0 votes

Government and Population Control

many were/are created by man.
Maybe H1N1 ?

Deanna Spingola


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The right to work and the money they earn for the family.

What is the solution to the population bomb? The education of women and the recognition of women’s rights may be the simplest answer to a complex problem though it won’t work overnight. Educated women with rights better control their own reproductive rates. The right to work and the money they earn for the family helps to reduce their reproductive rates. Statistics all indicate this to be true. One only needs to recognize that the highest population growth rates occur in countries where women are treated as chattel. An educated woman with equal rights is more likely to use contraceptives. A woman who is financially contributing to the family is less likely to become pregnant. An increased standard of living concurrently increases the literacy and rights of women.

While it is a plan, trade agreements must be re-tooled to protect American jobs yet still encourage economic growth in the Third World.

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”

Seems to me

that abortion has become the most effective route for population control. Only problem is the population seems to overutilize it to the extent that our government has been forced to allow an unprecedented influx of illegal lower class individuals to support the upper class's requirements for cheap labor. It appears that it is easier to control borders than libido's.

There are no politicians or bankers in foxholes.

This is a constant theme on the DP

But no one seems to be able to explain to me why populations are all growing. Why didn't the H1N1 vaccine or virus kill off a bunch of people ? ? The current Birth rate globally is 134 million births per year, and the population is increasing at 1.34 %/ year. Killing a few 100,000 people here and there does not really effect global populations, you need to kill millions.

So it looks like Rockefeller has been wholly ineffective at reducing populations so far.

Yeah,but how many people

would be on the planet if they did NOT
implement those nasty methods? Also,the stuff they've been using takes longer, but I think you'll see a change through

Read "Behold a Pale Horse"

by William Cooper and you will get your answer. They started AIDS that killed more than a few thousand. They are just getting started.

"We can see with our eyes, hear with our ears and feel with our touch, but we understand with our hearts."