popular Mechanics when they debunked inertia for 9/11. After that incredible stretch of disbelief, why bother....lol
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~
Agreed. The publication lost
Agreed. The publication lost all credibility in my eyes when, in its effort to debunk 9/11 conspiracy theories, it ignored a lot of the most prominent and scientifically irrefutable inconsistencies with respect to the official 9/11 story
"Facts do not cease to exist because you choose to ignore them."
But Popular Mechanics sure will cease to exist if we ignore it!