According to wiki many US presidents had Czars Bush had more than Obama
Submitted by chonk123 on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:24Bush had even more than Obama. Interesting. Anyone care to do more reasearch?
»
Bush had even more than Obama. Interesting. Anyone care to do more reasearch?
|
★
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here

I heard he had fewer
but Bush-Obama, no difference.
Who cares?
They were, and still are, all overseer's of unconstitutional statutes. Calling them Czar's is pretty "In Your Face" though...ain't it?
"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece
"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece
Yep!
But in Bush's admin and previous admins they called them secretaries rather than czars. I didn't know that Bush had more than BO, tho!
-
"Stand up for what you believe in. Even if you stand alone."
~ Sophie Magdalena Scholl
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."
~ Ron Paul
"You must be the change you want to see in the world."
~ Mahatma Gandhi
Nope. They called them "czars". Nixon started it
Nice to have you aboard though!
Explore Orthodox Christianity
Oh yeah...snicker...she's aboard...
"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece
"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece