Why the Attacks on J Street?

0 votes

Because they’re pro-peace, pro-American, and pro-Israel
( excerpted~please read in full)

The occasion of J Street’s first national conference, opening this week in Washington, has put the group at the center of a furious debate, one that often seems obscure to outsiders, i.e., non-Jews. After all, J Street’s agenda is no more radical than that advanced by every American president since Jimmy Carter: a two-state solution, peaceful coexistence between Israelis and Arabs, and the tamping down if not the elimination of a conflict that has become a major detriment to U.S. interests in the region. Yet the organization’s very existence has caused a brouhaha of major proportions among those for whom Israel is an issue both political and deeply personal.

The reason for this controversy is simple: for many years, the pro-Israel community has conflated support for Israel with support for the policies of its government. Back before the rise to power of such Israeli demagogues as Avigdor Lieberman, this was hardly ever a problem, though there were a few rough patches. The sentiments of the American people were largely, almost reflexively pro-Israel, and the efforts of its government to ensure security in the face of what seemed from a distance to be a uniformly fanatical and violent Palestinian underground evoked much sympathy in the West.

More to the point, American Jews were not noticeably conflicted in their loyalty to the Zionist cause, which had started out as a liberal/progressive crusade for national self-determination. As the power equation changed, however, and the unchallenged military and economic might of the Jewish state made it virtually unassailable by its Arab neighbors, the tide of public – and Jewish – opinion began to turn.

Growing revulsion on the part of many if not most American Jews against the reckless militarism and moral vacuity of Israeli government policies peaked during the recent Gaza "incursion," in which thousands of defenseless Palestinians were killed and maimed [.pdf] – and the government seemed to glory in its own savagery. This, following on the heels of yet another invasion of Lebanon, in which civilian targets such as churches, hospitals, and water facilities were bombed, was too much for many of Israel’s American supporters to swallow. J Street was born out of a desire to provide an alternative to the view that support for Israel has to mean – by definition – support for the policies of the Israeli government.

read in full
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/10/25/why-the-attack...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Anyone else have an opinion?

...

I remain hopeful....but wary

There are many American and Israeli Jews that do not agree with the current policies of Israel. Their efforts are not reported in our media so most Americans do not realize it. I hope J-Street is a sincere organization to help promote peace in the middle east but I remain wary at this point.

Against Occupation: Voices within Israel and the Diaspora
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/111219#comment-1210752

***************
"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd

"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd

There are grounded reasons to be suspicious...

If you look back at the Israeli lobby's history, you will see that its roots started off as the AZC (American Zionist Council). However, due to Senator Fulbright's aggressive stance against them, they had no choice but to transferred all their interests to new lobby front- AIPAC. During the time of the AZC, there was lots of controversy due to its strong ties to Israel and alleged bribes, espionage, and back channel funding it received from the Israeli government. Thanks to Adam Feinberg funding the Kennedy campaign, the state/justice departments agreed not to inspect its books and only a superficial scan of its overt activities. Once the AZC was deemed as a foreign agent, it was very easy to transfer all its interests to AIPAC since the state/justice departments would never investigate. Yet, the same activities that occurred with the AZC is occurring now with AIPAC and there is a LOT of backlash- deservedly so! It makes me wonder if this is another attempt to transfer AIPAC interests into a new lobby front- J street PAC. One cannot help to feel suspicious given the lobby's history in this country.

Bump for others

to read.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.