The winner of the 2009 elections is: Ron Paul!

0 votes

Forget the spin and the slop. The real winner of the 2009 elections is the public official and candidate who has championed the core insurgency driving the election. It is Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul.

Paul embodies the anti-Washington, anti-tax, anti-big government, anti-financial insiderism viewpoints that are galvanizing large numbers of activists and voters. It is not a majority, but a majority has never been Ron Paul's goal. Paul is a conviction politician, an idea man, an advocate and a change agent.

The Democratic spin is that the Republicans have moved much too far to the right. This is true in a sense. But remember, Democratic smarties said the same thing before Ronald Reagan was elected and before Newt and Republicans won in 1994.

I agree with some things Paul says, and disagree with others, but the truth of the matter, politically, is that his agenda has moved center stage and his people are highly motivated and this is a serious movement that is underestimated and misunderstood by Washington insiders.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/lawmaker-news/66039-th...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What a wonderful uplifting article after the election!!

THANK YOU

WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")

I agree. He won hands down. He was able to do more for this

country by NOT being president than probably if he had been. The Obama people weren't ready yet. So many are now and there will be many more in the next year.

If he ran again, he would have to win on just popularity alone not to mention principle!!!!

http://therootsofchange.com