Why do police have power?
There was a time, not too long ago, when Sheriff's and deputy's were the enforcers of law. These officers enforced common law, and went into action upon someone calling for them, or witnessing a crime. In fact, some of us can STILL remember the phrase "would you like to press charges?" If the answer was "no" all was done, because without an injured party there is no crime, if no one alleges personal injury, there is no injured party.
So what happened?
All cities, towns, states etc. are now "Companies", within the past 100 years they became incorporated, and as corporations (this can be found at www.DnB.com) created a corporate position known as police officer. We know that "officer" is a corporate word, such as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Administrative Officer, and so on. These new "police officers" are allowed to enforce rules over their administration only. For example, in Dublin, California, the Dublin police have jurisdiction over City Employees, State Employees, County Employees, and employees of any political subdivisions therein, such as Waste Disposal workers, Utility Company workers, and so on. The ONLY other way that a human can fall under their jurisdiction is through consent, in other words, they have to give up their right to be governed by common law, and instead request to be governed by statutory law. Statutory law can include things like; jaywalking, seat belt requirements, cell phone laws, and other "laws" where there is no injured party.
How Can Humans Consent?
Each "State" is different in terminology, but exactly the same in content. In California a human can consent in 3 ways.
1) By registering a vehicle. The ONLY humans REQUIRED to register are employees of the positions listed above.
http://law.onecle.com/california/vehicle/4155.html
CVC 4155:
"Registration under this code shall apply to any vehicle owned
by the United States government, the state, or any city, county, or
political subdivision of the state, except in the following
particulars"
This means, if a human, who is NOT employed in one of the positions mentioned, state employee, city employee, etc., registers a vehicle, then, they will be treated as an employee of one of those positions, and thus, under the jurisdiction of local police officers, and therefore giving their consent to be summoned.
http://law.onecle.com/california/vehicle/17459.html
CVC 17459:
"The acceptance by a resident of this state of a certificate
of ownership or a certificate of registration of any motor vehicle or
any renewal thereof, issued under the provisions of this code, shall
constitute the consent by the person that service of summons may be made upon him within or without this state, whether or not he is then a resident of this state, in any action brought in the courts of
this state upon a cause of action arising in this state out of the
ownership or operation of the vehicle."
The ONLY place in the code that says WHO it applies to is here:
http://law.onecle.com/california/vehicle/21052.html
CVC 21052
"The provisions of this code applicable to the drivers of
vehicles upon the highways apply to the drivers of all vehicles while
engaged in the course of employment by this State, any political
subdivision thereof, any municipal corporation, or any district,
including authorized emergency vehicles subject to those exemptions granted such authorized emergency vehicles in this code."
this code is a little confusing, because parts of the CVC do not deal with "drivers of vehicles upon the highway" so it clarifys in the beginning that the provisions that DO apply to drivers of vehicles, apply to all vehicles...
2) By having a "drivers license". The ONLY humans REQUIRED to be licensed are those engaged in commerce and those employed by the positions previously mentioned. Remember "used for commercial purposes" has specific meanings.
http://law.onecle.com/california/vehicle/17460.html
"The acceptance or retention by a resident of this state of a
driver's license issued pursuant to the provisions of this code,
shall constitute the consent of the person that service of summons
may be made upon him within or without this state, whether or not he is then a resident of this state, in any action brought in the courts
of this state upon a cause of action arising in this state out of
his operation of a motor vehicle anywhere within this state."
and
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00000031----...
"(10) Used for commercial purposes.— The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit."
the terms "directly or indirectly in connection with any business" STILL refers to the "carriage of 'persons' or 'property'", AND must be "INTENDED for profit."
This includes, but is not limited to:
Taxis, Buses, Limos, Ferry Service, Trains, Fishing Boats, Moving Trucks, 'for hire' semi trucks, ambulances, police cars, etc.
using your Private automobile to drive a friend to work is NOT commerce, although it is indirectly connected with any business, it is NOT intended for profit.
3) By signing away your rights. When one of these police officers offers you a citation, you do NOT have to sign it. In fact, if you do, you are consenting to their jurisdiction.
Think of it like this:
one day you are walking on the side walk in your shorts. You happen to be walking right next to the Ford Factory. All of a sudden, an administrative officer from Ford approaches you, and hands you a citation for "wearing shorts". He reminds you that Ford has a strict policy of 'NO SHORTS ALLOWED'. He wants you to sign the citation...you tell the officer that you dont work for Ford, he points out that you are wearing a 'Ford' hat...and recommends that you sign the ticket. You consent, and sign the ticket. You have just allowed this "officer" to have jurisdiction over you, now you will have to go to 'court' to fight it.
NOW, if you said "I AM NOT SIGNING THE TICKET" and walked away, there would be nothing he could do, except get you fired from Ford.
WITH POLICE, you can NOT do this, because POLICE do NOT understand their limits. They, by no fault of their own (some fault), believe that they have jurisdiction over anyone in their town. Instead, OF COURSE ASSUMING THAT YOU HAVENT ALREADY CONSENTED TO A SUMMONS BY HAVING A LICENSE OR REGISTRATION, you simply tell the officer that you do not wish to sign the ticket. He will probably say that he will arrest you if you dont. Then, I ask "under what statute or authority" they NEVER know the answer, and usually say something like "I just will", this is where you say "O.K., then sign "UNDER DURESS" and your name.
as soon as you get home you write "REFUSED FOR FRAUD, SIGNED UNDER DURESS" across the ticket and mail it to the police station and to the court that would handle it. BE SURE to do this within 72 hours, and be sure to make a copy for your records. I would also get it certified mail.
or you can sign it and pay the corporation, they will then literally deposit that amount into their bank and create a bond out of it.
there is a way to look this up, but they RECENTLY changed the requirements.
http://activequote.fidelity.com/mmnet/SymLookup.phtml?QUOTE_...
you can enter the last two digits of your birth year, such as 67 followed by the "red" numbers on the back of your Social Security card, or birth certificate to see other "bonds" made on your behalf.
But DONT forget:
On this page you will see two drop down menus. Select "Mutual Fund" in the first drop down box and "Fund Number" in the second.
To continue you will need to locate the number in red on the back of your SS card. You will also need to locate a red number on your birth certificate. (Older BCs and older SS cards have numbers like these but are more difficult to locate.)
You will need to enter the last two digits of your birth year first followed by the red number (and letters in some cases) as this will match the mutual fund your straw man is currently in. If you were born in 1976 it will look like this: 76xxxxxxxxx.
After searching it will give you a fund of some type like this one:
FIDELITY PRIME FUND CAPITAL RESERVE CLASS FPRXX 650914203 76





















I have found, what so far,
I have found, what so far, seems to be a fail proof method for tickets.
It relys on YOU making the signature "Under Duress" by telling the officer that you dont want to sign it. He will tell you that you have to or he'll arrest you, then it is under duress, and NOT enforceable. Sign the ticket "UNDER DURESS, YOUR NAME".
NO CONTRACT may be signed under duress. WITHIN 72 hours you need to send a copy of the ticket to the police station and the court with "REFUSED FOR FRAUD, SIGNED UNDER DURESS" written across it in big letters. circle the signature on the ticket that says "under duress"" next to it.
then they will send, within 10 days, a courtesy notice for a court trial.
write "refused for fraud" across this too, and send it back with a letter stating that you were forced to sign the ticket under threat of arrest.
Question?
Julius, if one is a private contractor using ones own vehicle to transport construction materials, is that travel use considered for profit or might that, for profit refer to those title 26 definitions of profits from a "trade or business".
Thanks for your posts. The learning and applying of the law is our only peaceful redress of bondage.
Great question. the answer
Great question.
the answer is NO.
As a private contractor you are not "using the roads for profit", you are using the roads to transport your property. Your profit is coming from your labor. Otherwise if someone down the road hired you to install a mailbox, you wouldnt be able to walk down the road, with a shovel to dig a hole, without having a license. Furthermore, the courts have held that legislation shall be narrowly construed, and in favor of the citizen:
"Where activities or enjoyment, natural and often necessary to the well being of an American citizen, such as travel, are involved, we will construe narrowly all delegated powers that curtail or dilute them... to repeat, we deal here with a constitutional right of the citizen..." Edwards v. California 314 US 160 (1941).
NOW, if your construction company became a corporation, THEN you are engaged in "Privileged activity", in the sense that you have little personal responsibility because you are not solely responsible as a corporation, THEN the State can require you to follow their rules, such as license requirements.
Ordinary course of business.
"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. - Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago, 169 NE 22 ("Regulated" here means stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission or unconstitutional taxation; i.e. - licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc., requiring financial consideration, which are more illegal taxes.)
and
"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."- Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579.
LASTLY, important
"TRADE OR BUSINESS" has a VERY specific definition.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sec_26_00007701----...
USC TITLE 26
(26) Trade or business
The term “trade or business” includes the performance of the functions of a public office.
A corporation IS a public office,
MUST READ!!!
http://www.sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/TradeOrBusScam.pdf
pittsburgh
"All cities, towns, states etc. are now "Companies", within the past 100 years they became incorporated, and as corporations (this can be found at www.DnB.com)"
I've heard this before and have looked up many cities/towns/counties/states in the 2-volume set at the library and have yet to find one.
Since Pittsburgh is in the news, I looked up the city name at the dnb.com and can't find it. Will you please help me find it?
http://FlipFlopRomney.blogspot.com
I typed in city of
I typed in city of Pittsburgh and got this:
https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/ePlatform/servlet/IballValidat...
You can also go to http://www.selectory.com sign up for the free 7 day trial. Look up your state and all it agencies police departments etc. etc.
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
next question
Now it is also working for me. Thanks.
Next question:
Since a city has employees, the city would need an Employer Identification Number for payroll tax withholding. Is this the reason a city shows up as a "business" - simply because it has filed for an EIN for tax purposes?
Is this why the Red Cross (a non-profit) also appears under the business search?
https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/ePlatform/servlet/IballValidat...
http://FlipFlopRomney.blogspot.com
first of all, dont fall for
first of all, dont fall for "red cross" as being "non profit in anything other than name.
The reasons these cities did this, was so they could "legally" turn a profit. This allowed them to invest money in mutual funds and stock markets. In fact, this is what happened in 2008. Say a city brought in 2 billion dollars in actual revenue, then invested it in the market, then the market crashed leaving the city with 1.1 billion dollars....this happened in hundreds of towns across the country. In prior years, the cities would invest the actual "take" and profit like crazy, and therefor spend like crazy.
Red Cross was just an
Red Cross was just an example, I know they are in business so the senior people can get big paychecks. (Salvation Army does good work.)
So a city gambled with their money, lived larger than life, and must now downsize. That shows they mismanaged the money.
What about the EIN being the explanation for the cities appearing in dnb.com? You are convinced it is more than simply the means to have a EIN to withhold payroll taxes?
Also, I've wondered how some small community colleges get police power. Some have cop cars, radar, and write tickets. I have seen them write speeding tickets on the public roads outside the school. I got a parking ticket at a community college some years ago. I didn't pay it and they send me a letter every few years wherever the car is registered. Therefore, it appears they can tap in to state DMV databases.
How do they get the police power? If they are real police, why haven't they done anything about the ticket?
http://FlipFlopRomney.blogspot.com
Red Cross does good work
Red Cross does good work too, but they are still a corporation. And as a corporation, they have a legal requirement to try to make a profit....the EIN explanation doesnt work because you dont need to be a "corporation" to get an EIN...furthermore a "city" is only suppose to pay out, what it brings in, and it is NOT suppose to be a "federal Zone" and therefore is NOT subject to Federal Tax. Instead, however, they are a "corporation" under the "federal government" corporation, and therefore subject to Federal Jurisdiction.
think of it like this.
The Federal Government is "General Motors" a principal corporation
Michigan is "pontiac" a "political subdivision" of said corporation
Nebraska is "Saturn"
California is "Oldsmobile"
Florida is "Cadillac"
Georgia is "buick"
and so on...the "rules" that apply to GM, also apply to all of the political subdivisions.
this is why there is a difference between "State" and "state"
http://sedm.org/SampleLetters/DefinitionsAndConventions.htm
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/State.htm
famguardian.org I need to
famguardian.org
I need to study that site.
http://FlipFlopRomney.blogspot.com
If you go to selectory and
If you go to selectory and do the 7 day trial they are all listed as "Private" corporations. There as supreme court rulings that when government descends to a corporation it ceases to be government. There is no such jurisdiction in the constitution as Statutory. Only Common Law and Admiralty. Statutes are just corporate policy of private corporations and do not apply to free Americans under the constitution, it is a foriegn jurisdiction operating in fraud on the american people.
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
Good Post Julius. I wish
Good Post Julius. I wish more people would learn who they are we could stop this tyranny peacefully.
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
exactly, imagine if EVERY
exactly, imagine if EVERY human questioned every police officer, and fought every ticket....Imagine an America where there are licenses only for corporate privileged activity, a return to a common law understanding.
Imagine Thomas Jefferson getting stopped today by the police for "not wearing his seatbelt"
these are the things that consume me.
me too Julius. me too.
*
Long reading...........getting there
Bump, I always find your posts fascinating, and I'm still trying to digest all the info.........I really want to liberate myself from the chains of government nonsense.
PS Is that your real name? It sounds like dickens character, or maybe HG Wells.
Colchester, New London County, Connecticut
haaa...thats great. "dickens
haaa...thats great. "dickens character" haa
Spam filter tweaking, I think
I saw a few spam posts coming through last night and today.
I'm guessing that might be what's up.
"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k
since when do posts go
since when do posts go through moderator review process?