Why is Sarah Palin associated with Tea Parties?

hi-jacks the light, study the French and Russian revolutions, the exact same thing is happening again we must not allow it!

http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/Th...

The real Tea Parties (that is, Ron Paul conservative) were hijacked to an extent by the neocons. That is why the likes of Sarah Palin are *now* involved with them.

The neocons actually think they can reabsorb Ron Paulers back into their fold. That is why Glenn Beck, the NYT, etc. keep parroting messages/movements that come from the Revolution (e.g., End the Fed).

But we will never be reabsorbed again...not after seeing a real conservative get so close to the Presidency.

Instead, we try to use the Tea Parties to convert well-meaning Republican voters to assert their desire to replace fake conservative leaders with real conservative leaders.

The interesting thing was how the original Tea Party was fairly staged to blow off some steam of free-thinkers. It was meant to dissuade people from starting a revolution. However, the importance of that event actually ignited the American Revolution.

Although the current Tea Parties were not staged, the attempt to hijack it has actually made it easier to get access to confused conservatives. Again, this can become a real catalyst for us.

The neocons think they have one-up'd us by hijacking our message, but really they are adding fuel to the fire. We need only get people to really want true conservative leadership.

They further dilute both the "conservative" and "Republican" labels. The traditional GOP is in its "death throws," and "Ron Paul liberty candidates" will become a dominant force in American politics.

Anyone who knows me knows I'm anything but an optimist.
However, that is my prediction.

Most of those people probably voted for mr. bush, and the majority of those who did probably, in retrospect, would do it again and will vote for Jeb in 2012. I have a feeling that many of those people would not be showing up to any protests if mr. mccain was the president right now.

them "throw the rascals out" of DC, as Carroll Quigley once wrote.

And as such, support the two on-going wars.

Calling Palin a neocon just makes her more popular with them.

Is not Freedom Works the group behind the 'Tea Party Patriots'?

In his last legislative effort, Armey was named chairman of the House Select Committee on Homeland Security and was the primary sponsor of the legislation that created the Department of Homeland Security.

At the start of 2003, Armey joined the Washington office of the law firm DLA Piper (formerly DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary) as a senior policy advisor. Armey was also the firm's co-chairman of its Homeland Security Task Force.

How many law firms have their own Homeland Security Taskforce?

Is Homeland Insecurity involved in the co-opt of the 'Tea Parties'?

Dick Armey was a senior policy adviser for DC-based lobbying firm DLA Piper, whose recent and/or current clients include "pharmaceutical maker Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, ... health care provider Metropolitan Health Networks, and the pharmaceutical firm Medicines Company," all entities that might benefit financially from seeing health care reform defeated.

Dick Armey's concurrent posts with both FreedomWorks and DLA Piper became particularly controversial in light of the $1,290,000 DLA Piper received in 2009 from the pharmaceutical company Medicines Co.

Link

And Fox News said Rudy was a front runner in 2008.

And they said that McCain was a true conservative because he is pro-WAR anywhere and everywhere.

If you aren't chanting WAR you are a liberal according to Fox News.

Funny thing is it was a bunch of anti-war pro-military people who gave Ron Paul the largest one day fundraising tea-party in history.

Sarah is their answer to replace Dr. Paul as head of the teaparty with SOB/scum sucker Glenn Beck ranting as the mouthpiece of the disgruntled.

Mark my words...

In 1980 we were given Reagan (Liberty) Vs. Bush (NEO-CON) because Goldwater was unacceptable to the establishment.

This time around the establishment is set against Ron Paul; so they are graciously going to give you a choice between Palin (Liberty) and Romney (Harvard NEO-CON).

The problem is that like Reagan, Palin will preach liberty and once in office she will be a big spending establishment NEO-CON.

She bent over for McCain and she will do it again for a promotion from the establishment in 2012.

But unlike Reagan I think Palin is content to bend over for Romney and settle for his vice prez.

I believe it is an attempt to take over the Tea Parties by the Republican Party (New World Order crowd). Palin did run with John McInsane.

testing her for 2012. Trying to figure out if they can "float her by" to satisfy populist anger.

I almost feel sorry for the PTB... they just don't get it. They think we're stupid enough to buy that- we're not.

Because she's such a bag.

If enough people are seen to be independent for the next Presidential election, they will have someone to stick in there.

Rogue indeed...lol

her porn star look a like?

Cause she doesn't like coffee ?

Or...

She wants to make new friends ?

or maybe...

She's been instructed to do it ?

Any other ideas.