Can you imagine Ron Paul 2012?

0 votes

The level of support would be ridiculously high in my opinion. I hope it happens. What do you think?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, it's Ron's decision.

My only reservation, would be his age.

Other than that, it would probably revitalize the nation.

The military and the corporations own our government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4qUY9b3ETU

Well!

Half're on our side! The troops, at least...

Remember it's about education.

I think it would be a great opportunity.

I can imagine a rerun... and Ron not winning, again

definately, because we all know the game is rigged

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

"That's not gonna happen" - Stephanopolous


Granger, you are sadly correct. The game is rigged all right. Credit the CFR, and the 'made' guys who own the system, the media and can slant it anyway they like.

The only thing in Ron Paul's favor is that more people know about him than they did in 2007 and 2008. So that is a plus in our favor - maybe the only plus.

I feel this too, but more as a challenge

Life will present us with the same lessons until we learn them.

If enough people understand things like this, the "unmade majority" can become un-ignorable.

There needs to be an independent ballot counter. Persuade a few prominent actors to talk about it on some talk shows. Maybe get some source-forgers to code and implement it "live" so any online watchdog can oversee things. Maybe Google; they "can't do evil", and the majority already trusts them with absurdly more important things.

Just throwing ideas out there.. now's the time to start.

Independent ballot counter is how Nader got in the race

After the 1992 election, allot of inspectors for the registrar's office complained that Clinton had been named president when we had not opened the locked boxes. MSM apologied for "being excited and speaking too soon". But the cat so to speak was out of the bag because too many of us felt we had witnessed a coupe... so the only one willing to do anything was ralph Nader... he asked about a recount. They tell him that if he wants to count ballots he must be on the ballot.

And that's why Nader runs.

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

I'd like to make Stephanopolous eat his words.

I guess in a sense he has. Ron Paul has won.

Paul Craig Roberts


Would be a better choice. He knows how Washington works - probably better than Scott Ritter. But Ritter could be very useful in a Ron Paul administration.

And yet, PCRs steers clear of Ron Paul

Have you seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXz7F4DpAwc

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

Good


What's interesting is that there are so many bright, decent and capable people who would better serve the U.S. than those who have been elected.

This guy is good. Thanks.

This:

"If God himself got off his throne, descended from the heavens, trumpetted at my door, and announced that I was wasting my time trying to get Ron Paul into the Whitehouse, I would thank him for his concern and ask him to leave me to my business. I've wasted lots of time on far less noble causes..."

-RockEnds (Ron Paul Forums)

--------------
Regarding Palin: I believe we are watching in real time the rise of the third party, which will be controlled by the powers that be from its' inception.

Next Scam: "Cash For Cash"

http://www.RonPaul2012.com