Tea Parties Start to Look Like MoveOn deja vu
The tea parties will become a Republican version of MoveOn if they're not mindful of history. That will mean not accomplishing a single one of their stated goals. That may sound strange, so let's go back a few years.
MoveOn was started by a handful of activists concerned about the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Like the tea parties, it was a grassroots effort that relied on activists with little or no political experience. The Internet and current events brought them together against a government run amuck.
MoveOn became a force to be reckoned with. It was an organization initially funded by small contributions. As its members traded e-mails and discussions in the blogosphere, small meetings started to materialize. These small meetings became large meetings.
The Democratic machine eventually took note. It capitalized on themes of ending the war, election reform, impeaching Bush and otherwise holding the Republican majority accountable. Democrats weren't shy about letting these new activists work for the party, but sharing power was another story. Like the tea parties today, people were asking where these new activists were when the problem started. But they moved forward with the single-minded goal of replacing Republicans.
Democratic campaigns came in, offering to move these new activists along in the party. They brought them on board with campaigns and offered them paid positions. Eventually, a long series of personal army requests from the establishment led to a Democratic takeover in 2006 and the presidency of Barack Obama in 2008.
In 2007, the Democrats to gave Bush far more than he asked for. Impeachment was pulled off the table. Plans were cemented for a permanent presence of 50,000 troops in Iraq well after 2011, a plan that Obama hasn't deviated from. In 2010, all hope that MoveOn had for universal health care was the first thing to go. A progressive grassroots movement was effectively co-opted.
A few independent thinkers like Cindy Sheehan saw this coming after the Democratic takeover. The party, however, had other plans. Sheehan was effectively dispatched from the movement as the machine she worked so hard for turned on ending the war. It was all about electing Democrats from the very beginning.
continue reading here
http://theday.com/article/20100207/OP05/302079985
- Login to post comments




















Dan's right on with this
Dan's right on with this article. The Tea Party has been completely hijacked by the GOP. While he may think it's not too late, I can't necessarily agree.
Great article,
that is why it is NOT about a party it is about the Integrity of the Candidates. We need a tea party from all parties, against the war and big government. It's not the party it's the Integrity of the Individual.
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
here is a quote
"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history." - Mohandas Gandhi
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul
Great quote!
Btw...
MoveOn became a force to be reckoned with. It was an organization initially funded by small contributions. As its members traded e-mails and discussions in the blogosphere, small meetings started to materialize. These small meetings became large meetings.
. @ @ . Power to the People!
@ O @ -----> PEOPLE
. @ @ . NOT Corporate Entities!
Excellent Post RPL, The core
Excellent Post RPL, The core of the Tea party movement in my opinion is dead set against any party co-opting. The Tea Party Convention was an attempt by the GOP to hijack. I think it was soundly rejected. Only the suckers that paid 599 bucks were suckered.
http://www.operationpitchfork.com/2.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJ2ep_odgo
There is no Left or Right -- there is only freedom or tyranny. Everything else is an illusion, an obfuscation to keep you confused and silent as the world burns around you." - Philip Brennan
"Invest only in things that you can stand in front of and pr
Tea Parties
I do not believe there should be a National Tea Party organization. Tea Parties should organize into 50 independent State organizations that focus on their respective State elections. If any State groups then want to affiliate with other State on regional or national issues they can then pickup a phone and call other State groups if they so desire. I do not see the need for a national group that can be controlled by a handful of people.
Excellent point.
In keeping with the constitutional "flavor" of the Tea Parties, they should be state organizations, if they are going to be organized at all.
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~