0 votes

So how much more freedom are we going to lose because of this bogus Detroit airplane terrorist thing?

Man, I bet the neo-con parasites (ie. Bolton, O'Reilly, etc) are loving this.
I just had the TV on Greta Van Susteren (Fox News). All she was showing was about this stupid incident.
ps. Great to have the DP back up !




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rest assured...there are hundreds of people "on the edge" in the

Detroit area now.

Discover Costa Rica

photoshopwiz's picture

from an ally site:

"We, the greatest nation on earth, are supposed to be Collectively Freaked Out because some sad little geek couldn’t make his [effen] underpants explode properly? ... "

Late Night: So Let Me Get This Straight…
http://firedoglake.com/2009/12/26/late-night-so-let-me-get-t...

According to CNN...

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TRAVEL/12/26/us.passenger.restrictions/

"Measures will include increased pat-downs and gate screening, as well as having to stow carry-ons and personal items, including pillows."

"remain in their seats with their seat belts fastened and couldn't have any items, such as pillows or blankets, covering their laps; everything was stowed away."

""They X-rayed the milk I don't know how many times," "

Our own worst enemy is offensive statements like ...

..."bogus...terrorist thing"

I don't want to lose another ounce of liberty. I'm with you on that. But you're a saboteur, whether you like it or not.

We don't know that it was bogus. We're not omniscient beings. And, in the eyes of the public - the very public we need to begin to move in our direction if we want to roll back government - it was a legitimate attempted attack.

When we say idiotic things like calling the attack "bogus" or going off into a tangent about the NWO or the Bilderbergs, we just push people away.

Protections for anonymous speech are vital to democratic discourse. Allowing dissenters to shield their identities frees them to express critical, minority views...Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. - SCotUS, 1995

This is only the beginning........

Wait until the next major "False Flag" operation. You think we have few civil liberties left now? Another false flag operation will be their (NWO,Neo-Cons, Illuminati,etc.) Rosetta Stone. Their excuse to implement Martial Law (Executive Orders 1-100,000). A new yet Draconian way of life. God Help Us!

Also, is it just me or is the Yemen connection a little odd?

I remember reading just last week on Anti-war.com that Obama just started doing some military operations in Yemen...and now this patsy has links to Yemen. That seems a little to convenient to me. Methinks the establishment is working on establishing some pre-text for something to do with Yemen.

Yemen

Dr. Paul talks about Yemen on this post 4 days ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GVuJxbHPzI&feature=sub

Obama = O.ne B.ig A.ss M.istake A.merica

Yep !

A little kid brought a "Popper" on board and he is now a terrorist.I could have done the same thing with a can of shaving cream but it wouldn't have been as loud !

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

It started out as a firecracker.

The next day it was a major terrorist attack. Need I say more?

Yes, that's what I noticed

Kurt Nimmo saying in his infowars article--that witnesses saw a firecracker...and now the establishment ilk is telling us that it was a bomb or something. What a bunch of neo-con scum.

Apparently, all the security

Apparently, all the security they have so far "post 9/11 (inside job)" didn't do anything to stop the exact same explosive supposedly used by the infamous shoe bomber.. so, what exactly are they spending all that money on?

|^^^^^^^^^^^\||____ San Luis Obispo, CA
| RON PAUL 2012 |||""'|""\___,
| _____________ l||__|__|__|); Freedom 101
|(@)@)"""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)

Agreed -

it's totally ridiculous. Terrorism on planes has ALWAYS been a possibility, and pretty sure ALL fliers/passengers are aware of the risk when they decide to travel by plane. Just another reason for them to take away more liberties, like the 9-11 acts.

Obama = O.ne B.ig A.ss M.istake A.merica

Yup

Just allow pilots to be armed. 95% of potential problems would be solved imo.

Yes, pilots should have

Yes, pilots should have access to firearms for protection, but what good is a gun against an explosive device hidden on a passenger?