We need our own hybrid satellite/cable news channel serving Liberty

http://www.breakthematrix.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi_y-Ly2pEU

Thought that was their goal?

PUBLIC ACCESS TELEVISION

LOW POWER FM STATIONS

--
Host, The Next Step Podcast
http://thenextstep.podomatic.com

I suspect all broadcast, or at least all but the broadest of broadcast (like super bowl) will be moving to IP delivery (internet), as it makes it sooo much easier and more accurate to measure viewer numbers, and viewer response. Advertisers love that stuff, which is why they are leaving traditional media in droves, and piling onto search engine ad buys.

While it will take some time, it may be more cost effective for us to simply solidify our presence there (internet), and let the world catch up to us. Having pretty much relegated my TV to room divider status, I'm not entirely sure what the current status is on IPTV "cable" boxes, but doesn't Apple TV and such already give people a "non computer" means of accessing video, and I assume audio only, programming off the internet? And aren't there aggregators/portals already making the experience pretty analogous to old school cable box interfaces?

One advantage of focusing on gaining expertise in this emerging medium, is it allows, and will likely competitively require, production elements not available on traditional TV channels. Things like real time hyperlinks allowing viewers to click and get a popup screen showing studies / reports and such, that the show host is referring to. Meaning blatantly distorting facts and taking things out of context will be much harder than now. And allowing multiple commentators, even viewers, to run commentary on top of the same original video clip. Just imagine having the option of hearing The Southern Avenger "respond" to a piece by Hannity, with SA's response being only a click, or at most a search, away. This will make the old guard have to work a lot harder to retain their audience than now, as they can now rely simply on people having turned the dial to a given channel once, and then basically leaving it there. And it will make it much easier for "outsiders" to break in, as all it takes is making more sense to a given audience than what the "default "commentator does.

Not that I want to discourage attempting to gain a bigger presence in traditional broadcast media, but one of the lessons of RP's campaign, is that RP's ideas do best where the competition is hardest and most meritocratic. On internet sites with open comments, RP rules, as does his ideas at town halls and such, where everyone starts out somewhat "equal", and have to prove their mettle by making sense. In media and on platforms where "the chosen ones" can be "more equal" than others, we face much more of an uphill battle. But the beauty is, technology is inexorably moving bigger and bigger audiences towards the battlefields where we're strong, and away from the corrupt but declining fiefdoms of yesterday.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

RonPaulLincoln
It is lying to you! I do not have pay TV and never will again. The library and the internet are the places to go to find the truth. Not the spoon-fed propaganda spun on the boob tube. I will not pay to be lied to and I will not support the mechanism which the NWO wants to use to convince me I need fascism and world government.

I was thinking about this a couple of months ago. I need a way to educate my family without them knowing they are being educated. A liberty station would be kept on at all times in my house even if it was just background noise.

Free yourself.

a good concept but would be hard to pull since the TV networks are owned by a few higher ups. I am guessing the satellites and such are owned by the same networks.

i would subscribe to something like this though. ( and I work for the local cable company).