My Congressman John Spratt on HR1207
A Response from Rep. John Spratt regarding HR1207, 'Audit the Fed'
Thank you for contacting me to express support for HR 1207, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009.
If passed, HR 1207 would direct the Comptroller General "to complete, before the end of 2010, an audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and of the federal reserve banks" and follow with a detailed report to Congress.
The current financial crisis has heightened interest in the role of the Federal Reserve (Fed). Besides its traditional role of controlling the monetary supply, the Fed has taken unprecedented actions as a "lender of last resort" to the nation's financial system. First, the Fed has expanded its direct lending programs to non-member banks, purchased financial securities, and intervened to support certain financial instruments, like commercial paper. Second, the Fed has provided assistance to keep financial institutions from failing, particularly those considered "too big to fail." As Congress considers proposals to strengthen financial regulation, the debate has centered on whether the Fed's powers should be expanded or reduced. An accounting of the Fed's assets and liabilities would be helpful as this debate continues in Congress.
HR 1207 would vest the Comptroller General with major new powers. The Comptroller General heads the Government Accountability Office, which is considered an arm of the Congress; and while the GAO does a lot of audit work throughout the government, its expertise is not financial institutions or financial regulatory agencies. If the GAO is granted significant oversight jurisdiction of the Fed, the rest of the world, which looks to the Fed for independence and strict stewardship over the dollar, may conclude that the Fed is now beholden to Congress and cannot be trusted to control the monetary supply and avoid inflation. We have to be wary of sending such signals to the world's financial markets. We do not want to give anyone a reason to dump the dollar.
The Fed is already subject to audit, and I would readily vote to expand that audit, if needed. For example, I have no problem with expanding the audit to cover Open Market Committee transactions. The entire financial regulatory system is currently under study, and recommendations to increase the accountability of the Fed are likely to emerge from that study. The chairman of the Financial Services Committee has recently indicated that he will bring this or a similar bill to the floor for a vote, and I am waiting to see what form that bill will take. I doubt that HR 1207 will be considered separately from other regulatory proposals, but I understand your concerns about the Fed, and share them, and expect to vote for whatever bill eventually emerges from committee. My only concern is that I would prefer auditors other than the GAO for this purpose.
Thank you again for contacting me and please continue to stay in touch on issues of importance to you that come before Congress.
Respectfully,
John M. Spratt, Jr.
Member of Congress





















Now that I'm reading this letter again
Actually, this is a very well constructed piece of propaganda. There are many subtle forms of persuasion at play here. These letters are trial balloons to see what combination of BS will placate the people to go back to sleep. I'm going to analyze this further and post a detailed rebuttal.
A good point?
Does Spratt have a valid point with his comment, "I would prefer auditors other than the GAO for this purpose"? It seems like you would still have the fox guarding the henhouse, or maybe a coyote, but six of one and half a dozen of the other, right?
_________________________
Moobi
"In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." -- Thomas Jefferson
The comptroller general of
The comptroller general of the GAO is an appointed position (15 years) so that the top accountant can not be politically pressured regarding audits / assessments.
A separate auditor would likely not have the same protections...
...
If it doesn't matter to the outcome then why make a point of it?
The only "new power" which would be vested in the Comptroller General is the conclusive truth about what the fed has done with the money supply. There is no power to make policy vested in an auditor. Since HR1207 specifies the results of the audit be delivered to every member of Congress upon request, the Comptroller General wouldn't have any additional power because he/they couldn't act as the gatekeeper of the information. What Spratt is really saying is you can't trust Congress to do the right thing vis-a-vis money. While this may be true, it's Congress's constitutionally delegated responsibility to do just that. So Spratt is really saying that he himself is too irresponsible to carry out the authorities he's been entrusted with. He swore an oath to defend the Constitution and now he's asking for an exemption due to his own incompetence and corruptibility. Alternately, he believes holding his fellow congressmen (let alone himself) to a high standard of ethical conduct is a lost cause. We the people demand the Congress fulfill its oath. Spratt makes practical arguments against that.
translation
"If the GAO is granted significant oversight jurisdiction of the Fed, the rest of the world, which looks to the Fed for independence and strict stewardship over the dollar, may conclude that the Fed is now beholden to Congress and cannot be trusted to control the monetary supply and avoid inflation. We have to be wary of sending such signals to the world's financial markets. We do not want to give anyone a reason to dump the dollar."
Translation for the masses (I include my newly awakening sorry self in this group)
The only way to insure our standard of living is to make our open, free market process a secret.
A secret means we don't want certain people to know....shhh don't tell anybody. The jig, as they say, is about up.
Miamisburg, Montgomery County, Ohio
Excellent subtlety in his use of fear
Yeah, this guy is pretty slick. Notice how he attempts to use your fear of a dollar collapse to support his position of doing nothing to end the rip off. Also, he states although the "GAO does a lot of audit work throughout the government, its expertise is not financial institutions or financial regulatory agencies." Hmmm, the GAO audits the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) which is very clearly a "financial regulatory agency" so that's a lie. This guy thinks he's slick but it's fairly transparent from where I'm sitting.
thank you
I didnt even think about the SEC until you brought it up. I just called his office again and told them you cant blow smoke up my butt!
Freedom is NOT free!
You go!
Seriously, tell them you'd like a corrected letter. Hang in there for a better answer. The more these people get confronted with an implacable wall of truth the more negative Karma accumulates on their behalf.
Yes, a corrected letter is certainly due now
***
Freedom is not: doing everything you want to.
Freedom is: not having to do what you don't want to do.
~ Joyce Meyer
Freedom is not: doing everything you want to.
Freedom is: not having to do what you don't want to do.
~ Joyce Meyer
Just like a politician
to ride the fence.