MSM: "OKC Bombing Tapes Appear Edited"
I was surprised to see this coming from the Associated Press!
"Attorney: OKC bombing tapes appear edited
OKLAHOMA CITY — Long-secret security tapes showing the chaos immediately after the 1995 bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building are blank in the minutes before the blast and appear to have been edited, an attorney who obtained the recordings said Sunday.
"The real story is what's missing," said Jesse Trentadue, a Salt Lake City attorney who obtained the recordings through the federal Freedom of Information Act as part of an unofficial inquiry he is conducting into the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.
Trentadue gave copies of the tapes to The Oklahoman newspaper, which posted them online and provided copies to The Associated Press.
The tapes turned over by the FBI came from security cameras various companies had mounted outside office buildings near the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. They are blank at points before 9:02 a.m., when a truck bomb carrying a 4,000 pound fertilizer-and-fuel-oil bomb detonated in front of the building, Trentadue said.
"Four cameras in four different locations going blank at basically the same time on the morning of April 19, 1995. There ain't no such thing as a coincidence," Trentadue said.
He said government officials claim the security cameras did not record the minutes before the bombing because "they had run out of tape" or "the tape was being replaced."
"The interesting thing is they spring back on after 9:02," he said. "The absence of footage from these crucial time intervals is evidence that there is something there that the FBI doesn't want anybody to see."
A spokesman for the FBI in Oklahoma City, Gary Johnson, declined to comment and referred inquiries about the tapes to FBI officials in Washington, who were not immediately available for comment Sunday.
The soundless recordings show people rushing from nearby buildings after the bomb went off. Some show people fleeing through corridors cluttered with debris. None show the actual explosion that ripped through the federal building.
FBI agents did not report finding any security tapes from the federal building itself.
The FBI in the past refused to release the security camera recordings, leading Trentadue and others to contend the government was hiding evidence that others were involved in the attack.
"It's taken a lawsuit and years to get the tapes," Trentadue said.
He received the latest batch of tapes over the summer in response to an April request for video from security cameras in 11 different locations. Nothing on the tapes was unexpected.
"The more important thing they show is what they don't show," Trentadue said. "These cameras would have shown the various roads and approaches to the Murrah Building."
More at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2x42nrWBo...
What are they hiding this time???





















Jesse Trentadue on alex jones show plus a bunch of links
Jesse Trentadue on alex jones show plus a bunch of links
http://adap2k.blogspot.com/2008/12/jesse-trentadue-kenny-okl...
Chat room
http://12160.chatango.com/
"Ron Paul For President 2012" on 12160
http://12160.info/group/ronpaulforpresident2012
.
http://twitter.com/12160mhz
.
Seems to be the...
Modus operandi...
A plausible explanation
The one videotape that has been shown is pointed at the back door of the public library about a block away from the Murrah Bldg. It didn't show any part of the Murrah Bldg and it's not clear what it could have shown for the missing ten or twenty seconds.
Far more likely than any "editing" is that the explosion itself caused a momentary disruption in the power lines, and stuff like computers, security cameras, and other equipment needed a few moments to reset.
Not a bad explanation, but
Not a bad explanation, but if this were the case, why wouldn't the government come out and say so? Quoting from the article:
He said government officials claim the security cameras did not record the minutes before the bombing because "they had run out of tape" or "the tape was being replaced."
"Tapes did not record because of power outage" is a hell of a lot more plausible and less suspicious than four different cameras "running out of tape" at the same time! What reason do they have to cover up a power outage?
What the govt said....
This story that "the govt said" that all the cameras were being reloaded or whatever comes from the one guy, Trentadue (sp?), who has an axe to grind. I'd rather hear an explanation from the govt itself than have it filtered through Trentadue.
It is worth nothing that the explosion happened at 9:02, just as some businesses and offices are opening, and that might in fact be a reasonable time for new cassettes to be loaded into security cameras -- but too coincidental for four different systems at the same moment.
Blink or no blink, with or without a good explanation, this Trentadue will not (and, at least in the case of the library cameras, cannot) tell us what those cameras, which did not show the Murrah Bldg to begin with, might have shown in the missing ten seconds or so.
Sounds more like you have an axe to grind my friend...
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
As I said in the other thread about this story
This is just like the Pentagon attack on 9/11, where the FBI confiscated and sequestered all of the video tapes in the area within hours of the attack.
We now know that they did this to cover up the fact that the plane (yes, there WAS a large plane that was seen by all of the witnesses headed toward the Pentagon) did NOT hit the building, but rather flew over while the damage was done with preplanted explosives.
This fact is proven by corroborated eyewitness testimony gathred by two researchers from California called Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) who went to Arlington VA and video recorded interviews with key witnesses with the best vantage points of the final seconds of the plane in flight before the alleged impact.
The witnesses reveal that the plane flew on the north side of the Citgo gas station across the street from the Pentagon, whereas it HAD to be on the south side to hit the light poles that were down and cause the directional damage to the building itself, which is compatible ONLY with a south side.
It was also seen flying away by multiple eyewitness such as Roosevelt Roberts Jr.
For years the FBI refused to release the video tapes from the Citgo station. Then, in 2006, they released a manipulated version of the Citgo tape just days after CIT announced their interview with Robert Turcios, a station employee and eyewitness who told CIT that he is "100 percent sure" that the plane was on the north side of the station.
The former Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission was recently asked about the Citgo tapes and dodged the question.
i can ask him, and to just
i can ask him, and to just say screw him....how ridiculous, do you have any idea what people go through who dig into these things, usually they are ran sacked, rapped and pillaged, when you have gone through that yourself, then come talk tough, or "screw you".
He was all over tv before and people didnt want to hear it.
lol im just saying
once you 'let it out' you no longer have a secret to be silenced over. The safest thing he could do is let the cat out of the bag. If he wants to hold on to the damning evidence for personal gain, then he's obstructing justice and withholding information and being a jerk. No offense, but personally Im tired of people "talking" and never "producing". Like I said- if he's got something- lets see it so we can support him. Does he plan to release it? Is there a reason we arent seeing it yet? Is there a link to his website?
If this is believable (to the sheople) then 9/11 isn't going to
be so far fetched..
Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Very good point
May be just the catalyst the investigation movement needs.
a friend sent me this. I
a friend sent me this.
I have been working on this along with people like Jesse Trentadue from the beginning . . .
this report is wrong only in two ways . . . there were 22 video tapes not 4 . . .
there were three explosions, not two, and not one . . .
there were two "seismic readings" from two reporting stations . . .
I have them both . . . one shows two, and other shows three, why because
when the first explosion went off, the power supply at one station was shorted out,
so there was no recording of the first, but then the generator kicked in
and the next two where recorded . . . oh yes I have all the proof . . .
who says they don't alter the video tapes . . . one lie after another . . .
it has been 14 years . . . the 22 video tapes were locked away by the U.S. Fed Court
the reason I know the tapes are a lie, is because I heard the audio tape recordings
and I have the complete photographs of the area . . . the evidence shows a huge
explosion from the outside of the building, and a huge explosion from the inside . . .
I have said above only 1 hundredth of the story . . ."
Yeah. And Dan Ackroyyd has pics of the Chicago Ohare UFO
"and I have the complete photographs of the area . . . the evidence shows a huge
explosion from the outside of the building, and a huge explosion from the inside . . ."
Please ask your friend to publish what he has so they can be seen. If he's holding out to make a few bucks on a documentary - screw him.
I was just about to post
I was just about to post this. This is from an attorney in my home town.
Great find! Thanks for posting
If any CTs are in need of a good hunt, look into the connection of the Aryan Republican Army and Tim McVeigh. I have my own theory of how the government could have pulled it off. It's probably not what you would think. No AJ version for me. I always wondered about those tapes. They showed footage of the truck pulling up but never showed Tim McVeigh getting out. I would love to learn the REAL truth on what happened.
"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle." Sun Tzu -The Art of War
They mention Kenneth Trentadue was a convicted
bank robber. Like it's ok to murder someone if they've robbed a bank. Maybe it's better to eliminate those who lie in nationally syndicated media publications (that would make for a better world) Apparently he had enough credibility as a material witness or looked like one (looked like Richard Lee Guthrie who was going to spill the beans on OKC to an LA reporter) to murder to keep him quiet.
Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow
It just shows the audacity of those in charge...
It's like they don't even care what you think about the possibility of an anomaly on four separate cameras.
I don't believe any official story is even near the truth.
I may not know the truth, but I know when I'm being lied to...
I may not know the truth, but I know when I'm being lied to...
It's good that that's going mainstream
Has anyone here ever read news reporter Jayna Davis's book, The Third Terrorist? It's about the OKC bombing and cover-up.
"something there that the FBI doesn't want anybody to see"
Funny, that will make folks like you and me want to see it really badly, and yet it will make the typical American think "Well, I am safer if I don't see it."
Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.
crack of dawn bump
crack of dawn bump
"and the truth shall make you free"
John 8:32
A-hem!
[cough]
Puttin' on the foil, coach!