Help elect Scott Brown

While I can understand wanting another Kennedy to fill a Massachusetts senate seat(just kidding, i meant a liberty candidate), is it wrong to at least ASK whether being pragmatic and ending the 60 seat supermajority 1 year sooner is better then voting your conscience on a candidate who I haven't seen a lot of support for on here? And on that note, have there been any money bombs or a lot of great(any) front page write ups on JK here?

Similar to focus remaining on hr1207 when the Christmas Eve vote was scheduled for obama care, it doesnt seem like JK(yes, the irony of the initials) got much attention diverted his way with his election approaching and the others a year off. Yet for all that fabulous effort, we are to ridicule a someone who thinks ending the filibuster-proof supermajority a year early, and at least giving us a chance to make it to the next elections without healthcare passing is a worthy compromise?

Sure, Brown supports the war and some other things I might not care for, but his 1 vote on those handful of things would be considered far less important than the ability it break the supermajority a year early by some patriots.

It seems as though even on DP people would rather not have to make tough decisions. I guess that is part of human nature. However, it is of my opinion that those who are making this out to be a no-brainer may be doing so because they are experiencing cognitive-atrophy and dont want to think or see others discuss such issues. I would have preferred to have seen this topic discussed a bit, and seen JK promoted to be more than the guy who could potentially keep the supermajority in tact.

I realize I am in for some flaming because this may have indirectly indicted some folks and they may take it personally, but that was not my intent. I simply thought this topic deserved a bit more thought and discussion than the usual marching in step some of the people who have all the obvious answers prefer practicing. Is there anyone who agrees this was an issue at least worth consideration?

I'm hoping the voters that don't pay attention go in that booth and see the Kennedy name and vote for him. God would that be an upset. But we have Dielbold to thank for that never being possible.

Here's a really wicked connection.

What did Diebold make before voting machines. ATM's Cha-Ching! The bankers count our votes...

I am reasonable.

I realize there will rarely be candidates I can vote for that I agree with 100%, or even 75%. That's fine. And when there are, I've come to learn not many other voters join me in supporting them. I hope that changes someday.

Right now is a great opportunity for those other candidates however. I'm willing to consider a compromise! For the first time that I can remember, I am offering to be a single-issue voter. Why? Well, for the first time that I can remember, a libertarian issue is being seriously considered by Congress. I can be bargained with!

We need another vote for auditing the Fed in the senate. Another co-sponsor would be even better.

I will plug my nose and vote to push a viable S.604 co-sponsor into the Senate.

I have found no public statements from Scott Brown regarding S.604 or the Fed in general.

Oh no! He's running out of time to support S.604 and win my vote! Without that support, I, along with a likely margin of victory, will vote for a Kennedy in a few hours.

I am the Fed Audit Voting Bloc!

Look at it this way. The establishment wll continue doing the same thing it is doing, accelerating the complete and total economic collapse of the US. I say bring it on. The sooner the better.

This guy is FOR socialized medicine. Just his own flavor of it.

The real liberty candidate is Joe Kennedy the Independent. (really Libertarian)

Brown is a neo-con. A RINO. If he had a "D" next to his name, he wouldn't have to change any policy positions, and the liberals would love him and Republicans would hate him.

You have been HAD. Quick, fix that and come to your senses before you vote tomorrow and alert everyone you know.

I support Joe Kennedy.

Scott Brown supports mass murder in the Middle East and abortion mills, out of control government spending, indefinite detention without trial or public defenders for Gitmo detainees, amnesty for illegals and Romneycare.

What's to like about Scot Brown?

i'm going to start cursing and breaking things in about 5 minutes

There is a difference... Obama is campaigning for Coakley

How do I get him to stop calling my home?

I'm voting for Kennedy.

And wait for the real freedom loving candidates in November.

Brown is not even in the same universe as freedom.