| |
  
|
||||||||||
" A place to send family members for a little exposure to alternate news"
Submitted by roots on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 01:48
in
Were it not for Ron Paul, I would not be here...... Seriously trying to break the matrix for family members. Is anyone willing to give me some constructive criticism ?? |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
From what I know about hypnosis, this will probably not work
You cannot lead people to truth, but you can be well versed in the lies. When THEY see something that they don't buy, be there with the right anecdote. The acceptance of truth must begin with their own curiosity. Something within them has to WANT truth.
Our society is trained by our schools, churches, social organizations, etc, to want to be part of the group. In the current political climate, knowing truth is not fashionable. We really are like a society of 12 year olds, and being liked is more important than doing what is right and having the support of peers is more important than speaking truth.
So, for instance, if some environmentalist were to say, "Man, all that snow in DC makes me wonder about the global warming thing..." THEN you show him a little Climategate video on youtube. No more than ten minutes, the kids can't take it. Then tell them you are "not sure" either, and ask them to help you sort it out. Tell them about some scientist you heard about, and them to see if they can find out what he said.
Why does this method work better? Because as much as 12 year olds like being part of the "in" crowd, there is also a desire for "hidden" knowledge, to know secrets, to discover things no one else knows... THAT desire can override the "must fit in" trance. A ton of information that they do not have any desire to learn about will only serve to convince them that the problem is too big for them, or that you are "just paranoid about EVERYTHING" or some such mental escape hatch.
Good luck. I am fighting against the mind numbing effects of fluoride with my family. Several of them take their yummy flouride pills, drink that yummy water, don't give a damn about anything any more and when I try to get them to look at anything about fluoride, they get afraid that I am going to take away that lovely pill that makes all the problems of the world so much easier to ignore... They are not curious. I know it is a losing battle, but I cannot stop trying, either.
Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.
Thanks for that !
I'm trying my best to come up with something to make it easy for people to fall down the rabbit hole.
Your comment is appreciated !!!!!
RH
Looks good, however....
...why not support one of the sites that already are spreading your message rather than duplicating efforts?
Missed point !
I am trying to bring as many elements of the truth movement together without chasing people away. This is specifically designed to wake up people that have not been exposed to this kind of information.
Thanks for your input... I hope that explains things..Thanks for the links also..
RH
The one the only
www.rense.com/
"welcome my son welcome to the machine"
The troll$heviks will gnash their teeth, from the rocks they crawl beneath, their train of logic hit a cow, we must not hurt the phony Dow
Start easy
Don't overwhelm them with too much truth all at once. Gotta ease into it.
Send 'em to drudgereport.com. If they're inclined to think for themselves, that'll provide a starting point.
Thanks !
Your right... I don't want it to be overwhelming.
You will see things change from time to time
RH
Here's a site I've been enjoying:
http://www.blacklistednews.com/index.php
Spent a little time there when DP was down.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love my country
I am appalled by my government
Hello 1 hour member!
No chance you're related to livfreod, who also seems to repeatedly promote that blog here...that is, unless he's called out on it.
LibertyDefined.org | If | Not Perfect
Yes I confess !!
I have learned my lesson. I was getting a bit too excited about the whole thing!
Anyway I'll be good, I promase.really am looking for feedback on the blog though.
RH
Fair enough:
I find nailing someone to the wall with a barrage of facts is only effective in person, and even then not the wisest move. When I look at this site, I see Stuff! Everywhere! Like a news channel, with that dang crawl! I don't know where to click or what any particular message is.
That's my main beef against blogs. They're like messy memories. I'd rather use tech to clarify my mind than place its arbitrarity on a...long...pedestal.
To expect your family to go there and watch...everything...or anything in particular is a gamble. Which one will they pick? What if it's that really out-there one, and they don't make the link or take the necessary steps to understand its conclusions? The rest won't be watched.
When I find something I think makes a convincing argument, I put it here, supporting one of my main points. When one I speak with asks for more information, I send them there. There are a lot of links, yes, but it's a concise overview, and the messages are clear and understandable.
The techno-eyeball looks nice and all. But is it conducive to making someone want to return? (psst, and why does it say "trial" at the bottom of the page?)
I'm certainly not saying my site is any better, because mine's just an inventory for myself.
Lastly, I would argue in general the net needs no more content aggregators, but instead more quality content creators.
If your intent is true, I mean not to dissuade you. But it felt like you were trying to force something, which is far less wise than letting something worthwhile voluntarily emerge.
LibertyDefined.org | If | Not Perfect
About the word Trial
Oh, bye the way!!
The word trial plastered all over the place means that the
template software is the free version. I will not be doing any advertising on there, so when i get you to send me a donation, I will be sure to put it towards an upgrade.....
RH
I hear you !!
I understand your point and it is well taken. That's why I'm asking for feedback.
by the way !! right now I have a return rate of over 20% and rising as i speak so i must be on to something. I know that statistisc are a bit subjective, but 70% of my hits are staying for over a hour.
Thanks for your input... I just don't see what you mean about stuff that's out there. What's öut there? name it !!!
RH
öut there?
Numbers are real pushovers; they'll do whatever they're told, even if it's lying.
Zeitgeist is at least 1/3 wrong, for one. People talk about "project bluebeam", which is silliness. At least half to most of the information presented on projectcamelot.org is bunk. The point of creating a culture of conspiracy is to validate the "kook" label and distract from real problems. This is done by purposeful misdirection and mixing in plenty of false information; our own governmental agencies admit to it.
The biggest problem is the victimology people fall into, cursing the darkness, when it is so much more enabling to know the truth.
LibertyDefined.org | If | Not Perfect
Good catch.
Good catch.