Obama or Iran: Who do you believe?
Obama: Iran Is on Notice, Won’t Rule Out Military Action
Is Second Facility Really 'Provocative' or a Hedge Against Attack?
by Jason Ditz
Citing Iran’s revelation earlier this week that it is constructing a second, smaller uranium enrichment facility, President Barack Obama demanded that the Iranian government “come clean” about his long-standing accusations of a nuclear weapons program, and said he would not rule out attacking the nation if they refused.
Obama said the second facility, reportedly an underground plant outside of Qom, was “inconsistent with a peaceful program” and claimed that the nation was “breaking rules that all nations must follow.”
Despite these claims, it isn’t apparent that Iran broke any rules with the facility. The IAEA only requires that it be informed six months before the facility is operational, which Iran apparently did on Monday. The IAEA has said the information it has been given suggests the facility, like Iran’s current one, is only designed to enrich uranium to 5%, useful only for civlian purposes.
The revelation is particularly irksome for the US, which was intending a “dramatic” unveiling of its existence today only to learn the IAEA had been told about it days ago. Despite haven’t been beaten to the punch, officials and media outlets still touted it as the uncovering of a “secret” site.
Continue reading: http://news.antiwar.com/2009/09/25/obama-iran-is-on-notice-w...
Continually harassing these
Continually harassing these other countries probably puts us at even greater risk. We ought to just bring our military home and spend the trillion or so that we save to develop a missile defense shield that includes both land, sea, air and space based defenses.
An added bonus would be that all those defenses would be able to shoot down planes just as easily, or easier, than they could shoot down missiles.
...
just stop this this and...
go here for a coffee break...
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/108679
I believe both
And the truth is in between
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
Neither...but...
...the one that has the most oil is in a better position to dictate terms.
Neither. They both use violence to lord over others.
Why would you trust either of them?
Sorry to say that I believe Iran over our current puppet...
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
At this point . . .
I listened to Amadinejad's speech. He's as charasmatic a speaker as Obama. It was well thought out, made a lot of good points, and clearly pointed out the hypocrisy of the US's foreign policies.
So at this moment in time, I'd say Ahmadinejad made a much better impression on me than Obama. But, I can't say that I "believe" either one of them.
Blessings )o(
Blessings )o(
Yes, they are both players in "the game"
but Ahmedinejad rings truer at this point. O just looks petulant, all those lost dollars don't cha know.
_____________________________
*What you don't know CAN hurt you.*
_____________________________
Defend Liberty, for Liberty
Vote for President Ron Paul 2012
http://ksa4liberty.com
i agree.
somewhere in the middle we will find the truth.
i do find it disheartening that americans will sacrifice their sons and daughters without any real discussion.
what is the un good for if real debate is neither allowed or reported?
"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul