Home » Forums » Daily Paul Liberty Forum

According to wiki many US presidents had Czars Bush had more than Obama

Submitted by chonk123 on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:24
in
0 votes

Bush had even more than Obama. Interesting. Anyone care to do more reasearch?

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I heard he had fewer

Submitted by ShineTheLight on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 23:42.

but Bush-Obama, no difference.

Who cares?

Submitted by melgesman on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:58.

They were, and still are, all overseer's of unconstitutional statutes. Calling them Czar's is pretty "In Your Face" though...ain't it?

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

—

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

Yep!

Submitted by Katherine on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:37.

But in Bush's admin and previous admins they called them secretaries rather than czars. I didn't know that Bush had more than BO, tho!

—

-
"Stand up for what you believe in. Even if you stand alone."
~ Sophie Magdalena Scholl
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."
~ Ron Paul
"You must be the change you want to see in the world."
~ Mahatma Gandhi

Nope. They called them "czars". Nixon started it

Submitted by MikeLawson on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:54.

Nice to have you aboard though!

—

Explore Orthodox Christianity

Oh yeah...snicker...she's aboard...

Submitted by melgesman on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:55.

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

—

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece