An Interview with Government
An interview with government:
Earlier today, I sat down and tried to interview government. The following is the attempt of a dialogue with he/she/they/it.
Me: Thank you for joining me today.
Government: No response.
Me: Do you mind if I ask some questions?
Government: No response.
Me: Well, I will just ask and hope that you answer.
Government: No response
Me: How would you define government?
Government: No response
Me: Well, dictionary.com defines you as “the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states.” Is that correct?
Government: No response
Me: I guess that will be yes. If you are established to protect and maintain individual rights, then why are you all about control for even the basic root of your name government is govern which is to control? Also, will it matter the layers of protection of social contracts? Will they ever prevent you from being yourself?
Government: No response
Me: So are you refusing to answer?
Government: No response
Me: Well, if you are all about control then it is a psychological problem here. So no matter whom “I vote in” (since you do control the process and counting the votes and you are by nature control), it will not help me will it?
Government: No response
Me: I will take that your no response is that you are acting at your very nature and are all about control over me: my life, property, and pursuit of happiness. I guess we are done here and I will only state facts until you finally respond.
1. Government by nature is about control.
2. Government has said that it derives its control from me.
3. I do not approve nor have I ever approved of what you have or will do; therefore, I withdraw consent.
4. Since I have withdrawn consent, I doubt that you will leave me alone since at your nature are all about control and power over me.
5. Government has said it derives this consent by the Constitution.
6. I like the Constitution; however, I have never signed it nor agreed to it.
7. The Constitution is either a party to the one of the worst crimes –you stealing, murdering, raping, and enslaving- or unable to protect me from you and worthless.
8. In fact, no one ever has signed it as a party to it, but as witnesses.
9. Those who voted on the enactment of it did not attempt to oppress their prodigy nor could they have.
10. Those who were able to vote on it were super-rich white landowners- a minority of the then population- who could never enter a contract on my behalf which requires the agreement of the at least two groups or parties or more signing it.
11. Government says since I was born here I am under it and their control.
12. I never consented to that.
13. I guess it was never about consent since at your nature is about control and could and would never relinquish such control.
14. The only difference between government and slavery is that at least slavery calls it for what it is and does not lie that slavery or the slave owners protect the enslaved.
15. What shall I do about your lying, stealing, murdering, raping, and enslaving nature?
16. Protest? Heck No, as long as you control. For you do not care and shall not listen. Vote? You control it and I do not approve of it! Violent revolution? No, since I do not wish to stoop to your level and I cannot fight fire with fire, but with water. Civil disobedience? She is my only option and I shall use her. Oh, I shall use her.
The was really great.
Very enlightening. At first I thought you had copied this from somewhere.
"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle." Sun Tzu - The Art of War
Excellent analogy, like
Excellent analogy, like talking to a Brick Wall!
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."- Thomas Jefferson
There is no Left or Right -- there is only freedom or tyranny. Everything else is an illusion, an obfuscation to keep you confused and silent as the world burns around you." - Philip Brennan
"Invest only in things that you can stand in front of and pr
Thanks. That is partly what
Thanks. That is partly what I was going for.
With or Without the
With or Without the Constitution , You will get tyranny of a sort you wish you would not have to face, if you persue your chosen ideal.
There is ONLY ONE end, HE is the BEGINNING of peace.
Why do you suppose they try to copy HIM ?
Why do you suppose HE is being copied by the Deceiver ?All the way to the BEGINNING. A-O ?
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
Fantastic post.
There is no path to peace, there is only peace.
Civil disobedience is the only way.
The Constitution is
The Constitution is defensive mechanisum.. Try implimenting the Declaration of Independance ..It's still the law of the land..
Just for your consumption, I'm not advocating any action.
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
What are you talking
What are you talking about?
The Constitution is four pieces of paper with writing on it.
I do not wish to implement anything on any other person for that is government's job. For if you can implement on another, then you have control and I wish not to control any other person for that is slavery.
The word law is an opinion of a select group of men and women which can be changed as fast as the wind blows which is no more obligatory toward me without my consent than my opinion on others without consent.
I understand you ideal, &
I understand you ideal, & yes it would be nice, but we live in a real World not a vertual one..There is a Deceiver that needs delt with.
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
So lets do as 'the deciever' does and allow theft and murder...
to keep the thieves and murderers at bay, right?
Tell me oh fortune cookie master, who would Jesus tax? Who would Jesus murder for not paying that tax? Which brown skinned people would Jesus kill for the 'greater good' of certain interests?
You're right, there is deception that must be dealt with, and people who decieve to be shown for what they are. Go look in the mirror and ask yourself the questions I ask above and ask yourself which god you truly worship.
OK oreo ..You must be using
OK oreo ..You must be using 2 names as the questions above are of another's....So here goes your answer mr hot shot ...God is about control & yes, I do believe..I hear HIS voice & I follow HIM....The Spirit of God has been given for the very purpose of CONTROL..Control, to bring about, that which is to become, Christ or God like, in Charachter...Christ showed us the FATHER for a reason..HE & THE FATHER are ONE..This is the very reason a person is brought to the knowledge of Christ ..This Character is in a person's best interests & meets God's measure to go into Eternity with Him..This is not accomplishable without God beginning the work in the individual's soul..So your premis that control is bad for you has no Spiritual or individual.purpose...EVERYONE is controlled by their Belief system that makes them an individual entity...Even You, want to control others to be as you believe they should live or you wouldn't be advancing your ideals..So you too are guilty of being a cookey master..Try your jargen on some other nimble mind ..There are plenty of willing prospects ..
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
My premise is not that
My premise is not that control is bad, but that involuntary control is bad when it is an adult person over another adult person i.e. slavery.
God is on a different level since God is perfect and is about justice, love, and peace.
I would agree that people have a tendency to desire control and power hence the idea is to remove that involuntary ability.
I would suggest that you read 1 Samuel 8, Genesis 1-3, Matthew 4-6 and Romans 11-13.
You didn't answer a single one of the questions I posed
As for the rest of your mostly incoherent rant, all you've proven is how ignorant you are. Jesus didn't tell us we'd know who was His by the number of people we controlled, did he?
What the heck are you talking about?
You say "The Constitution is defensive mechanisum.."
Please explain your assertion.
Independance was not won on
Independance was not won on defensive manouvering ..It was won by offensive action by real people who fought & died...Your freedoms today , if there are any, have been bought with the blood of real people..People who stood up for your Right to execise the Law contained in the Constitution..The Declaration was backed by action. Offensive ..The Constitution if let to stand on merit alone has no merit..The peoples' actions weather peacefull or otherwise, control it's destiny.. Therefore it is mearly a defensive document , only a warning device to the gov't..
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
Gov't is people , the
Gov't is people , the Constitution is a paper document ..Which one would you be afraid of ? Get over the deception..It's people
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen
Bump! For "me"
Very clever! thanks!
I like this part: Civil disobedience? She is my only option and I shall use her. Oh, I shall use her.
***************
"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd
"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd
Thank you.
Thank you.