RJ Harris: The Way Forward in the War on Terror

0 votes

by RJ Harris | December 3, 2009

A Congressional Candidates Response to the Afghanistan Surge of 2009

Somewhere between the events of 911 and the President's Afghanistan "surge speech" we seem to have forgotten that what distinguishes us from the terrorists trying to kill us is our commitment to the rule of law. Terrorists and pirates care nothing about safeguarding individual liberty or fundamental human rights, but we do. Our commitment to these principles is what makes us human and free and makes the terrorists and pirates enemies of humanity. This commitment requires us to provide due process and equal protection to all persons, not only citizens, within our Republic's jurisdiction regardless of where they were captured or where they are currently held. (14th Amendment) To meet this due process requirement, and to classify enemy combatants, terrorist or pirates as prisoners of war, requires; 1. notice; 2. an opportunity to be heard. For soldiers of a foreign sovereign to have the required notice requires a formal declaration of war issued by our Congress. Article I section 8 of the Constitution limits this power to only the Congress. This power cannot be delegated to the President by way of Authorization for the Use of Force Resolutions, as was done in Iraq and Afghanistan, because the President would then be able to commit acts of war without a war being first properly declared. The President may defend the lives, liberty and property of U.S. Citizens while eminent threats remain but to go on offense requires a proper congressional war declaration.

For suspected international terrorists or pirates to have the notice required under due process requires that Letters of Reprisals (declarations of war upon stateless actors and activities) be issued against them by Congress and for Congress to have defined and set the punishments for piracies and offences against the law of Nations. (Article I Section 8) To date, no Letters of Reprisal have been issued against ANY terrorist organization or activity. For all of the persons herein mentioned, an opportunity to be heard is provided when the above formalities have taken place, before or during the outbreak of hostilities, thereby allowing these persons to be classified as prisoners of war, held under military authority and tried in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Considering then our commitment to the rule of law, the way forward in the War on Terror is clear. First, we must withdraw conventional occupation forces from any sovereign that has not had a congressional declaration of War issued against it or Letters of Reprisal issued against terrorist groups harbored therein. Second, those foreign groups and individuals that have in the past and continue to this day to use violence to infringe upon the lives, liberty or property of Americans must have Letters of Reprisal issued against them so that they can be killed or captured legally. Third, those that are then captured must be treated as prisoners of war and be housed in military prisons until they can receive fair trials and just punishments in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice. And finally, we must use our superior force projection capabilities, Letters of Marque (bounties) and diplomatic contacts to interdict those with Letters of Reprisal levied against them as they attempt to travel and or congregate.

Given the government's current commitment to expanding our military presence in Afghanistan as outlined by the President's speech Tuesday last, I am calling upon my future colleagues in the Congress to remember our commitment to the rule of law by immediately voting on resolutions to secure Letters of Reprisal against Al Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan and to define and set the punishments for international terrorism and piracy. To do otherwise is to turn the courage, honor and valor of our veterans into instruments of lawlessness and unconstitutionality. Such is the size and scope of our legal errors prosecuting the War on Terror up till now that they are nearly insurmountable. But if we will return to our founding principles, codified in the Constitution, the Spirit of the Founders will light our way.

FOR LIBERTY!

RJ Harris
Norman, OK
OK Dist4 Congressional Candidate
Constitutional Conservative Republican

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

uniform code of military justice IS NOT uniform

We should all be equal under the law, or there should be no law at all. If there are a set of laws for only a class of Americans, in this instance, the military, then mayhaps we should abandon completely the federal laws that apply to the ordinary citizen.

In this society, the military is the government, but do we want the government to be the military. With state approval we are enshrining perhaps a military aristocracy.

Laws administered by a group of people within their ranks would be only suitable if there was no central government to socialize its justice.

We need to build political strength and political will.

But it is required by the Constitution...

The UCMJ is administered by Congresses authority--civilian authority. It was promulgated under several clauses that fall within Article I section 8 of the Constitution which requires Congress to train, regulate and discipline the military. Several Clauses within this same Article requires Congress to provide due process for enemy combatants as well as pirates and terrorists…all of which is contained, and if it is not it should be, within the UCMJ. The UCMJ is not THE law, it is part of the law and the support for its existence is the Constitution. If it did not exist, the Congress would be in violation of their duty on this issue.

RJ Harris

RJ Harris
Constitutional Libertarian
www.harrisforoklahoma.com

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/RJ-Harris/128692249103

RJ

needs to DEFINE Terrorists. When is an individual allowed to use self defense against US aggression in THEIR country or rouge private contractors/soldiers and who decides their reaction makes them a "terrorist"?

The constitutional definition of a Terrorist:

The constitutional definition of a Terrorist (yes there were terrorists in our founders day:) are those who commit "Offences against the Law of Nations…" (Article I Section 8) Herein Congress has been granted the power to determine whether an actor is a lawful enemy combatant or a pirate/terrorist and to set the punishments for those deemed to be a pirate/terrorist. Congress may not establish "punishments" for lawful enemy combatants, that power is reserved to the Law of Nations. Precedentially, terrorists and pirates are stateless actors that use violence to infringe upon the lives, liberty, property or commerce of civilians.

The Law of Nations makes provisions for organized militias who are attempting to defend the lives, liberty, commerce and/or civilian territory (property) under the militias control. Organized tribal militias trying to defend territory not under the political control of the Afghanistan government should be found to be lawful enemy combatants and granted the full protections of the Law of Nations. Foreign fighters, drawn to the regional conflict for political reasons and not under the control of any recognized authority--state, tribal or other--are the most likely candidates for the terrorist sanction.

RJ Harris

RJ Harris
Constitutional Libertarian
www.harrisforoklahoma.com

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/RJ-Harris/128692249103

So all

we have to do is keep killing the locals until the only ones left are the boys jumping the border to help their neighbors. Do you really consider these folks terrorists? Will we prosecute private security contractors that terrorize the local populations as "Terrorists"?

a bump for more to read

.

Let's have a mini bomb for

Let's have a mini bomb for RJ. This guy needs funds and we need to help him raise them!

www.rjharris2010.com

What 'War on Terror'?

And what 'rule of law'?

What use is a plan when it begins with two false premises. There is no so-called 'War on Terror' and there is no real 'rule of law'.

Sure, we have to suffer the consequences if we don't buckle our seat belt, or fail to use our turn signal, or pay our taxes. If that's your meaning of the 'rule of law' that separates us from the terrorist, then you are probably right.

America has been kidnapping, torturing, murdering, staging coups, covertly and openly engaging in wars with bombing we lovingly call 'shock and awe', carpet bombing, drone attacks, etc. Where is the 'rule of law'?

Was it the intel from hamburger flipper 'Curveball', or the forged Yellowcake documents, or the cartoon drawings presented by Colin Powell, or Alberto Gonzales legalization of torture, or the destruction of the video tapes of that torture after being ordered secure by a court of law, or the fairy tales of Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman, or the telecom companies violating our rights, or the Government giving those same telecom companies retroactive immunity for violating our rights, or the 'natural born' POTUS whose father was a Kenyan citizen that makes you think we are under the 'rule of law'? There is no punishment, at most there is a hearing or a probe that dead ends.

But God help you if you don't fasten your seat belt or change lanes without using your blinker, because the Government is definitely a believer in
the 'rule of law'.

Ah traffic court...

The absurdity that people are killing in my name people that have and will never do any harm to me. If one of us were to miss a court date here we are sent to jail like a common criminal. Its interesting how the use of force is used so violently against people doing the best they can to stay in line while we have a rouge country breaking the most obvious of laws with impunity.

Watch over 500 Activist-Issue Films Online, www.filmsforaction.org

www.youthforronpaul.com
www.yaliberty.org - Young Americans for Liberty
www.ivaw.org/operation-recovery - Stop Deploying Traumatized Troops

If this man is not elected to Congress...

it will be a travesty.

Ron Paul 2012 for Peace

Ron Paul 2012 for Peace

Read this everyone! R.J hit another

one absolutely out of the sinkhole of confusion into the realm of logic and ethical policy. R.J., I hope your future constituents can see your value. Please keep writing and speaking and educating!

Brilliant

Spread this far and wide.