Why Ayn Rand is Hot Again

0 votes

Why Ayn Rand is Hot Again
The unconservative Ayn Rand and her relationship to the American right

Brian Doherty | October 10, 2009

Sources from The New York Times to the United Kingdom's Guardian agree that 2009 is the Year of Ayn Rand. Fortuitously surfing the wave of Rand fascination is the first thorough and largely unbiased book about her life and ideas by a serious American academic, one neither a personal friend nor a bitter enemy of the controversial Russian-born novelist and philosopher.

Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right, by University of Virginia historian Jennifer Burns, delivers a smart assessment of Rand's life and ideas and how they influenced each other. On what her book's title promises—the connections between Rand and the American right wing—Ms. Burns is less convincing, though she does provide enough data to make it clear why Rand has never really been a "goddess" to the American right.

Why is Rand, dead since 1982, so hot again today? Ironically, big government, one of Rand's betes noires, is stimulating her sales. Her more than 1,000-page 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, sold 25 percent more copies in the first half of this year than it sold in all of last year, shipping a total of 300,000 copies so far this year—tremendous success for a 52-year-old novel.

Readers and pundits alike look at America and see a world scarily reminiscent of Rand's government-choked dystopia in Atlas. It's a world with a struggling economy where political pull matters more than success in the free market, where the government blithely takes over huge transportation industries.

Ms. Burns says Rand was "among the first to identify the problem of the modern state's often terrifying power and make it an issue of popular concern." Seeking the foundation of Rand's ferocious mistrust of government—especially government motivated by altruism—Ms. Burns skillfully re-creates the young Alisa Rosenbaum's (Rand's name before creating the "Rand" identity when she moved to America in 1926) experiences watching Bolshevism destroy her family's way of life in Russia.

Rand saw communism purportedly motivated by a desire to help elevate the downtrodden and, as Ms. Burns writes, became fascinated with "the failure of good intentions." The novelist countered communism with her own moral philosophy that elevated "selfishness"—the belief that your happiness is your proper goal and your accomplishments are a necessary means to happiness. This Randian morality was meant, Ms. Burns wrote, to "eliminate all virtues that could possibly be used in the service of totalitarianism."

Continue here: http://reason.com/archives/2009/10/10/why-ayn-rand-is-hot-again

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Historian looks at Ayn Rand with John Stewart...

The Daily Show interview with Jennifer Burns on Ayn Rand, Goddess of the Right.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/252488/thu-october...

in peace & liberty,
Treg

Thank you Treg

It's a shame Jennifer Burns does not look at Ayn Rand as a woman, because she could have answered some of JS's questions about why the right ultimately rejects Ayn Rand.. Ayn Rand is a woman, and conservatives have a dilimna, in that Ayn hersaelf said she would never support a woman as Commander in Chief... it is immoral for a woman to lead the military... And since much of the military industrial complex comes from the right, Ayn "outs" herself as a leader by her own idea of what a woman's place is. And this is perhaps the next chapter for Ayn Rand's Objectivism?

Still, to me, she was simply an artist, trying to exist in a world of liars, cheats, and thieves.

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

glaring omission in this article

Ron Paul has done a great deal for the Ayn Rand revival.

Ironically, this is true

And I say Ironically because Rothbard and Rand were enemies in the end, BIG TIME enemies and I doubt very much Ayn Rand would support Ron Paul today, even though he represents her ideas more than anyone else running.

I believe, that the fight is not against a NWO, but for a Mises NWO, and Ayn Rand's Objectivism is a perfect tool to accomplish this, if we do not want to become a Muslim nation.

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

Isabel Paterson is better

Even though she only wrote one book, it had none of the poretension of Rand's works, and allowed for personal altruism, the lack of which let rand open for alot of criticism.

Plus - you can read "The God of the Machine" online here ( there is actually a chapter Called "Why real money is indispensable"

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9557730/The-God-of-the-Machine-by-...

good book to read

Miquel de Unamuno is even better that Pat...

Ayn Rand has accomplished far more than Pat dared to dream.

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

Rand had wider influence

But I think she made individualism and freedom seem mean.

Thanks for the Unamuno reference, I was unaware of him.

I found "TheTragic Sense Of Life" online at project gutenberg http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14636/14636-8.txt

Plus I love this quote "Sometimes, to remain silent is to lie, since silence can be interpreted as assent."

ironman77 I think being surrounded by crooks made her "mean"

"Letters of Ayn Rand", http://www.amazon.com/Letters-Ayn-Rand/dp/0452274044 a collection of letters she wrote, really gives you a picture of who Ayn Rand was.

In my opinion, she was an artist, John Gault is an artist, an artist is a producer, a person who was born "gifted", they produce something out of nothing... like books.. and so how does the artist, protect themselves? And to me, from the perspective of an artist, not a banker, not a believer in a religion, but an artist.. not as an entertainer, but the artist behind the act, the self.. how does a talented person protect their "gift" from government and corprate crooks? She talks about Isabel Paterson, it's where I learned about Miquel de Unamuno.. facinating history.. history repeats itself and we all have somethiung to learn from Unamuno's experience. He was a VERY brave patriot and it's a shame we do not have intellectuals like him today... perhaps we will.. history being repetitive. In the wiki link, the quote you like is given in context.. I think you'll LOVE the story wiki tells about that quote.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_de_Unamuno

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

Good interview with Ayn Rand on YouTube

Mike Wallace, 1959. Still good, still valid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ukJiBZ8_4k

Thank you!

Lots of great interviews with her on youtube

gratitude

Thank you so much for posting the link to her interview ... timeless wisdom!

You're welcome

As you may have seen, there are other interviews with Ms. Rand on YouTube.

Here is a later one, with Tom Snyder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4doTzCs9lEc&feature=related