Explain this

http://www.grupo.org/pentagon

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3606159506368831731#

even the grass was undisturbed.... you could putt on it....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C02dE5VKeck

Is that of the "C-ring" having been penetrated by a perfectly round hole.

How could an aircraft have punched through 6 walls, and all the interior columns to have left such a hole?

Independent Pursuit?

Come back and play...Did you watch the video?

Really good actors huh? Can you imagine the difficulty in getting all these people to agree to tell the same story and then have each of them pull off this academy award winning performance?

That's the reality I face. Do I trust a government and an administration that tried to thwart an investigation at every turn, won't release any video proof and then put together a 911 commission report, that some individuals who worked on, deemed a whitewash?

Or do I consider the eyewitness testimony, testimony that wasn't considered when putting the cover-up report together, by over a dozen highly believable witnesses.

Even Lloyd England, the cab driver that had a 250 lb., 30 foot long steel pole crash into his car at 500 miles per hour, straight through the windshield without leaving a scratch on his hood, he played the part of a liar flawlessly.

Like so many other things about this country and our government...I AIN'T BUYING IT NO MORE.

Do you even understand the ramifications of the government lying about the flight path of flight 77?

under your rock. We know a 757 did not hit the Pentagon. There were no engine impact markings on the building (and no the wings folding back and miraculously getting sucked into the hole won't work here) matter of fact the immediate photos show windows were not even broken where the wings should have hit. Have you seen the released frames from the Pentagon? All you see is a little streak of vapor,do you have any idea how big a 757 is?
.
.

Lousy try...oh yeah welcome to the DailyPaul.

The video trapfive (thanks) posted destroys any possibility of a 757 hitting that building within 4 minutes by the photo of the still standing center column where the jet was supposed to have passed through...your done with this issue now.
http://vimeo.com/4777716
.
.

http://www.ronpaulsingles.com/

Paper Ballots Hand Counted At The Precinct Or Bust
Support WTP Federal Supreme Court Case To Ban All Electronic Voting Or Forget 2010 or 2012
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2009-05-11...

I just looked up the same video description on google and what did I find?

Other people making the same connection... I wonder what they say.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ppfinal.html
http://www.nci.org/02NCI/01/back-27.htm

It's like totally spooky

I've got a long video (about an hour and a half) that looks credible to me.

http://vimeo.com/4777716

Of the 14 or so witnesses, including 3 Pentagon police, the pentagon heliport traffic controller, 4 Arlington cemetery workers, a mechanic, a Navy civilian contractor, you tell me....watch the video and explain how you know they are lying.

shoddy video... show the after...
F4 compared to a commercial passenger plane is like a bicycle and an 18wheeler. Titanium does not turn to dust from impacts.

engines:
The Rolls-Royce RB211 is a family of high-bypass turbofan engines made by Rolls-Royce plc and capable of generating 37,400 to 60,600 pounds-force (166 to 270 kilonewtons) thrust. Originally developed for the Lockheed L-1011 (TriStar), it entered service in 1972 and was the only engine to power this aircraft type.

2 engines About 9ft. long and 6 ft wide , weighing 7,294 lbs each
comprised of Titanium and Steel.... DO NOT turn to dust. Nor do they "leave no mark".

Also: 1 hour 39 min
try again, and next time bring better ammo

≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make
violent revolution inevitable."
John F. Kennedy

the difference between a jumbo jet and an old phantom are like night and day.

A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences. Proverbs 22:3

you should not study this in a vacuum. if you want to ask questions, ask also about the inconsistencies of the flight path reported and described in by the commission, which directly conflict multiple personal accounts of the trajectory as pointed out on film (on youtube) by independent researchers interviewing credible eye witnesses. ask about the aerodynamic capabilities of a passenger jet to maneuver the way it did to make its approach. ask about the complete blackout on any and all recordings of the incident opposed to the other prolific videos of the planes hitting the twin towers. Ask about the size of the parts that were scattered as debris not being nearly large enough to measure up to the pieces found on the size of plane which was reported to have crashed into the pentagon. (not to mention that immaculate lawn but thats something else altogether).

i do agree with you in fact that a plane would probably vaporize when hitting several cement and steel wall columns, but did the penetration go too far for it to plausably come from a passenger jet?

We all have questions man, none of us are going to ever get answers.

That plane was made out of different material,
Good people do Good deeds
Good people make it happen

A real investigation would satisfy us both perhaps.

I had to watch it 3 times.