♠ Richard Dreyfuss on 9/11

http://www.jfgv.com/page.aspx?id=136053

describing Dreyfuss' speech at the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver,
might be a clue:

http://www.jfgv.com/page.aspx?id=136053

!

http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com
http://2ndtuesdayconstitutiongroup.com

Sigh......Why bring up JFK and then question him about if he knows what started the Civil War? Stay on topic...9/11....that's it. I think 9/11 was an inside job but I just cringe when I see people with cameras interviewing the likes of Dryfuss and others and they start talking about JFK, UFO's, the MOON, etc, etc, etc..........SHUT UP about that other stuff. Relating it to 9/11 doesn't do ANY good what so ever. Say your peice about 911 and move along. And for the rest of you bashing Dryfuss.........I don't think what he said was bad at all. Even though I think 9/11 was an inside job from my perspective the one with the screw loose was the one asking the questions. Dryfuss didn't say he wasn't for an investigation at all.........his point is that people can't handle it emotionally...........I agree with him.........people can't handle the truth. With a lot of things........not just with 911. People reading this can't handle the truth about a lot of things in their lives. They can't handle the truth about how fat they are, how out of shape they are how unsucessful they are....it goes on and on and on. He's got a point and it has nothing to do with him being too scared. Even though I agree with him that people can't handle the truth I disagree with him that there does need to be an investigation. I for one care not what people can handle or not. I want the truth....if you can't handle the truth.........TUFF S*&$.

conclusion would be more smoke and mirrors.
Why bother? Why dont we start with setting the record straight to all Americans that their news is filtered more than communist China's??

That the CFR and AIPAC have bought over 90+% of their elected officials?

Let's work on lifting that veil first and then maybe we can work our way toward 9/11.

brought to justice and executed and/or imprisoned for their crimes, I would. I am for a new independent investigation.
Having said that, I feel the need to defend Mr Dreyfuss here. I commend him for having a strong, thought-out position on the matter. Though I may not agree as he seems to be acknowledging that the official story is not correct and that the truth may very well cause another civil war, that emotions are still too high. He feels we should wait one generation. I disagree. I feel that a generation of reacting to a lie will destroy America. He essentially feels that its expedient that those guilty should escape justice lest a worse thing happen. I disagree because much of who America is today is a direct response to the belief in a false reality. If the truth were made known, we would be forced to adjust to the new reality- which may very well change the public's opinion regarding not only the wars in the Middle East but nearly every facet of government involvement in our lives today.At least Mr Dreyfuss has given it a lot of thought- and I respect that. We need to embrace thinking people (especially if we disagree with them)- these are the ones we want to debate with. It would be unfortunate if he received a bunch of hate mail- it would only reinforce his flawed opinion.

the arrogant never listen, they know everything... or so they think.

Talking to him would be a close encounter of the "worst" kind. Balance your meds? Yes, medicate yourself and everything will be oooookaay.
Condescending dolt.

Richard Gage from AE911 should met with him.

Richard Dreyfuss - washed up actor. Who cares?

I'm not saying everyone on the CFR is bad or in the know, but I'm just saying... (I remember his name and a few others in the entertainment industry being on the list of CFR members and I recall thinking that was interesting...)

I'll watch the video later to see what he says....

People are so quick NOT to hear. I didn't understand the point he was trying to make and his comparison to the Lincoln Memorial and the well-being of future generations??? What emotions and whose emotions is he talking about? Seeking...no, I mean defining truth or justice, is obviously not the pursuit of a suppliant.

This should come as good news to any overburdened police department. 8/

wait for another generation?
are you kidding me?
at the rate we're going there isn't going to be another
generation to consider another investigation.

no more dickie dreyfuss movies for me.

Ron Paul is my President

.

would anybody ask Richard Dufuss his opinion on this anyway?? Who cares what he thinks about that?

--------
We don't know how to mind our own business
'Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us
Now we are fighting a war over there
No matter who's the winner
We can't pay the cost
'Cause there's a monster on the loose

Let's wait 40 years. by then we will have no say in government or investigating anything.
Forgive him ... he belongs to the 'I've got mine' club

Don´t bash this guy because he does not agree.
I am all for a new investigation but I believe also that you need to get free minded people to do it that have no strings attached, otherwise we will be on square one again and I think that is what he ment, people who will be pointed to do a new investigation will all be controlled, or the majority of them atleast.

What a jerk. Don't look into the worst atrocity that has ever, ever hit America because people are "emotional." What kind of argument is that?
I'm trying just to understand that argument on any level. What in the world does "too emotional" have to do with it???? Don't look into it for a generation--oh, yeh, the GUILTY would really, really appreciate that!!!!