Hannity just debated two anti-capitalist women students

Sean
Hannity
Is a
Tool.

He sure likes that GM bailout money.

It is easy for some to proclaim to spread the wealth when it has been a stock pile of Capitalism that has created the Wealth to spread ..Once the wealth is spread there will be no more wealth to go around, which is exampled in the American economy today ..Social programs have raped the working class, into low class...Contrary to any belief, the Rich NEVER pay taxes ..This is why they are rich, they get to pass their tax on to society somehow..They may pay in to the system but they recieve back from somewhere else to make it up...It's called CIRCULATION..All growth comes out of CIRCULATION and all expenses to an economy come out of CIRCULATION.. Profit comes out of Circulation.. Why are there no jobs ? There are no businesses to create CIRCULATION..Circulation could also be called DISTRIBUTION, the word Liberals all fuss about...A capitalist society is the best form of DISTRIBUTION society can create because it rewards EFFORT..If you work you get DISTRIBUTION..Your portion of distribution is the result of someone's benefit...Without EFFORT, or call it labor, there can be NO wealth creation..A stone will never get placed on top of another unless someone places it there...That is profit..Without profit there is NO benefit, to yourself or anyone else..The problems arise when profit no longer contributes to benefit...Greed takes over for a time..Greed can only last so long until we end up with Circulation being comprimised..This is now the position of the FED...Then as you well know, we ALL suffer ..The Fed Reserve is about to learn the lesson of, "Greed unchecked" ..You are already witnessing the effects of non circulation created by to much too soon outsourceing..They must have heathcare premiums to keep the little bit of CIRCULATION going..Failed non profit policies have caught up to them..
When left to function as intended, Capitalism WORKS.
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen

Mentally challenged socialists vs. mentally challenged authoritarian. They actually weren't very far off in their viewpoints when you view it from the big picture. After all the students want to force others to pay for special programs for the poor and Hannity wants to force everyone to pay for special programs to bomb the Middle East and beef up homeland security which impedes those freedoms he so vociferously defended in this segment.

But the real agenda of this segment was to send the message that those who would speak out against the G-20 and other gov't and banking forums are extremists and wackos. I have no idea if these ladies were actually representative of the viewpoints of those people engaging in protests or even destructive demonstrations. In fact the ladies claimed they were involved in a peaceful protest on an entirely different day than the G20. I think their discourse was interesting and misguided on both sides, but again I think there was a subversive message behind this whole segment.

Tough debate Hannity

and his lap dog Frank Lutz.

***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
$$$$$$$$$AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE$$$$$$$$$$

One of the women actually burns Hannity one point on the fact that he supports the socialism of fire response (ie. what the government runs today as "Fire Departments"). Lol, that is awesome. I hope he experiences some cognitive dissonance on that.