Permanent RFID Bracelet for the Vaccinated?

I hope I never have kids, I wouldn't want to have to raise them in the slave state that America has turned into.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The darkhorse candidate for the Kentucky Senate Dr Rand Paul a Constitutional Republican has proven to be more than a distraction
http://will86aber.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/a-legacy-of-freed...

I originally typed this up a couple of weeks ago as a response to the Boston bracelet thread, but never finished it and never posted it as I got side-tracked in researching other issues that are more imminently and seriously pressing (the American Police Force issue, for example). Please keep that in mind as you read the following...


While I have absolutely no doubt that the "type" of scenario suggested in the video is planned and will happen, likely in the near future, and while I have no doubt that this type of scenario is only one of many that are planned, and while I am convinced that such plans have been in place since (and even before) the foundation of our country, I'm not sure I believe this particular prediction. A scenario like that outlined in the video, in my opinion, won't be the "end-game". I think it would more likely serve as a pilot program in selected areas on a small scale (Boston is only a fraction of the country) to test the waters of what the people will accept, and to practice for full implementation on a large scale, possibly with different tracking devices, at a later time. I also have good reason to believe that the bracelet test program, using health threat scare tactics as a cattle prod, is actually much more about tracking and controlling the masses for reasons of finance and banking control in the future than it is about any pandemic. I believe that the Boston bracelet program is part of something sinister, but is not, in and of itself, sinister. If the people of Boston allow the program to be mostly successful, the program will be pointed to when needed as a precedence and a model for future next steps on an increasingly-widening and more oppressive scale.


I have done preliminary research on the poster of the video (looking at patterns and subjects of other videos she has posted and following other conversations she's had in effort to understand her overall mindset and credibility), on the device displayed in the video (and it's function), on the company that makes the device, on other devices made by the company and on legislation/ordinances for any kind of punishment for refusing to accept the bracelets.


As I said, I've only had time to do preliminary research at the time of this writing, but here are my findings so far:

• Video poster's credibility: The jury is still out. I don't think she's fabricating her claims. I think she really believes them, and for that I give her a lot of respect as a patriot willing to risk her well being to warn countrymen. However, I think that perhaps, because she is, as are many others, aware that some form of mass population control and oppression in the works, she's potentially incorrectly piecing together smaller details of a bigger picture, somewhat driven by a level of anxiety that appears to be above that of others who are aware of a dark,impending future. I'll know more after I contact her. I do know, for now, that she doesn't understand the device she cited and I would think that military/law enforcement personnel should have decent training on how to use the device and what it can be used for.




• Device in question: Simply a marker beacon (essentially a bright infrared strobe light, only visible to night vision and I/R sensors). Watch the manufacturer's product overview videos. Although it could be used for other purposes, its intended use it to help troops identify where other troops and resources are in the dark without any personally-identifiable information on a wide scale basis, and without transmitting any light visible to the naked eye. In order for the device to transmit unique, personally-identifiable information, the I/R light would have to be modulated in some way, and a corresponding demodulator device would be required to read/interpret the transmission. While there are devices capable of transmitting unique information via infrared light, the device cited by the poster of the video is not one such device, and I have verified this with an engineer who actually works on the device. More about that below.




• Manufacturer of device in question: Before I get into too much detail here, PLEASE heed this preface! I called the manufacturer and had no trouble getting right through to an engineer (the engineer answered the phone when I selected option 1 for "sales" on the phone transfer system). I get the impression that the manufacturer is not a very large company. Let me say that I am shocked, impressed and respectful of how forthcoming the engineer was with information without really even knowing me from Adam. I do not want to get this engineer into any particular trouble (which is why I won't cite his/her name). Also, I realize that many of you will require your own verification of whether or not what I'm saying is true here, so some of you will be inclined to contact the manufacturer as I did. That is fine, but PLEASE understand that it is extremely rare that any manufacturer of combat systems, who deals strictly with only military and law enforcement, would give the average civilian Joe ANY information whatsoever. With that said, and considering that more information might be needed in the future, please do not screw up this resource by flooding the manufacturer with calls/e-mails!!! If you guys require your own first-hand verification, then coordinate amongst yourselves and designate a SMALL (~5 to 10 people) group trusted to be credible to make the contacts. Spread out the communications over a period of a week or two and keep the communication as brief as possible. Otherwise, this information resource will be ruined for us and we might possibly cost the accommodating engineer a job! Also, if you do contact the manufacturer, please do not cite the allegations made in the YouTube video or any other information which the mainstream herd might consider "conspiracy". Perhaps you fly R/C airplanes and are looking for some durable, cost-effective, re-usable way to track and uniquely identify the planes in dog fight competitions. Perhaps you are part of a civilian survival instructional team and these devices would be perfect for field training, to identify who's doing what right/wrong. You get the idea. Don't just call and say, "Hey, your products are gonna be used to track us like cattle. How do you respond?" Please verify if you need to, but coordinate and be sensible about it in effort to not set off any red flags!
  
  
  
  Now, with that preface out of the way, the engineer was very forthcoming, as I said. We conversed for well over half an hour, covering a lot of technical and theory-of-use material (as well as some patriotic small talk). Here's what I took away from the conversation:
  
  
  
  • The devices are not very well suited for tracking and personally identifying large numbers of people. The engineer said that he/she could not envision any of their devices being feasibly used to personally identify more than 10 to 12 people, and even 5-6 people would be confusing and error-prone. The reason for this is outlined in the next bullet points below. The beacon devices are "really just suited to identify friend or foe but not which friend or foe, and this is the entire purpose of their [the devices'] design."

  
  

  • The devices emit a series of long and short pulses of light "just like Morse code" over a six-second window. The pattern of dots and dashes is programmable, thus could be used to personally identify very small groups of people (however much Morse-code you can fit into a six-second window, which is not much at all). Because of this Morse-code-like signaling, "...our devices are best suited for open fields and airspace." Suffice it to say that the device cited in the video, and all other products offered by the manufacturer, and even similar/knock-off devices I've found offered by other manufacturers, are NOT suited for mass tracking and identification as the poster fears. The technical reasons for this are cited below.

  
  

  • Because of the Morse-code-like operation of the device and its family, "If you're in urban areas or woods, you're walking past light poles, bushes, trees, sunflowers and things like that. If you wanted to use 'dash-dot-dash' as your personal ID and you walk past a fence post in the middle of one of your 'dash' pulses, the dash gets broken into two dots. Or, if you happen to move past a stick in the ground while transmitting your 'dot', the dot could be obscured to the viewer, making him see only two 'dashes'. Because of things like this, you would really need to observe the transmitter [and the person wearing it, by implication] for at least four or five cycles [24 to 30 seconds, total] but maybe even 9-10 cycles [54-60 seconds, total]. So, yeah, I guess you could improvise under the right conditions and use our units for personal ID, but that's not what we designed them to do and you would have to put up with a lot of inconsistencies." So using the device shown in the YouTube video for the purpose indicated by the poster - to track and identify masses of people in urban areas under normal/peaceful movement, not to mention movement in a state of chaos - would be impossible. I do not mean to imply that such devices capable of such purpose do not exist because I know they do exist, but the device shown in the video simply isn't one of them.

  
  

  • The devices offered by the manufacturer (and similar I/R devices I've found offered by other manufacturers) are basically transmitters without receivers. "The little pulses of light are interpreted by humans watching the lights just like Morse code is interpreted by someone sitting there listening and translating the dot-and-dash sounds into letters. Troops can discuss and agree ahead of time... you know... before they go out into the field... on what the dot-and-dash patterns mean. Dot-dot-dash can mean 'Hello, I'm with team-A' and dash-dot-dash can mean 'Hello, I'm with team-B'... you understand." At that point our conversation was taken into a scope of higher-level engineering and theory (which my background allows me to completely understand and engage). If there are any technical-minded people who want me to elaborate further on my next statement, I'll be glad to do so, but that will require a whole separate discussion (not in this thread). Suffice it to say that the challenges of creating a reliable, accurate, cost-effective receiver that can pick up blips of I/R light in field conditions and have the receiver tell you, "That's Davey Crockett... Oh, and there goes Peter Piper!" are extremely daunting and prohibitive from a standpoint of technical design. If for no other reason (but there are many more complicated reasons) a transmitter/receiver relationship based on light is a line-of-sight relationship. I asked the engineer about the citations in the product specifications which say that the beacon can easily be seen through several layers of clothing. The answer is that "...the light can shine through the gaps between the fibers of conventional clothing, but heavy materials such as wool and thick canvas are not penetrated. Regular light shines through the fiber gaps just like I/R does... it's just that I/R is easier to see with the right equipment. Infrared light has some oddities when it comes to what it will penetrate. It will brightly penetrate the leaves of trees and bushes, but not glass and Plexiglas." Keep that in mind for scenarios of viewing I/R light from aircraft or elevated positions. In general, I/R light will not penetrate most things that regular light will not penetrate. There are only a handful of exceptions where I/R light will penetrate what regular light will not, and vice-versa. The end result of all this theory on how I/R light works and line-of-sight requirements is that the device is a transmitter and the receiver is a human who must sit, watch and know how to interpret what is transmitted. There's no "scanner" of sorts that could be used to scan/track/identify the masses with I/R light based devices.

  
  

  • I/R light, which is what gets transmitted from the device in question, "...can only be seen with night vision, thermal imaging or with some very expensive microwave imaging tools and manual [human] interpretation of the flash patterns is still necessary."

  
  

  • The device in question does not transmit anything but I/R light. "There's no RF [radio frequency], microwave or anything like that and there's no receivers of any kind in our units." Additionally, "...we don't offer anything with any kind of GPS processing."

  
  

  
  
  

• Forced acceptance of the bracelets: I have attempted to find legislation, state laws and local ordinances related to this alleged forced marking of the masses. While I have found documentation indicating that there are plans to offer the bracelets, I have not yet found any kind of "enforcement" support. What I mean by that is that I haven't yet found anything touching on methods or reasonable justifications for forcing people to take the bracelets, or anything on penalties or consequences for refusal. While I still have more research to do, if any of you are aware of any such evidence, please let me know so I can weigh supporting and opposing facts. At this stage in the game, I believe that if there are any penalties for not accepting the bracelets it will be something along the lines of fines - not loading up "offenders" and hauling them off to concentration camps. I think the scenario will be something along the lines of, "Here, wear this bracelet any time you're out in public. If you're caught without it, city ordinance #X says you'll get a $X fine." Also, the video poster alleges that the devices will be "pinned to the wrist" or otherwise "attached permanently" to the wearer; however, battery life and service requirements of the device make it unlikely/unreliable as any kind of permanent/long-term ID.

Don't get me wrong. I DO believe that the bracelet program is a pilot program to test the waters of acceptance for future plans. As such, it should be treated as if they're trying to hold people down and force them to take RFID chips. I just wanted to clear up a few technical points about the Boston bracelet program.

from the CDC website. Look up your own states laws, but here is the form for Texas.

:( http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/quarantine.asp

http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/rls/lha/communicabledisease.shtm

VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE AND COULD RESULT IN CONFINEMENT FOR 180 DAYS, A FINE OF $2,000, OR BOTH. VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER COULD ALSO RESULT IN COURT ORDERED MANAGEMENT, WHICH MAY INCLUDE INVOLUNTARY INCARCERATION IN A TREATMENT FACILITY OR OTHER LOCATION AS DETERMINED BY THE COURT.

HEALTH AUTHORITY ORDER

TO: (name of individual, parent, legal guardian or
managing conservator)

FROM: (name of health authority)

DATE: (today’s date)

(Name of health authority) finds that (name of individual) is
within my jurisdiction and has reasonable cause to believe that (name
of individual) is ill with, has been exposed to, or is the carrier of a communicable disease, (name of disease: include scientific and
common names).

The (name of health authority) finds control measures are reasonable and necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission,
and spread of the disease in the State of Texas. By authority of Section 81.083 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, (name of health authority) ORDERS that (name of individual) immediately:

be subject to (any control measure that is reasonable and necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of the disease in this state, including but not limited to:)

(CHOOSE AND INCLUDE ONE OR ALL THAT APPLY FROM BELOW)

1. being immunized with (name of vaccine).

2. being detained until (name of individual):

[Choose (a) or (b)]
a. is no longer infected with (common name of disease).
b. the longest period of incubation for (common name of disease) or (number of days of longest incubation period of disease has expired).

3. being restricted to (area or place of restriction), i.e. his/her residence, institution, or current residential location at (complete physical address).

4. being disinfected for (common name of disease) by (name of disinfecting ingredient or process).

5. being decontaminated by (name of process).

6. being isolated to [exact area or physical address of place of isolation or name(s) of person(s) to be isolated from].

7. being quarantined by admission to (name of institution) at (complete physical address).

8. being disinfected by (name of process of disinfestations).

9. receiving chemoprophylaxis by (name of process or chemoprophylactic agent).

10. receiving preventive therapy by (name of therapy).

11. receiving prevention by (name of method of prevention).

12. receiving education by (name of disease and of the educational course and date, time and complete physical address if applicable).

Again, no offer of proof.... "have it on good authority"... "sources personally attest"...

Not that I put it past these bums but let's not get all sweaty about something we have no knowledge of.

End the FED instead.

I may not know the truth, but I know when I'm being lied to...

wrong.

Obama = O.ne B.ig A.ss M.istake A.merica

http://www.unhinderedliving.com/statevaccexemp.html