Go VOTE in this NPR poll: Obama v. Fox. We are winning but need to make it a runaway!

I don't think so

The mainstream media doesn't have a channel for us, yet.

They are designed for the ignorant sleeping masses to allow them to feel as if they have an opinion or control. It is a waste of our time.

**************************************************
Only as a free man shall I perish...

After Sean Hannity's trashing of Dr. Paul, and the entire network marginalizing him? I no longer have cable, and don't want it back any time soon. Fox, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, who needs any of them? I've gotten my headlines from Drudge since 2001, tell me again why you think Fox News is so important? Just because they're 'the network of 9/12ers'? Just thought I'd put my two cents in, this is a total waste of time.

Debra Medina for Texas Governor 2010!

Rand Paul for US Senate in Kentucky!

Ron Paul 2012, Join or Die!

DONT TREAD ON ME

AN APPEAL TO HEAVEN - WASHINGTON'S CRUISERS

The White House on this one; Fox News isn't "fair and balanced." 38% (161,769 votes)
Fox News on this one; it asks questions others don't and the White House should be able to handle them. 61% (261,540 votes)
Neither side. They're both trying to play this "feud" to their advantage. 2% (7,626 votes)
Total Votes: 430,935

Faux News or do you have a mouse in your pocket...I am never to be considered a "WE" with faux news. The obvious answer is number 3.

"Fox News on this one; it asks questions others don't and the White House should be able to handle them."

I voted this way even though the three possible selections are pretty lame, and indirect:

"the White House should be able to handle them.". Why did they add this? The controversial aspects of what fox covers, that the white house will not respond to, are not aspects to be "handled", unless they are making a reference to the Italian mobs ole way of "handling business".

Of course they can't "handle" the questions, and allegations. The only way to "handle" it, would be to admit to an unethical campaign, and presidency.

They are both playing this for gain.

Obama wins over his ring-kissers
Fox wins over it's hypnotized viewers.

Besides.."The News" is supposed to report it, not become it.

I did support the other networks walking out when fox was singled out of the press pool. Because they are all bad apples.

I voted #3 "Theyre both shit"

Obama is actually correct. Faux news is not news. if they were news then they wouldnt have been reading white house scripts on air for the last 8 years.

They're both losers.

has been using better language lately, I am tremendously suspicious of them and their Palin love. To them she is a libertarian, utterly ridiculous. They did bring in Stossel which was a very good move, but their audience will reject most of his ideas as too radical. Even if fox wanted to move in the right direction, they are dragging a huge ball and chain called "their audience" and until American largely reject liberal republicans fox will be handicapped in supporting liberty. At least they are giving a voice to it though. I voted neither at this point, although I was horribly in the minority.

"In the capitalist society there is a place and bread for all. Its ability to expand provides sustenance for every worker. Permanent unemployment is not a feature of free capitalism." - Mises - www.mises.org

But I am defending their rights to equal access and freedom of speech. Vote for that!

Healthnut4freedom

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct thy paths." Proverbs 3:5,6

biased toward Obama NPR usually is, it's encouraging to see its poll tilting away from approval of the Administration's targeting of FOX (whether you like FOX is not the point; singling out its bias for censure and approving only the bias for Obama is dangerous in the same way the blackout of RP was dangerous during the campaign.

And I've got to vote?

Already lost