0 votes

Don’t like Government Health Care? You’ve Already Got It!

A funny thing happened on the way to the Government takeover of health care. I realized that it had already happened.

No, I don’t mean Government as in Of-the-People, By-the-People, Founding-Fathers-set-This-up Government. I mean the real Government that controls health care: the Aetna-Blue Cross-Humana-Corporate-government. They set the price, tell me what treatment I can and can’t get, and, every three or four months, raise the price whether I like it or not. Personally, after years of being subject to this Corporate Government, I don’t see what I have to fear from my elected one.

As a 50 year old novelist and business owner with a wife and two children, all of us in excellent physical condition, I am currently paying more than $13,000 each year for our family’s Blue Cross health insurance. That “tax” is greater than the contribution I make to Social Security. It has increased about $5800 since I signed up less than two years ago. Since there is a $1000 deductible per person and co-payments, we easily pay another $1,000-3,000 per year in routine medical and pharmacy bills, as well as $2-3000/year in dental. We won’t even talk about optical and orthodontics, which are not covered at all. So, in a year when we are all healthy, I pay about $17,000 in medical and dental expenses. Most of this goes into the pocket of the health insurance corporation.

The corporate overlords of my health care, the ones who tell the doctors how much to charge and what they’ll cover, have set up a bureaucracy that would rival that of most South American Republics. Between the insurance companies and the extra staff needed by hospitals and doctors to jump through their hoops, 31% of current US medical dollars are spent on administration and overhead, not medical care. Contrary to the lies being spread these days, Government-of-the-People programs such as Medicaid and Medicare have far lower overhead than Corporate Government plans, since they have no fat executive salaries or shareholder dividends to pay, nor a huge apparatus dedicated to assessing and denying patients’ claims. What do I have to fear from a public health plan? That they might charge me less or, heavens, that I might pay the same amount, and actually get coverage?
Some might say the Corporate Government is more American, because I have the freedom to not buy it. Freedom to go bankrupt if my child gets sick in this bloated, parasitic health care system. Freedom, once I’m bankrupt, to go to the emergency room and foist the costs off on everyone else. Freedom, if I ever get out of bankruptcy again, to pay whatever skyrocketing price my insurance company might happen to be charging five years down the road. That’s the Corporate Government’s idea of freedom.
In this modern age, where power abhors a vacuum, you’re always going to have one Government or the other. As your doctor might say, choose your poison.

Novelist Stuart Archer Cohen [stuart@stuartarchercohen.com] is the author of The Army of the Republic (Picador), a novel about an American insurgency. His previous novels have been translated into 10 languages. Visit his website: www.StuartArcherCohen.com




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

YEA , well this all may be

YEA , well this all may be true , but I have already paid in for all my working years & there is no more funds at this point to provide the sevices I have ALREADY paid for..They want me to pay again & trust them with a NEW program that is a sure failure... Just as the past programs have been robbed so will the new program be bankrupted ..They are despirate for bailout monies ..They have made promises they cannot keep without a NEW scam.. Sorry, I do not want to deal with scam artists, who are really after my money, not really wanting to administer my health benefits.
Good gov't listens to it's people,
Good gov't does not enslave, it's citizens & bind them to insolvent programs...Derivitive lifestyles end in insolvency..
Someone else always gets the bill..$$$$$DEBT

sacohen: So is Dr Paul full of BS?

Healthcare Reform is More Corporate Welfare by Dr. Ron Paul

"Last Wednesday the nation was riveted to the President’s speech on healthcare reform before Congress. While the President’s concern for the uninsured is no doubt sincere, his plan amounts to a magnanimous gift to the health insurance industry, despite any implications to the contrary.

For decades the insurance industry has been lobbying for mandated coverage for everyone. Imagine if the cell phone industry or the cable TV industry received such a gift from government? If government were to fine individuals simply for not buying a corporation’s product, it would be an incredible and completely unfair boon to that industry, at the expense of freedom and the free market. Yet this is what the current healthcare reform plans intend to do for the very powerful health insurance industry."

read the rest here: http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,...

On healthcare.

We have a mess because a lot of people are very dependent on health care. But we’re going broke, with billions going to debt every single year, and we have a foreign policy that is draining us.

I say, take care of these poor people. I’m not against that. But save the money someplace. The only place available for us to save it is to change our attitude about running a world empire and bankrupting this country.

We can take care of the poor people, save money and actually cut some of our deficit.

"Truth is treason in the Empire of Lies."

"Truth is treason in the Empire of Lies."

sacohen's picture

Consider the Source

The Army of the Republic
If it comes from the Heritage Foundation, you can be pretty sure it's taken out of context to prove whatever point they wanted to make in the first place.

Were the denied claims fraudulent? Why does the AMA endorse a public option if they have such a gripe about Medicare? Are they too stupid to read their own figures? I don't think so.

Facts only have meaning in context, and Heritage Foundation doesn't care about context.

Medicare: The Largest Denier of Health Care Claims

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/368/reportcard.pdf

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/06/medicare-largest-denier-...

"According to AMA’s National Health Insurance Report Card, Medicare denies 6.85 percent of its claims, higher than any private insurer (Aetna was second, denying 6.80 percent of its claims), and more than double any private insurer’s average."

Michael Nystrom's picture

Nixon and the HMO Business Model

'Always be yourself. Everyone else is taken.' - Oscar Wilde

jay26783 Brothers Death

Sojourner6
Sorry for the loss of your brother. Organ donation, although it helps the unfortunate extentd their lives a bit longer, is a gold mine to the medical profession. Organ donors nor thier heirs do not share in the wind fall for doctors and hospitals for thier selfless act. They are expected to donate and would be deemed mercinary if they spoke up. The medical industry needs to be formed by reining in, an example is; an overnight stay in a semi private costing thousands of dollars, and crating a pile of cash or insurance for them to draw from only adds to the problem of gouging the victim which is nicely put as "high costs" which they tell us is due to high insurance costs.. The government knows what is going on and wants their piece of the action. So now we have the " Health Care Reform Bill" to lower cost, right? Why would one donate their organs to perpetuate the continued practice of gouging the public unless it is family. If we donate the organs how about the doctors and hospitals donating too, or at least compensating the donors. Stop cooperating with a corrupt system.

Sojourner6

"Why would one donate their

"Why would one donate their organs to perpetuate the continued practice of gouging the public unless it is family."

One wouldn't do it to perpetuate public gouging; one would do it because of the blessing it provides another family. There is more to life than finances. We all get it; the system is broken, and costs are high. Do you think withholding an organ when you're dead is going to change that? Absolutely not, not even on a large scale. It's ridiculous. I'm all for changing the system, but not by hoarding life-saving organs as a means of protest; that's just naive, selfish, and contrary to the spirit of goodwill.

Everyone knows we need to change the broken system politically, like any other messed up laws. Not by dragging your still-functional organs into the grave with you when you die.

What you fail to understand, is that...

it's not your choice whether someone should be selfless or selfish in regards to donating one's organs. You have no right to demand or impose your "good[will]" onto others who do not wish to be of the same opinion you have. People have the right to choose what blessings they will provide to family, friends, or strangers, be it whatever method they choose.You can suggest to people that donating one's organs is a great cause, but you cannot demand it because you think it is, or because you think it's right, but rather because their conscience tells them it's right.

Wow. This board is just full

Wow. This board is just full of stupid people who make stuff up in their mind and decide that someone else said it.

Where the hell did you get that I am "demanding" anything? All I have done was address some of the FALLACIES that people have stated as THEIR REASON for NOT DONATING. I did not demand anything but a better understanding of the issue before someone makes a decision based on exagerrated, baseless fears.

God some of these people in here are absolutely freakin' retarded.

sacohen's picture

I don't think the free market is the solution here

I think the nature of health care militates against a free market solution to this problem. It's almost impossible for the consumer to make an informed buying decision without becoming a doctor himself. It's different from buying most consumer items.

For example, let's say I discover that I'm passing blood in my urine. My doctor recommends various tests. Do I second guess him and say, no, that's too expensive? There's only one hospital where I live: how do I shop around for cheaper tests? And how do I know if all the tests are equal? Maybe one doesn't test for a certain element to save money, but I don't know how important that is, because I'm not a doctor. I have to rely on my doctor for expertise, and the stakes are a lot higher than, say, buying a new car. Realistically, are you going to shop around for a heart surgeon based on price, or are you going to go with the best reputation, or your cardiologist's recommendation.

But still, I think a huge part of the problem is just having the insurance companies get in the middle of every dollar spent on health care. They do nothing, they add no value: they're parasites. They've inserted themselves deeper and deeper into the process, exerting more and more control over it and contributing to the spiraling of health care costs.

Additionally, Medicare currently acts as a massive subsidy to insurance companies by taking the oldest, neediest patients off their roles. Can you imagine what insurance would cost if everybody's 70 year old parents had to buy insurance? How many could afford it? What kind of care would elders get. So, as much as the insurance co.s claim they don't want elected government involved in health care, they're glad to have all those old folks off their hands, and be able to prey on younger, healthier people.
If Americans had to face the spectacle of a bunch of uninsured old people dying because they couldn't afford their medical bills they'd probably come up with, well, Medicare.

It's a multifaceted problem and I don't think kicking back and waiting for monopolistic competition between insurance companies to save us is our best bet.

again, in a free market,

again, in a free market, health insurance companies would probably not exist. if you've ever been to the eastern world, where real free markets exist, you would know what i mean by that. saying the individual consumer will not make informed decisions for himself is the same kind of rhetoric the extreme statists use to impose fascism on us in every area of the market.

look at natural, homeopathic and ayurveda medicine. or acupuncture, cosmetic surgery etc. the prices are extremely cheap, because so far, government has left it's hand out of it. look at india, where the competition keeps prices extremely cheap. ashrams, hospitals, private doctors and nurses provide services. chemists compete with the pharmacies. there are no prescription mandates. you can walk directly up to the pharmacy and order your synthetic or natural medicine for less than 3 bucks most of the time. i was given treatment there for typhoid for 40 dollars, including several medications, a checkup, i.v. bags and a nurse to stay the night in my own home(the doctor was also on call) changing the bags and taking care of me, including a check up in the morning.

consumers may not know what their getting themselves into in a fascist bureaucracy like this one, but when consumers are not brainwashed by the system, believing the government created, managed and subsidized insurance industry is the free market working to provide you an individual bailout for patented drugs that will help kill you over time, then things do work out. the free market is undoubtedly the answer.

Thank you Sacohen for

Thank you Sacohen for excellent post. Too many DP's see free market as magic wand that solves every problem.

For god sake... why free market can't solve our national security needs???

Those who want feel secure could buy security insurance. Military, police and all other security agencies would be paid by private corporation security insurance... not by taxpayers.

I would gladly accept if the greed of those corporations would not cover wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Those that can't afford or do not want to buy security insurance can defend their house, community and country yourself.. I bet that such approach would reduce cost of shotguns and maybe even patriot missiles will become more affordable.

Governments actually limit

Governments actually limit the number of hospitals you can have in an area - that's why there's only one in some places. In New York they actually closed some hospitals down.

A hospital or doctors track record based on word of mouth also could help determine where you would like to go in a free market. Where I live we have two hospitals, each with different track records which are publicly available. Plus if you have a friend or family member who likes a doctor, most likely you would try them out yourself.

So free markets do have their role. Why do you think lasik is so much cheaper now? Word of mouth, track records and competition.

Insurance does stink that's for sure. They also raise premiums for lobbying effords in Washington, but they aren't obligated to tell you that. But we could rely less on them and have insurance companies compete if they were allowed to. But for now the states won't allow that competition across state lines which is also part of the problem.

What we really need to do is fix it from both the government end and the insurance side. They both have issues which is why it's so expensive.

--------------------------------------------------
Get your free Ron Paul Educational DVD Bomb files!
http://www.content.animateclay.com/ronpaul/ronpauldvdbomb.html

Qliance

Qliance in Seattle which provides primary care has a system that works great. It works great because it provides patients with unlimited care and doesn't deny them because of any pre-existing conditions. Doctors even get paid more than doctors.

The way it works is that they get rid of medicaid, medicare and insurance. Then they charge patients a small monthly fee, the same way you run a gym membership.

It's cheaper for the patient, they get better care, can go to the doctor 30 times a month if they want and pay the same flat rate. In fact they are booming, there is a huge demand for physicians to start their own practices with this model.

All the patient needs to do is take care of catastrophic problems with insurance. They can use a health saving account or go with the usual insurance providers for that.

So there are solutions to at least primary care to reduce cost and provide better care. The same thing could be done with major illnesses, but with all the regulations most people just go with the major insurance companies because it's all they can do. They are slaves to the system.

As Rand Paul pointed out, with lasik eye surgeries that he performs, he has to compete with other eye doctors and keep his procedure prices as low as possible. That's because the government doesn't regulate those operations since they classify them as cosmetic.

So with a government option, what it seems to do is put a band aid on a big gaping wound. They know the money is not there and it will end up hurting people financially in our current economy. And it doesn't address the problems of government regulation itself. One of the main reasons costs are kept so high.

While a free market system won't make all the costs go away, just imagine if a typical operation was priced $10,000.00 less for a $40,000.00 operation if competition was allowed between regulated surgical procedures. Would $30,000.00 still be a lot? Yes, but saving $10,000.00 is still a huge savings in that kind of system. It would make health savings accounts more viable and if someone didn't have insurance, it would be much easier to pay off.

--------------------------------------------------
Get your free Ron Paul Educational DVD Bomb files!
http://www.content.animateclay.com/ronpaul/ronpauldvdbomb.html

Good thing Qliance isn't in New York

They'd be shut down...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/state_slaps_dr_do_good...

--------------------------------
Lets face it, the average Amerikan is an idiot..
-Ira Freeman

...let it not be said that we did nothing.
-Ron Paul

That's insane, I'm sure if

That's insane, I'm sure if the same system started in NY it would be extremely popular in no time.

--------------------------------------------------
Get your free Ron Paul Educational DVD Bomb files!
http://www.content.animateclay.com/ronpaul/ronpauldvdbomb.html

I guess logic can even escape a noted novelist!

The Rockefeller-Carnegie medical system (circa 1910) begot the corporate insurance scheme when that system ... never intended to cure illness ... became too expensive for the average person. So, rather than lose the business, they devised the insurance industry scheme whereby everybody got to share in the payments extracted from the hapless sick by the medical industry.

Government is just the legal entity whereby the robber barons keep robbing us, legally. A faceless government bureaucracy is used to keep the lid on alternative medicine and promote the medical industry, the pharmaceutical industry, "Brave New World" experimentation, etc. Government intrusion into medicine destroyed what used to be the charity hospitals and, by force of laws and regulations, co-opted them into the system.

I wouldn't go near an AMA doctor or one of their hospitals, or take one of their poison pharmaceuticals, so I don't need or want their "health care" insurance. Alternative care exists. The treatments, by comparison, are dirt cheap. You can cure almost anything ... including cancer ... for a pittance of the $13,000 yearly insurance payment Cohen makes (and for which, he receives nothing but promises).

Finally, we are all destined to die. I will not donate organs nor would I accept organs or any extraordinary means to prolong my life. (Irony of ironies, these days they withhold food and water ... nothing too extraordinary about them ... to kill people off as fast as possible). Besides, the way this country is going, I'm more likely to die during a war or revolution than from natural causes.

The sad thing is, with the overarching faceless Frankenstinian government intrusion into our bodies, they will probably do their jackboot dance on the alternative doctors.

God have mercy on us.

I guess empathy can escape even a religious zealot!

Nice of you to take your organs with you to the grave in a final selfish act cloaked in religious righteousness.

Perhaps you're just ignorant ...

of the fact that in order to gain a usable heart, they must keep the "dying" patient alive and REMOVE A BEATING HEART so that it will be in good condition for the rich guy who can afford to purchase your heart.

Perhaps you don't realize that the Chinese government does a brisk business in body parts "donated" by Chinese prisoners without their consent and placed in the bodies of those whose lives are apparently worth more than some poor prisoner's life.

Perhaps you haven't understood that the only organ you can donate, without it killing you, is one of your kidneys ... because you can live with one kidney. Every other organ they take out WILL kill you. So, the big question is: do you trust our medical-industrial complex to be more interested in keeping you alive, or making big bucks on your body parts? Hmmmmmmm ... wadaya think?

Now, go and donate your own organs. I'll keep mine, thank you very much!

Perhaps you are just a poor excuse for a human being.

Perhaps you shouldn't make wildly ignorant assumptions about something you apparently know absolutely jack squat about, you fear-breathing, mindless monkey.

Let me tell you a story.

Once upon a time, there was a man who met a medical student. He had known this medical student for only two weeks when, by happenstance, he found out through a third-party that this medical student was suffering from kidney disease, and despite ongoing dialysis, did not have long to live if she did not receive a new kidney.

This man immediately contacted the medical student and offered one of his kidneys. She refused out of cynicism and guilt. However, this man persisted. He argued that god had put him in this life to be of use to others, and since he had two functioning kidneys, of which he only needed one, it would be selfish of him "to hang onto the other one just for a rainy day." This was that rainy day, he argued. She finally accepted his offer. This man went right down to the hospital to start the paperwork and to test for a match.

Three days later, in a twist of tragic irony, this man was involved in a horrible traffic accident. When the paramedics arrived at the scene, he was at first seizing and apnic, and then completely unresponsive. CPR was performed, and a pulse was finally renewed, though it faded in and out intermittently. The paramedics, undeterred by the grim outlook, fought valiantly to save this man every inch of the way as they raced him desperately to the local hospital. Upon arrival at the emergency room, the efforts intensified. Twice more they brought his pulse back from nothing, and after hours of intense struggle, they were finally able to stabilize his pulse and breathing by means of ventilation. His broken neck was then stabilized carefully, at which point the most reknowned and brightest neurosurgeons in the metro area immediately collaborated on testing and diagnosing his injuries. It didn't take long, however, for the test results to come back; the brain damage inflicted during the accident was catastrophic and complete. After five days on a ventilator with minimal brain activity indicating life, he finally succumbed in totality to the injuries.

This man was my brother, Luke.

His status as a voluntary organ donor in life and in death- as indicated not only by his proactive efforts to give his kidney, but also clearly indicated by the big label on his driver's license for the world to see- did not impact the way he was treated in ANY manner WHATSOEVER throughout this ENTIRE ordeal, by ANY medical professional.

In the end, the medical student did receive Luke's kidney, though obviously not as originally intended, and she is alive because of it. In addition, more than 60 other recipients of all ages and backgrounds received organs of one kind or another from Luke, many of which were vital and life-saving transplants. We know for a fact that many children were saved because of Luke, and likewise many parents were saved because of Luke, to be their for their children in a manner that he unfortunately no longer can be for his 5-year old son, to whom he served not only as provider and example, but as hero and best friend.

While the unfortunate abuse of organ transplant capabilities in an exploitive manner by countries or by individuals is reprehensible, by no twist of rationale does that even come CLOSE to meaning that ALL organ donation is vile, immoral, involuntary and corrupt.

Frankly, 4GodinVA, you are- at best- a paranoid, selfish, self-righteous phucking moron.

reedr3v's picture

Thanks for sharing the story of your

amazing and wonderful brother. Of course freedom supports his generosity as well as those who'd fear his choice for themselves.

I think our current system promotes paranoia because the rulers have lied so blatantly so many times, people less and less believe anything they say, including "experts" and "officials" all down the line of command. It is one terribly broken system that may have to fail entirely before sound rebuilding can occur. So long as people support force of law against those who hold differing views there will always be virulent conflict or tyrannical suppression of dissent.

I am hoping humans can stumble toward cooperation and peace.

WOW!

To believe that pat story, I'll require proof.

As you keep descending into base vulgarity, you certainly don't do Luke's memory any honor.

Also, while we're passing

Also, while we're passing judgment, 4GodinVA, let's recap some of your highlights, shall we?

"I guess logic can even escape a noted novelist!" - Yeah, that's not too judgmental huh? Boy, you sure are doing your god a lot of glory and honor right from the start here. What's next...

"Finally, we are all destined to die. I will not donate organs nor would I accept organs or any extraordinary means to prolong my life." - Translation: My organs are MINE! You can't have them! I either do not care about god's will, or else I presume to know what his will is, which is that he wouldn't want me to do this; in the former case, it's selfish; the latter is blasphemous. Boy you really are humble before the lord and deserving of your username on this site! Let's move on.

"Perhaps you're just ignorant of the fact that in order to gain a usable heart, they must keep the "dying" patient alive and REMOVE A BEATING HEART so that it will be in good condition for the rich guy who can afford to purchase your heart." - Point 1: you're a dumbass. There are two ways to donate; one is directly to someone you choose, the other is randomly, in which case there is a donor list organized in a manner that has absolutely nothing to do with social class. Point 2: you assume that all donors are "dying", and not already dead. But, that kinda goes back to point 1 (you're a dumbass), doesn't it? Point 3: you are preaching to someone who has ACTUALLY experienced all of this, by the bedside of a family member. But you didn't think twice about that when you started your rant. How embarrassing (not to mention arrogant, of course- another quality befitting your humble servitude before god in virginia). More porridge, sir?

"Perhaps you haven't understood that the only organ you can donate, without it killing you, is one of your kidneys ... because you can live with one kidney. Every other organ they take out WILL kill you." Once again, you assume, like a dumbass, that a donor is sitting on a hospital bed in perfectly good health, and a doctor is going to come in and pull out his heart like an Indian Jones Temple of Doom scene. Dumbass. They treat you forever and ever if that is your choice, or the family's choice. It is ONLY when the patient is completely lifeless that they would even begin the process of either extracting organs (if patient is a declared organ donor), or consulting the family for a decision to do so if there is no declaration and the patient is on some kind of ventilator. But, wonderful job being a prick about something you had no clue about while talking to someone who does. Your god would be proud, I'm sure.

"Now, go and donate your own organs. I'll keep mine, thank you very much!" - Really classy stuff here, totally selfless. Yup, god himself couldn't have said it better! (sarcasm intended). And finally...

"As you keep descending into base vulgarity, you certainly don't do Luke's memory any honor." - Once again, just really classy stuff. Talking about something you have no clue about (hmmm... that sounds familiar. at least you are a creature of habit), and passing judgment yet again. Luke's life stands on its own merits, my actions reflect on me and only me, there is no need for me to attempt to justify anything. However, it delights me to highlight the sheer hypocrisy of your lowly, self-contradicting approach to social interactions online, which betray any and all associations you could ever possibly claim to have to the god your arrogantly incorporated into your username.

One final point. You see, I'm not religious in any way, nor do I believe in god, so I have the distinct advantage of being a total asshole and not being a hypocrite. On the other hand, you either are"4 God", or you are not. So I would encourage you to mull it over, and make your choice. And think before typing next time- for god's sake.

I never claimed to be as

I never claimed to be as good a person as my brother.

http://www.lukeliveson.com

I tried the link but it won't open for me

I feel heartily sorry for you. You are dealing with grief as an atheist. And, in your mind, offering Luke's organs was the best way to somehow make him live on. It is absolutely natural that you would be upset with me. But sometimes confronting a hard reality is the first step in the healing process.

Let me say that your brother's soul certainly does life on ... the real Luke ... the person ... not just some body parts. Secondly, if you would get on your knees and pray to God for Luke, I think you would find true consolation and relief. Just go into your room, close the door and do it. No one but God has to see you.

I'll be praying for both or you.

Wow, your arrogance truly

Wow, your arrogance truly knows no bounds.

"In your mind, offering Luke's organs was the best way to somehow make him live on." Where the hell did you read this from me? You are pulling crap out of thin air; there is really something wrong with you to be this presumptive and judgmental, and then feel like you are acting on behalf of a god; any god.

Let me clarify for your ignorant, assumptive dumb ass once more: I admire Luke for being a selfless human being in life and in death; I don't see his organ donation as him "living on" in any sense.

"But sometimes confronting a hard reality is the first step in the healing process." Again, where the hell are you getting the idea that you need to counsel me on "confronting a hard reality?" Once more, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, and yet you are so comfortable blindly giving direction. Such a good little humble servant to the lord you are...

"Secondly, if you would get on your knees and pray to God for Luke, I think you would find true consolation and relief." Another poor assumption- that I haven't already found true consolation and relief. And this is without picking apart your religious beliefs one at a time to highlight the sheer lunacy and hypocrisy of it...

You need to check yourself into religious rehab, my friend. Because you are falling far short of practicing the humility that any god would expect from his followers.

Very sorry for your loss

I'm sure you miss him more than words can express. However, no one should be forced to be an organ donor. Everyone is (presently) free to make that decision. In China, that is not the case & there is a huge market for human organs.

reedr3v's picture

Excellent analysis'

godinva.

Thanks

Wish it weren't so.

Another example of slavery

I cannot opt out and go looking for something better in the free market.

In my industry I have to work for a major corporation, sacrifice larger pay for the insurance overlords, and accept whatever terms they give as they consolidate services. Pre-existing spouse conditions prevent ANY chance of going it alone.

.....and I'm lucky

Excellent post !!! All those

Excellent post !!! All those private insurance are one of the biggest scams ever existed in this country... only the fractional reserve banking is bigger.

If you check the names ...

All the scams (including AMA style medicine) are brought to you by the very same people who brought you theFed.

people are confusing health

people are confusing health care and health insurance because the different kinds of insurance are what regulates health care itself, thanks to managed care. the insurance companies, both government and private(if you want to call it that) call the shots when it comes to what services they are going to pay for the individual receiving treatment. so, this post is right on. we already have government run health CARE, and insurance is a part of that. in a real free market system(india), there would probably be no insurance whatsoever.
most of us here want a completely free market, but i don't think a lot folks here understand what happens in a free market.

Wonder what our society did before the invention of insurance

oh, I know, we paid our own bills! Take A-man's advice & quit complaining. I hate insurance & only carry what is absolutely required. You know, government mandated car insurance, mortgage insurance, etc.

Before the invention of

Before the invention of insurance millions of babies, kids and adults were dying from lack of any medical care... pneumonia was as deadly as cancer and life expectancy was much shorter... Of course those rich enough could get medical care and paid their bills themselves. Right know "Bill Gates" can pay $1200 insurance premium and enjoy nice medical care paid by millions American workers that pay insurance premium bigger than their medicare, federal and state tax combined... and if they loose their job no matter how many years they were paying for "Bill Gates" medical care they have to go bankrupt in the event of any major surgery or serious disease.

You have bought into the lies

that the government has been selling you that you have to have health insurance to afford medical care. I have a problem with conventional medicine's cut & prescribe methods of practice, which is advocated by health insurance. Clean living & alternative medicine works for most that try it. Additionally, I don't have a problem with the rich being rich. I appreciate the fact that they have the money & the desire to hire my skills.

Wait till your kid or spouse

Wait till your kid or spouse would require appendix surgery... and heal it "with clean living and herbal tea" yourself. I bet it will work for your loved ones...

I don't have problem with rich being rich I have problem with rich being rich from exploiting work of others.
Money makes money... specially money you get for free from FED or government bailout...... hard work makes you good slave... with one in a million chance to become rich... that is a free market capitalistic corporate system we enjoy today.

You missed the point

Catastrophic insurance (which my family has) is for emergencies. From your mocking post of 'herbal tea', I suggest that you educate yourself about alternative medicine. As for free markets, we don't have free markets now & haven't had for a VERY long time because of our government regulations. Additionally, I recommend that you read some of Dr. Paul's books & his weekly column found here: http://www.house.gov/apps/blog/tx14_paul/

"Right know "Bill Gates" can pay $1200 insurance premium"-You

I don't think Bill Gates needs insurance, I think he can pay it directly from his savings.

reedr3v's picture

janusz, you are imagining that health

costs are valid at their current levels (astronomical) but in my own lifetime medical costs were at levels ordinary people could afford.
Courtesy of government inflation that ruined the purchasing power of our dollars, prices are far higher; add the enormous costs of bureaucracy, licensing, regulation etc. We are looking at an problem of such massive proportions many of us are priced out of the restricted market.

Actually Bill Gates has created thousands of jobs and products that consumers value. The people who don't pay their way are not the producers like Gates. He pays tons in taxes. The true people who are leeches on the system and pulling it down are all the non-productive, wasteful politicians and bureaucrats and their lobbying cronies.

Bill Gates created thousands

Bill Gates created thousands of jobs with help of thousands of very smart people but he also killed thousands of jobs by his monopolistic practices. If you like monopoly he should be your hero.

Hear hear!

"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."-Benjamin Franklin

It sounds like

you're flushing 13k a year down the toilet. If you're truly "healthy" then you really don't need a health "plan."

Get catastrophic insurance only, with 10k deductable, it will be much cheaper in the long run. Take the savings and put into an emergency fund that collects interest and/or buy precious metals.

Health "plans" are very expensive and only benefit the insurance company. Funny how this is exactly what is being forced down our throats.

Hear hear!

"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."-Benjamin Franklin

Your insurance company unlike government run systems...

does not go bankrupt and pass the cost of its mistakes onto individuals who did not desire its services and did not invest in it.

If you don't like it. Don't purchase it.
If you think it can be done better. Go do it better.

If you think that 'waste' can be cut out of the system then go start an insurance company.

They set the price, tell me what treatment I can and can’t get, and, every three or four months, raise the price whether I like it or not.

They do the math. They decide what treatments are affordable based on 1. how many people are contributing to the same risk pool, 2. how much they each pay in, and 3. how likely it is that people in the pool will become sick.

Its a system of rationing, but its a system you voluntarily elected to become a part of.

Rising prices in a sector of the economy that the government lavishes with money? You don't say.

News flash! Economics 101: Supply and demand-- When there are more buyers than sellers prices go up (Especially when one of the primary buyers monetizes debt *cough* prints money *cough cough* in order to purchase the goods being sought).

For the love of god not everything needs to be solved with a nationwide federal program.

sacohen's picture

Maybe I should start my own army . . .

The Army of the Republic

Thanks for the post. Glad to see people can disagree without being abusive.

I'm not sure what you're saying here, dlind: That because Insurance Companies can keep raising the prices and constantly changing their plans, the mere fact that they're still in business in itself justifies what they're doing?

I suppose I could start my own insurance company, since I'm not happy with my company. And while I'm at it, since I don't like Haliburton and Blackwater, I guess I could start my own army, too. And if I'm not happy with how Citigroup or Goldman Sachs runs its business, I could start my own global bank. My point here is that government does serve a purpose and Capitalism isn't some divine mechanism that can be presumed to always be working for the public good. Insurance companies, like the highly concentrated monopoly capitalism of the financial sector, don't necessarily serve the common good, especially when they have the money and power to game the system which should otherwise keep the playing field level.

But gaming the system isn't even the poinit. Insurance companies are a huge part of the problem because they create a vast useless bureaucracy, both on their side and on the doctor/hospital side of the equation. They've taken a vital service, interposed themselves and are leveraging their position in a way that makes medical care delivery very inefficient. Yes, it's only part of the problem, but it's a huge part not suffered in foreign countries that have comparable or better care than ours at half the cost.

As I said in my post, sure, I could just refuse insurance, but everything I have would be at risk in the event that a major sickness in my family forced to participate in our out-of-control, insurance-bloated health care system. Why does that have to be the choice?

Supply and Demand is only part of economics, and it was a groundbreaking idea when Adam Smith and David Ricardo riffed on it a couple of hundred years ago. However, that wasn't the end of economic history. I would humbly suggest you look into the work of Joseph Steiglitz, who recently won a Nobel prize for his ideas about the role of information in economics. You may already have come across it. Basically, how well-informed you are makes a huge difference in your economic situation (insider trading being an obvious example). You can google him and find a lot of articles.

I've been doing business in South America and Asia since 1984, and I know what an intrusive government looks like. I've expended lots of energy over the years trying to end-run government regulations in places like Peru or China. In this case, though, I think health care is something the government can do well.

Cheers

Stuart

I really wish people would stop confusing Health CARE with

health INSURANCE.

They are NOT one and the same.

In fact, the high cost of care, can in large part be attributed directly to the existence of insurance. Insurance, certainly as it functions today, distorts the price mechanism in the health care markets. The market always attempts to "clear" and reach equilibrium. We need a restoration of the price mechanism, not further distortion and ignorance of it.

Socialists do not understand the function of prices in the distribution of resources. That's why they constantly resort to central planning, and why they always get it wrong. (because you CAN'T central plan. Price will always defeat you)

reedr3v's picture

Agreed, it is one sick system we are

stuck in, I just think the only way out is to trim down government legislation, licensing, permits, regulations, bureaucracy, etc. so it can't continue to screw up everything it touches including health care.
If alternative practitioners weren't restricted from practicing so many types of health care, for instance, we'd have cheaper (and in my opinion) better choices, and some competition among insurers for those clients who practice a healthy lifestyle and don't participate in the drug/slash/burn medical modes promoted by government monopolies for the AMA, BigPharma, etc.

Btw, I'm reading your Army of the Republic now, am thoroughly enjoying it, wondering how it's going to play out. Wicked tension you set up with the Dad and Lando.

sacohen's picture

I'm not sure govt. regulation is the biggest part of the problem

I'll post my thoughts above.

Glad you like the book. At it's heart, I think it's a very simple parable. I'll reply to your thoughs about health care above.