In An Ideal America Every Person Should Be Free

0 votes

Mises Daily by Leonard Read

http://mises.org/story/3740

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

positive vs. negative rights

I don't like positive listings of things people should have. It can give the false impression that those freedoms being listed:

1. are being granted to you by some higher authority
2. are limited to those enumerated
3. can be regulated

Also, if there's a list that begins "everyone should be free to…", then socialists will come along and add to the list -- "…be free to have free access to healthcare", etc.

I prefer negative rights -- everyone should be free from... aggression against their person or property.

Positive vs. Negative Rights

Gee, what a logical article

The author forwards the notion that people ought to own themselves and the fruits of their labor and be free to associate as they wish.

(He's obviously a terrorist bent on destroying freedom... /end sarcasm)

True freedom

is the ability to be left alone. Simple as that. That's the freedom they'll never let people have.