Should the "free market" create Electronic Medical Records?
Everybody agrees that electronic medical records (EMR's) are the way of the future.
The federal government is basically forcing hospitals and doctors offices into converting to EMR's on an urgent timetable (admittedly a bad way to do it).
Because interoperability (easy, fast, and cheap communication between doctors, hospitals, etc.) is necessary to reap most of the benefits of an EMR, some type of universal "standard" is inevitable.
In other words, while there may be a bunch of EMR software vendors today, very soon there will only be one or two. (Think Microsoft/ Apple or internet browsers.)
I think this is what economists would call a "natural monopoly".
The government has already spent billions of dollars writing software for the VA system. Now they are proposing to give this EMR (called VistA) away free as an open source product to commercial hospitals.
Should the government do this?
If they do, is this fair to the free enterprise software vendors?
If they don't, isn't this just pouring taxpayer's money down a rathole?
Does it make any sense for many software vendors to create multiple proprietary (and incompatible) systems and then let them fight to the death in the marketplace knowing that we are going to end up with a virtual monopoly anyway?
Isn't this horribly inefficient?
What about the poor schmuck hospital that ends up buying software for millions of dollars only to be forced into dumping it later and purchasing the new "standard", ie market winner? (Think VHS vs. Betamax.)
Is this a case where the free market really isn't the best answer?





















"Should the "free market"
"Should the "free market" create Electronic Medical Records?"
Sure. I have worked in the medical industry and the tediousness of the paperwork is just mind boggling. Companies have to hire alot of additional staff just to handle paperwork, they have to hire contractors to store or destroy the paperwork. They pass the cost of this onto the consumer. If the consumer can save money on medical expenses then they can use that money towards something else, like maybe ice cream from the local dairy farm and maybe that farm can stay in business or hire more hands. The point is that electronic medical records can help the medical industry save money and hopefully pass those savings onto the patient. But if the government gets involved then they will totally ruin the efficiency and the regulation would probably put a bigger burden on smaller medical companies that can't afford to quickly switch to the new system.
http://www.meetup.com/RP2012GrandJunctionCO
YEA, EMR's are the wave of
YEA, EMR's are the wave of the future, but why ? They are only going to provide more unemployment & excess efficiency, which has brought us to TODAY..We need human "stimulation" not unhuman stimulation that machines have brought ..Control is data base , control is centralization, control is getting rid of so called waste, control places more into the hands of a few...Machines have made this possible... In theory it all is wonderfull ..It has now become our undoing ..We can out produce ourselves & those who would control , now have the capabillity they lacked years ago ..They have traded off human hands for machine hands.. This centeralizes the power to a few who get to designate what is sustainable & who is sustainable...
Agenda 21..And I am not against Technology , but am for the correct & appropriate use of Technology ..Perversions have brought us to this point in human history...Humankind is about to be userped by the USERPER..
Did you ever hear of a snake in the grass ? Yes he has come down out of the tree...Seeking whom he may devour...
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
a free market is about FREEDOM
"some type of universal "standard" is inevitable."
Yes. Define the XML schema and publish it.
"while there may be a bunch of EMR software vendors today, very soon there will only be one or two. (Think Microsoft/ Apple or internet browsers.)"
That is a big assumption.
"Does it make any sense for many software vendors to create multiple proprietary (and incompatible) systems and then let them fight to the death in the marketplace"
That is a free market.
"Isn't this horribly inefficient?"
Free markets are about freedom, not necessarily about efficiency.
"What about the poor schmuck hospital that ends up buying software for millions of dollars only to be forced into dumping it later and purchasing the new "standard", ie market winner?"
In a free market, there is no forcing.
http://FlipFlopRomney.blogspot.com
If the software was developed with public funds, then the
product of that expenditure should belong to the public. I don't think I'd have any difficulty with the VA turning over software to individuals or companies who, I presume, are already aware that they will also have to employ MUMPS in order to use it. I don't think having the government develop anything is efficient. The availability of Vista doesn't seem to have kept independent developers from writing and publishing various software products that form, interpret and exchange electronic patient information. There's quite a few of them around. The "fight to the death" scenario you propose is not exactly new to a competitive marketplace, nor is it bad. This struggle goes on every day among companies who publish competing products that adhere to such electronic document formatting/exchange standards.
As to the "multiple proprietary (and incompatible) systems", while the internal operations and structure of a given software product is certainly going to be proprietary, the methods employed in the formatting, interpretation and exchange of electronic formats (under say a general heading of ANSI-837) are not proprietary in and of themselves. This is after all one of the alleged purposes of establishing a public standard by which all vendors are informed as to the nature of information, used as input for their software product, as well as required structures and content to be present in any information produced as output by a given software product. The documents describing them are available from many sources, both public and private, and those standards represent the common basis for information exchange between whatever software products are applied in a given commercial healthcare environment.
_________________________________________
"An economy built on fiat money is a society on its way to ashes."
_________________________________________
"An economy built on fiat money is a society on its way to ashes."