Jane Hamsher on HuffPo: Ron Paul vs. Sarah Palin for the Soul of the Tea Parties

0 votes

by Jane Hamsher
Founder, FireDogLake.com
February 10, 2010 | Huffington Post

There's trouble brewing between the Ron Paul libertarians who staged the the first modern tea party in 2007 by dumping tea into Boston Harbor, and the neocon war hawks led by Sarah Palin who are furiously trying to hijack their message.

After I appeared on MSNBC talking about Sarah Palin's appearance at the Nashville tea party convention, several libertarians told me they were unhappy with the exchange.

I said that Sarah Palin's hawkish message on Iran was oddly out of place in a group whose roots belong to the Ron Paul libertarians, particularly as the anti-interventionist Rand Paul is looking strong in the Kentucky Senate Senate race -- and Palin just endorsed him. The woman who appeared with me representing the tea partiers disagreed with that premise, and claimed she was very much an interventionist.

My libertarian friends couldn't imagine what she was doing on TV representing the tea parties in the first place, and thought it was a sad day when the opposition stated their position more fairly than their supposed allies.

Continue at: Huffington Post

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

GET THE FACTS!!!!

I don't like plug any mainstream source, BUT check this little dig out.

SPREAD THIS LIKE WILDFIRE!!!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/09/anti tea-party-web-site-scheme-funnel-funds/

LIBERTY OR DEATH!!!

Here's a link

Saran Wrap Sarah...

what a pathetic little opportunist you are. Problem is, I can see right thru you.

great article...

excellent insight!

great article. it's good to

great article. it's good to have friends all across the ballpark.

strange how we're receiving

strange how we're receiving good publicity from a newspaper that's owned by a woman, Arianna Huffington, who went to Alan Greenspan's wedding.

Operation Schiff!!!

grassroots initiative for Peter Schiff is taking off!

www.TomatoBubble.com/schiff.html

The TEA-O-CONS, Neo cons who co-opted Ron's Tea Party

We should make this term part of the American political lexicon...

TEA-O-CON

Why be a TEA-O-CON,....

When you can join the R3VOLUTION and party like it's 1776!

But that man should play the tyrant over God, and find Him a better man than himself, is astonishing drama indeed!~~D. Sayers

There is no difference between an authoritarian government from the right or the left...F. A.Schaeffer

Excellent

You hit it.

TEA-O-CON

..."TEA-O-CONS"...

...nice one... ;)
...This is in my vocabulary now...
...Thanks maximus1215...

RON2012PAUL...The r3VOLution continues...
"I always win"
http://youtu.be/Xtl2ZuJpG9M
+GOLD and SILVER are money+
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThisIsRogueLiberty

I happily second that

And have been using the term often, and roundabout the internet.

Most current "tea partiers" do not know what "libertarian" means

It's not meant as an insult - it's just a fact. Most of them have next to no idea who Ron Paul is. I think there is danger in getting too embroiled in this story line. There are probably a great many people who would like to see an association established in the minds of the masses between RP and this "Tea Party". Ron Paul didn't inspire these peoples' "Tea parties".

reply

At first I was very unhappy that the Rand Paul campaign didn't immediately reject the Palin "endorsement" which was nothing more than a RNC trap. The Paul camp did the smart thing which was saying "gee whiz thanks" and letting the issue die a quick media death ... which is the last thing the RNC wanted.

I like how the verbiage has changed

Once we were isolationists.

Now they are interventionists.

Very cool -

Pretty soon the DP will be on the news everyday. We're the new political consultants.

Obama = O.ne B.ig A.ss M.istake A.merica

That would be so cool! I sent

That would be so cool! I sent my comment in HuffPo to Jane Hamsher's article and informed all of their readers about www.dailypaul.com

Yes, soon Michael Nystrom will be in MSM-interviews:)

"Air is the very substance of our freedom, the substance of superhuman joy....aerial joy is freedom."--Gaston Bachelard--

Dude

I've been following the DP since 2007.
When I first started looking at it, it was nothing but whatever could be scraped from youtube on Ron Paul, postings from mike, jane aitken and the zen piper.

Now, it is a flood of political conversation that is of ultimate relevance to the realm of ideas. It tickles me that Michael's little "my favorite thinker" blog has become the treasure chest of information for semi mainstream news outlets.

"Freedom Is A Road Seldom Traveled By The Multitude." - Frederick Douglass

Nice

read. Good to see the true tea party originator Ron Paul having his position defended.

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must. like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.-Thomas Paine

The R3volution requires action, not observation!!!!

Good article but these

Good article but these journalists like Glen and Jane keep getting our immigration stance wrong. I left this comment on the Huff Po article:

Contrary to popular belief, Libertarians and Ron Paul for that matter are for open borders and believe immigration is immiGREAT!

We oppose the welfare state which is widely used by illegals when legislated for American citizens, that's why Paul takes a stance against amnesty. He's for the rule of law and against the welfare state not immigration.

Ron Paul is also pragmatic enough to understand that if he had the power he'd save so much money by bringing the troops home he'd be able to fund many welfare programs he in principle disagrees with. He wouldn't end the welfare overnight but hopefully by ending the war buy time to lower the debt and slowly ween the public off the government "care."

In defense of Hamsher

While there is indeed a lot of misunderstanding and confusion about Ron Paul's immigration stance among the media, commentariat and the public (just see the debate you've inspired even amongst Paul supporters), nothing in this particular article indicates that Hamsher has gotten anything wrong.

All she says is that she has disagreements with Ron Paul on immigration. Whether you characterize him as pro-immigrant, anti-immigrant, or none of the above, I think it is beyond dispute that Ron Paul's policy views on immigration include:

1. Illegal immigrants should not be granted amnesty or a path to citizenship
2. Birthright citizenship should be ended

As long as Hamsher disagrees with some stance that Ron Paul takes on immigration (& I'd put money on her disagreeing at the very least with #2, which is after all a very uncommon position) then she's right to say that she disagrees with Ron Paul on immigration.

"Despite our disagreements on immigration, unions and host of other issues, I have respect for libertarians like Bruce Fein and Ron Paul who took a lot of arrows in the back from fellow Republicans during the Bush years for opposing FISA, domestic spying, warrentless wiretapping, the wars and the bank bailout."

I'm going out of my way here to defend Jane Hamsher, because this was a very fair and frankly awesome article--and because she and FDL have been amazing allies in the cause of bringing transparency to the Fed. Because, as she points out, her section of the netroots and the Paulites see eye to eye on so much (especially the really important stuff, like empire and basic civil liberties) I'm hoping that collaboration between the two camps will continue into the future. She has demonstrated huge goodwill towards us in the past and in recent days (mentioning DP on TV, writing this article), I see no reason not to extend the same to her.

If there is somewhere else where Jane has mischaracterized Ron Paul's views on immigration, please point it out to me, but she certainly did nothing of the sort here (in fact, she could hardly have mischaracterized his position given that she didn't characterize it at all.)

BTW, while some libertarians are for open borders, Ron Paul, while he very well might think most immigrants are immiGREAT and having more would be immiGREATER, is not among them. He thinks that it is a duty of the Federal Government to monitor the borders, enforce immigration laws, and keep out people who might pose a threat to national security or harbor certain communicable diseases. So yes, though Ron Paul, contrary to popular opinion, does not hate immigrants, that does not imply that he is for open borders; there is plenty of middle ground. Wikipedia tells us that an "open border" is "a border that allows unrestricted entry and exit" and gives as an example the internal EU borders where no travel document is required to cross, nor must you even talk to any sort of border guard. Noone but nutty anarchists like me (and pre-9/11 G W Bush, iirc) would even consider something so absurd.

I believe you're misstating

I believe you're misstating Ron's immigration position.

I'll digress into my own for a moment: I'm a "Law-'n-Order" libertarian: I want to repeal most of the laws. But they have to be repealed in an appropriate order or repealing some makes things get worse. So I can't go along with the Libertarian Party's (IMHO naive) willingness to grab whatever piece of their ultimate goals comes within reach, without regard to the consequences.

My own position on illegal immigration and "open borders" is that the massive handouts available to those coming in illegally creates an incentive structure leading to a positive-feedback collapse into a bread-and-circuses welfare state: More illegal immigrants-> more transfer payments -> more voters for more "services" -> more illegal immigrants. Thus opening the borders, while it would be nice, has to wait until the Welfare State is beaten back.

I understand that Ron Paul's position is compatible with this. While I don't know how much of his opposition to illegal immigration is based on the same practical reasoning and how much is based on a return to the rule of law, I DO know that he is OPPOSED to illegal immigration and amnesty (diverging from much of the libertarian movement).

= = = =
"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job."

That means: For each job "created or saved" about five were destroyed.

Is there

such a thing as a "Law-And-Order" Libertarian?

I thought that was just a Republican.

I don't think I misstated his

I don't think I misstated his position at all. In fact you just reiterated my argument. Did you read my entire comment or just the first paragraph?

I think both of you might be

I think both of you might be a little bit off. Ron Paul is for open borders? I've never heard him make that claim.

But I have heard him say that immigrants are scapegoats, and that he does oppose the welfare and freebies going to immigrants, legal, illegal, as well as citizens.

He doesn't believe in freebies for anyone.

Now my own opinion is that we have to control our borders.

Let's take a visit to Ron Paul nation in 2100. Maybe at that point we have taken his advice, and we have controlled borders, no freebies from the government, and states rights, a restored constitution.... in this imaginary world, it's easy to think that Mexico's people would be welcome to come over to work. There would be a streamlined way for them to come over here, and a way for us to get over there.

But to jump back to reality, I think "no amnesty" means "no amnesty". And controlled borders means controlled borders. That's what has to happen now. Just like "no freebies" for anyone. Not from the federal government.

d

Nice

comment, a silence production.

Very enjoyable read--thanks to the OP for sharing!

Berwick, Columbia County, Pennsylvania
Ron Paul 2012 - The People's Choice
rEVOLution SuperPAC: http://www.revolutionpac.com/
WTP Federal Lawsuit to BAN ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2011-07-26...

Good article, and I'm impressed

at the mostly sensible comments following the article at HuffPo

Bump

Bump

I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees...

I went...

from just a dislike and distrust of Palin to an outright 'eff off' attitude towards her.

Telling the tea party folks to stay decentralized? Wonder how that would help her political ambitions?

'Peace is a powerful message.' Ron Paul

Great article

Note that Hamsher states she was at Ron Paul's Rally for the Republic, along with Andrew Sullivan.

This is great perspective from the outside of the movement.