1 vote

Abolish the 14th Amendment Campaign:We need to educate our elected officials, just like we did on the Federal Reserve!

After watching the video series brought forth today on another thread, it reminded me of the video I posted here a few months back by Bruce Ray Riggs .... http://www.dirtyunclesam.com

This is the 'root' of all our problems, and if we can start pushing this in the face of anyone who wants our support for money bombs etc, and bring it to their attention, maybe we can get some momentum in the right direction. The problem is, most of our elected officials have absolutely no idea about the 14th Amendment, so we need to educate them, and put some heat on them, to address this.

We can do this, if we all get on the same page, and perhaps start a new campaign, that puts this in the face of every elected official we have.

Ask them what 'they' are willing to do about the information now provided to them, and if they won't address, we simply won't recognize them, or better yet, we'll expose them for the traitors they are! We'll put so much heat on them, that they will have to acknowledge the fact that we know about the 14 th Amendment citizen, and we want OUT!

Just like we put the heat on our Congressman and Senators to sign up on 1207, we can put the heat on them to sign up on this. Maybe we can get one of them (Dr.Paul? or someone else) to bring a bill to abolish the 14 th Amendment, if we start putting the heat on them on a daily basis.

None of them knew jack shit about the Federal Reserve, and look what happened after they become educated on the subject.

Imagine what could happen if they were to become educated on the 14 th Amendment.

What do you guys think?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wait. What?

Why would you do that? It's the basis for applying the Bill of Rights to the states.

If you're concerned about the debt ceiling, then just push for a new amendment that clarifies that issue.

+ Follow the Cooperative principle
+ Civility first
+ Constructive comments

Under the 14th Amendment, the

Under the 14th Amendment, the States were abolished. They are now mere districts of the Federal Government. There is the STATE, Federal Government, and the DISTRICTS (which we still refer to as "States").

State: A political body, or body politic; the whole body of people united under one government, whatever may be the form of the government.

Prior to the 14th Amendment there were 38 States, 38 Independent body politics. The 14th Amendment created one body politic, one STATE. The previous independent States, although still referred to as States, by default they became districts of THE STATE. This is evidenced by the fact that all of these States were required to implement within their Constitutions that ONLY UNITED STATES CITIZENS can serve in public office. This creates the situation where the previous INDEPENDENT STATE GOVERNMENTS formed of Citizens of THAT INDEPENDENT STATE, are now occupied by UNITED STATES CITIZENS, Federal citizens, not citizens of the Independent States. Whereas these State officials previously held a superior allegiance to the Independent State, now under the 14th Amendment Citizenship their superior allegiance is first to THE STATE, the Federal State, and THEN a secondary and subordinate allegiance to their DISTRICT, referred to as "State of ___________". It is as if we invaded Mexico, and then forced them to write within their constitution "Only citizens of the United States may serve in public office. Anyone wishing to vote in elections for these officials must be a United States citizen. Any Mexican citizen shall not be allowed to vote, but may allowed to become a United States citizen by registering to vote". Certainly it would be clear to the people of Mexico that they were now under the Jurisdiction of the United States, not Mexico. This is EXACTLY what happened in these Independent States of the united States of America in 1867.

It is NOT the basis for applying the Bill of Rights to the States, it is the basis for allowing THE STATE, Federal State, the decision on WHICH "rights" (privileges) they want to allow THEIR citizens, just as it was with the Independent States prior to the 14th Amendment.

Do you have the "right" to carry a concealed weapon in your "State"? Does your state make you get a permit for such? Can you carry a fully auto weapon? THE STATE has not outlawed most weapons, but your State may have. The United State does not prohibit its citizens from carrying concealed weapons, but it does not prevent the Districts from prohibiting concealed weapons. So your District (State) may not allow such, and the Federal Government does not stop them from this. On the other hand, The United State DOES NOT allow its citizens to own fully automatic weapons without obtaining a special permit, and the Districts cannot override this statute the applies to UNITED STATE CITIZENS. The same goes for any statute The UNITED STATE makes for ITS citizens. The Districts can make any statute for The United State citizens, but The United State can come in and say NO, we, The United State, ALLOW our citizens such, thereby nullifying the Districts statute in that instance.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

???

“The right of trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment (Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 US 90), and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment (Presser v. Illinois, 116 US 252), have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by the States, and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment by grand jury, contained in the Fifth Amendment (Hurtado v. California, 110 US 516), and in respect of the right to be confronted with witness is, contained in the Sixth Amendment. West v. Louisiana, 194 US 258. In Maxwell v. Dow, supra, where the plaintiff in error had been convicted in a state court of a felony upon information and by a jury of eight persons, it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the Fifth Amendment, and the trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the Fourteenth Amendment… the decision rested upon the ground that this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not forbid the States to abridge the personal rights enumerated in the first eight Amendments, because these rights were not within the meaning of the clause ‘privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States.’ …We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by the States…

“…it is possible that some of the personal rights safeguarded by the first eight Amendments against National action may also be safeguarded against State action, because a denial of them would be a denial of due process of law… If this is so, it is not because those rights are enumerated in the first eight Amendments, but because they are of such a nature that they are included in the conception of due process of law.”

(Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 98-99, 29 S.Ct. 14, 53 L.Ed. 97.)

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

The rot already set in when

The rot already set in when the plotters in Philadelphia overthrew our far superior first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, and replaced it with the centralist document which now governs us. Bring back the Articles! I'd sign on to that campaign in a heartbeat.

Yes, no doubt, if people

Yes, no doubt, if people would have picked this up and ran with it in 2009 and advanced THIS ISSUE to the extent that the Federal Reserve issue has been advanced...we would likely be seeing a REAL revolution by now.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

Bump, bump, bump...

Get back to the Constitution!...

Assert Your Authority

Assert Your Authority