Read the bills? How about reading the Constitution Congress?

0 votes

Great article by Gene Healy of the Cato Institute...

You can live in this town for years and still occasionally find yourself gobsmacked by what counts as "normal" by Washington standards. Take the ongoing debate over whether it's fair for us to expect our elected representatives to read the laws they pass and expect us to follow.
Recently, Sen. Thomas Carper, D-DE, and Rep. John Conyers, D-MI, scoffed at the idea that they should read the health care legislation working its way through Congress (hey, it's only a matter of life and death). That attitude has inspired the "Read to Vote" campaign--designed to get congressmen to pledge to "read every word of every bill before casting my vote."
Read to Vote's efforts earned them a condescending Washington Post editorial last month, complaining that their proposal "would bring government to a standstill." (Heaven forbid.) "To read all 1,427 pages of Waxman-Markey," the Post fretted, "it would take at least 12 hours -- tough on a tight legislative timeline."
Is reading the cap and trade bill tough? Tough. If you're planning to regulate every industrial process in America, you may have to do some heavy slogging.
True enough, the bills Congress passes have become increasingly impenetrable over the years. In Abraham Lincoln's first State of the Union, he worried about the growing complexity of federal law, but noted that, with a modest effort at revision, "all the acts of Congress now in force [could fit in] one or two volumes of ordinary and convenient size." Today, the Senate Finance Committee's 1,502-page health-care bill would take up more than that much space by itself.
Worse still, most of the actual "law" in this country--the rules that citizens have to follow, at pain of fine or imprisonment--is generated by unelected administrative agencies, which use broad authority delegated by Congress to add over 75,000 new pages to the Federal Register every year.
It's said that the Roman emperor Caligula posted new laws high on the columns of buildings so citizens couldn't read them and figure out how to avoid their penalties. He could have achieved the same effect by covering the country with such a dense thicket of rules that no one could tell what the law commands.
Legend has it that Caligula also made his favorite horse a senator. Considering how lightly most of our legislators take their constitutional obligations, you could probably do worse.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Read-the-b...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is why I wonder

how can we expect to vote our way out of this? We have some WONDERFUL folks stepping up, I don't mean to take away from their dedication, but we REALLY need a better plan. I was pulling for the CC2009, but things do not look good for it either. Unless folks are holding out for a bloody revolt, I suggest we get serious about boycotting banks. If we gave them nearly a 100% default rate and no one applying for loans (and a squatter in every property) then we can get to the heart of the problem. Expecting 1..a clean election to 2. produce a majority of 3. educated, 4. conservative, and 5. honest politicians is quite the wish list.
We need a nice peaceful action that everyone can participate in. Maybe this one for now:
http://www.taxfree15th.com/

Until people decide to go for the "Squatter's Rebellion" idea. ;)

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.