Videos on ABC 13 Houston: Debra Medina

0 votes

Says she expected to take flack when she got over the target.

ABC 13 Houston to air an extended interview w/Debra concerning Glenn Beck.

Game on.

3 minute news segment:

10 minute interview:

http://abclocal.go.com/kt...

Thanks to Neverquit for finding the link.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This whole political SNAFU

This whole political SNAFU makes you realize how politically savvy Rand is. Personally, I have no problem if she lied to Beck if it would help her get elected.

I googled this yesterday. I found a reputable looking article

Going from memory only..... Said the 39 police that died were from the port authority and 200 something firemen died. The New York City police were given an evacuation order. They were on separate radio systems. The article seemed to be a few years old and said the problem wasn't fixed yet. I assume this is what she heard about. I didn't bookmark it unfortunately.

Can we please have some real change?

Abc 13 says Debra ask how come no police were killed during the

collapse only firefighters ! Am I the only one demanding proof she said that. Any links?

If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!

what she said

was after beign asked "what kind of important questions"...

She said that 10 years ago she had heard something about the firefighter thing.

She did NOT say she was affirming that.

That's true, but

Shouldn't it have been obvious that such talk would be twisted by the media? Surprise, surprise!! It was.

It was in that press

It was in that press conference. The video is in three parts somewhere on the DailyPaul. She said it.

reply

What matters here is who is in control of the debate, not who is telling the truth. Debra was in control because she was sticking to her message which is a home run platform, as soon as she let Glenn Beck drag her astray by answering his sleazy curveball question she put him and Fox News and the Perry campaign in charge ... hopefully she can recover and in the future please just button up.

All of US.... need to be prepared to deal with these charges:

1) -- 9/11 truther - the govt did it
2) -- Birther -- Obama is not American born
3) -- Racists -- you hate minorities
4) -- You hate the poor & the elderly
5) -- You love the rich & rich corporations

Indeed, we should make a thread that just gives good responses and answers to all 5 charges.

In peace & liberty,
Treg

Did you start one?

start one...

A chess game

the opponent made an aggressive move ....

and may be just now recognizing their own mistake

This news report begins slandering Medina right from beginning.


In the opening clip, the volume is tampered with so that it is precisely increased while Medina says "...that makes me look like I'm a crazy person, and Texans see that..."

Then the reporter goes on to call Debra Medina's campaign "insurgent." In recent times, "insurgent" has been used to describe the enemy or so called terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This is the same type of deception and manipulation that was practiced by the media against Ron Paul's presidential campaign.

Can you point out the other bits of biased slander against Medina?

Paster Chuck Baldwin

This is a very important article so I copied and posted it here for Real Tea Party and Ron Paul supporters.
A WARNING TO THE TEA PARTY NATION

By Chuck Baldwin
February 12, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

As far as grassroots activism goes, the surge in Tea Parties across America is one of the more encouraging developments to recently take place. It reminds me of the "Conservative Revolution" of 1994, when the GOP reclaimed both the US Senate and House of Representatives. At that time, it had been over 40 years since the Republican Party controlled both the US House and Senate. And, between the two, the House victories were the most significant.

Spurred mostly by the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, a host of young, energetic freshman Republicans marched into Washington, D.C., determined to return a burgeoning and out-of-control federal leviathan to the constitutional precepts of limited government. I'm talking about then-freshman House members such as Helen Chenoweth, Steve Largent, Bob Barr, Joe Scarborough, Sonny Bono, John Shadegg, J.C. Watts, etc. These young conservatives went to Washington, D.C., determined to reduce the growth and size of the federal government.

The vehicle used to transport these young conservatives from grassroots activism to US House and Senate seats was the highly touted "Contract with America" (CWA), which was orchestrated by House Speaker-to-be, Newt Gingrich. The CWA included a promise to the American people that if they would give the GOP a majority in Congress, they would eliminate up to 5 federal departments--such as the Departments of Energy and Education--and many federal agencies.

Obviously, not only did the GOP-controlled Congress not eliminate a single federal department or agency--or even shrink the size of the federal government at all--it expanded the size and scope of the federal government at every level. And there is one reason for it: Big Government neocons posing as champions of conservatism co-opted and destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994.

If one wants to put names to these treasonous wretches (and I do), I'm talking about charlatans such as Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott. Anyone who thinks that Newt Gingrich is a real conservative or that he will do anything to reduce the size and scope of the federal government needs to speak with any of those Republican members of the freshman class of 1994. (Sadly, too, some of the members of that great freshman class went on to become Big Government toadies themselves. Such is the power of that Putrid Province by the Potomac.)

The Tea Parties of 2010 remind me very much of the Conservative Revolution of 1994. And if the Tea Party Nation is not very careful, they will succumb to the same fate. The signs of a silent takeover of the movement are already appearing.

First of all, the Tea Parties were actually born during the Presidential campaign of Congressman Ron Paul of Texas in 2007 and 2008. For all intents and purposes, the Tea Parties and the Ron Paul Revolution were one and the same. These were (mostly) young people, who were sick and tired of the same old establishment Republican Party. They were tired of establishment Republicans selling out the principles of limited government; they were tired of the US Constitution being ignored and trampled by both Republicans and Democrats; they were tired of an incessant interventionist US foreign policy that keeps sending US forces overseas to advance a burgeoning New World Order (NWO); they were tired of perpetual war; they were tired of the bank bailouts; they were tired of the Federal Reserve; etc.

I know this because I met--and spoke before--the Tea Party Nation in State after State as I campaigned for Dr. Paul during the Republican primaries back in 2008. And I met them again all over America, as I was running as an Independent candidate for President--with Ron Paul's endorsement, no less. I was with them in scores of meetings (big and small) from Washington, D.C., to Spokane, Washington, and all points in between.

But now many of the Tea Parties are distancing themselves from Dr. Paul and embracing establishment players such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. Even Newt Gingrich is being courted. Watch out, Tea Party Nation: you're in danger of losing your soul! Newt Gingrich is not one of you. He is not your friend. He is an imposter. He will destroy you just like he almost single-handedly destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994.

Plus, be careful about Sarah Palin and other establishment Republicans. Palin is currently playing both sides. She is promoting Big Government neocons such as John McCain on the one hand, and sincere conservative-libertarians such as Rand Paul on the other hand. But if one wants a real barometer of Palin's true colors, look no further than her endorsement of Rick Perry in Texas.

Perry is the quintessential establishment Republican. Perry has been in office for some 9 years, and what has he done to thwart the NWO in Texas? Nothing! Perry is even a Bilderberg Group attendee. What has he done for State sovereignty in Texas? Nothing? In fact, he supports the North American Union and the NAFTA superhighway. What has he done to resist Obama's universal health care proposals? Nothing! What has he done to protect the citizens of Texas against an emerging Police State? Nothing! What has he done to fight illegal immigration? Nothing!

As a result of both Rick Perry's establishment business-as-usual politics in Texas and the proliferating grassroots Tea Party movement, counterattacking establishment politics, a Tea Partier herself has entered the race for Texas governor. Her name is Debra Medina. As the Tea Party Nation in Texas already knows, Medina is one of you.

Medina is committed to preserving Texas' independence and sovereignty. She is opposed to the Patriot Act. She will secure the Texas border. She will give Texas Vermont-style open carry freedoms for gun owners. She wants to get rid of unconstitutional property taxes in Texas. She will stop the NAFTA superhighway. Medina is the real deal.

So, what did Sarah Palin do? She went to Texas and endorsed Rick Perry! I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, playing political games in order to rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars on the speaking and book-signing circuits is not what the Tea Parties are all about.

Tea Parties are supposed to be about putting principle over politics, supporting and defending the US Constitution, supporting limited government and personal liberty, getting rid of the Federal Reserve, abolishing the IRS, ending preemptive and pervasive wars, and putting truth and integrity back into government.

Don't get me wrong; there are things about Sarah Palin that I like. I especially appreciate her pro-life and pro-Second Amendment stands. I also appreciate her signing the Alaska State sovereignty resolution while she was governor. By all indications, she did a good job as Alaska's chief executive. At the national level, however, she favors the Patriot Act--and even wants to expand it. She supported the banker bailouts. And when it comes to foreign policy issues, Palin is just another neocon. Plus, as with most Republicans at the national level, I think she is clueless about the NWO. And please remember, it was Mr. New World Order himself, Henry Kissinger, who vetted Palin on behalf of McCain.

The Tea Party Nation should expect better!

The Nation also needs to be careful about Glenn Beck. He says many of the right things. He is likeable and charismatic; but he's also dead wrong on a number of issues--issues that are critical to the Tea Party Nation. He's dead wrong when he attempts to disparage and impugn Congressman Ron Paul, saying Dr. Paul is a "crazy, kooky guy." He's dead wrong in supporting the banker bailouts. He's dead wrong when he supports raising taxes (which he has done on several occasions). He was dead wrong when he supported the Patriot Act. He is dead wrong when he viciously attacks the 9/11 victims' families who demand further information about what happened to their loved ones on that fateful day. And he is dead wrong when he mocks people such as Alan Keyes and Joe Farah for demanding that Barack Obama release his birth certificate--if he indeed has one.

And now I hear that there are some self-professed members of the Tea Party Nation who are actually running for Congressman Paul's US House seat in Texas. If this is not a sign that establishment Republicans are hijacking the Tea Party movement, I don't know what is. Remember, the Tea Party movement began as a support base for the Ron Paul Revolution back in 2007.

I strongly encourage the Tea Party faithful to read Jane Hamsher's recent column on this subject.

I say again, be careful, Tea Party Nation. You are being infiltrated. You are being compromised. You are being neutered. Stick to your principles. Stick with the Constitution. Keep opposing unconstitutional, preemptive wars. Keep calling for the abolition of the Federal Reserve. Keep fighting for less taxes, reduced federal spending, and states' rights. Keep opposing the Patriot Act and the New World Order. Don't abandon Ron Paul. Be wary of people such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. You don't need "big name" celebrities to give you credibility. As Samson's strength depended on keeping his hair uncut, your strength lies in keeping your principles intact. And unless you want to wind up like the Republican freshmen in 1994, avoid Newt Gingrich like the plague!

Liberty is our campaigns gift to the world it is our manifest destiny.
Freedom is a movement who's time has come. Our campaign will lead world wide freedom.

There you go

on path to freedom if there is such a thing.

If we are infiltrated it is because we trust what people say not what they do. We connot know what ther motives are.

When someone talks they influence only those who want to hear and agree with what they are saying. If they are worth their salt, thats what all politicians do, so you won't disagree they frame their ideas around what you want to hear, .

and then you die

The Crucial Point:

Recognizing the plain fact that conspiracy theories exist regarding the 1963 President Kennedy assassination, does not require Medina to take any position at all, either for or against the Warren Commission Report, period.

Recognizing the right of American citizens to question their government, on any topic, does not in any way require or force Medina to take any position on asked questions.

Otherwise Medina would have to become a serious student of all topics unrelated to Texas and unrelated to the specific job of governing Texas.

Simple logic.

Debra Medina, "Remember The Gipper"

Debra Medina, 'Remember The Gipper.' He Answered His Opponents By Saying, "Let me Tell You What I'm All About And What I Believe In For The People Of Texas..

DON'T PLAY THEIR GAME DEBRA...Beware Of Traps..You Need To Calm Down..Talk About Asking Questions About 9-11 Or Birthers Is Ammunition For Your Enemies..

Tell Them Only About What You Will Be Fighting For All Texans..National Issues Need Not Be Address..Your Not Running For President Of The United States..

Talk About All The Promises That Your Opponents Have Made To The People Of Texas And That All Of These Promises Were Nothing But Empty Promises To Get Themselves Elected.. Tell Them It's Time For The People Of Texas To Be Represented; One Of Their Own Kind, Someone Who Truely Cares For The Rights Of The People Of Texas.. Speak With Enthusiasm And Hope.

Refer To Your Enemies As Your Opponents..No Name Calling Allowed Here.. For The Most Part, Keep Your Answers Short And Brief Debra..Yes And No Answers..

THAT'S IT !!

Your Winning My Dear !! The More Your Attacked The Greater The margin Of Victory..

Glenn Beck Has Finally Opened His Big Neo-Con Mouth Too Much And Has Exposed Himself For The Lying Fraud That He Is..His Cockiness Has Revealed His True Intent And Evil Minded Attitude..His 9-12 Has Been A Fraud From Day One..It Was To Stop Ron Paul, His Supporters And His Freedom Movement..Your In That Same League As Ron Paul And He can't Stand It !!

"The Devil Intended To Do Evil, But God Meant It For Good.....

Becks Downfall Has Been Your Blessing..

Remember, Be As Wise As A Serpent, But Harmless As A Dove...

Love Always For Liberty,

A Friend From California

I kinda agree. She needs to

I kinda agree. She needs to lead the discussion to Texas, taxes and property, not get bogged down with this. when people ask RP a question he says, no, and then totally goes off on the tangent he wants to talk about. She is honest, and WE appreciate that, but it is not politically savy. And for all those who want more honesty than savy, well, good luck getting elected.

this reporter blows hard.

"i really wanna move on from this......"

BUT......

i'm gonna keep asking these stupid ass questions.

deb is awesome. and she isn't going to cave on your lame F'd up bullshit.

end of story, bitches.

and 9/11 WAS an inside job. dick.

Name Recognition

The more interviews, airtime, forum discussions, blogs, and newspapers coverage the better.

When Texas Republicans go to vote for the primary they will not vote for someone they have never heard of, that is why name recognition is essential. Imagine you are standing in a voting booth and you see three names in front of you; Perry, Hutchinson, Medina.

You think; Perry = Big Government, Hutchinson = Big Government, Medina ... hmm I heard of her and she definitely doesn't sound like Big Government.

She's making it worse.

She's making it worse.

No one is questioning anybody's right to speak out if they believe 9/11 was an inside job.

And the question wasn't unfair or out of left field, it was a layup. Yes, people may be out to get her, but that easy question was not an example of that. When you gain in the polls, you get more attention. It reminds me of when Palin kind of blamed her awful interview with Katie Couric on Katie Couric.

you're making it worse.

ok so you agree that people are out to get her....

but then 9/11 is an easy question???

really?

sounds like you've not gone to ae911truth.org and watched Blueprint For Truth.

Why did Glenn Beck have Debra

Why did Glenn Beck have Debra Medina on his show?

GLENN: ...We put this candidate on the air because we remember hammered by their supporters and I was sick and tired of being hammered by their supporters, quite honestly...

look at these truther comments

practically blaming the world for not changing within some 2 months before the election. do you guys really understand what we're trying to accomplish here? this is amazingly sad.

It's really sad. We need politicians with the courage to

not question anything. I'm a USS Liberty truther and a Gulf of Tonkin truther but I'm not a 9-11 truther. I think the government stopped doing bad things in the early 70s. If they were still doing bad things everything wouldn't be so darn wonderful right now. Please enlighten me; what are we trying to accomplish? I've been under the impression that our job is to protect the status quo while using the language of freedom--I'm sure you agree.

it's people like you

who think that when the world changes NEVER, it'll all be fine and dandy.

oh no......let's wait until after this election....or...

after my favorite soap opera......

i can't have the world change it's mind about what really happened on 9/11 until my soap is over.

what's "amazingly sad" is the droves of people in this god forsaken country who can't wake up to a screaming child that's lying directly next to them on the bed.

She doesn't

have to back peddle on anything. Did Glenn Shmeck ask Sarah Wannabe any 911 questions? Even how much is 9 plus 11? Anything? Buildings don't blow themselves up Glenn. The more truth that comes out the worse it gets for the MSM that to this day has kept real NEWS out of the news. Wake up America and smell the Nano-Thermite. 3000 dead....3 million questions

More evidence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX_UKdqoa_o

9/11 was an inside job .....time to get some answers..RP 2012

This is all just an extension

of Political Correctness doctrines.

Some group which is bolstered by mass-media opinion, attempts to set the rules about what subjects are NOT ALLOWED to be discussed.

As long as they can define the terms of the debate, and shout-down anyone who opposes them, on the grounds of Political Correctness, there can be no debate.
And that's exactly what they want. No debate.
They want lock-step agreement with what they say.

This subject is now the new "Holocaust" topic.
Nobody can "dare" question topics like this, or they'll be "shouted down" by the Political Correctness Police.

Here's a clue for you all.
The walrus was Paul... er,no
The things that aren't "allowed to be discussed", are where the they've swept things under the rug, and won't let you look. Or if you look, they'll call you names if you tell what you've seen, because they are guilty and they need to protect themselves from being found out. Those are the things that MUST be investigated, because it's a clear indication of guilt by people who are trying to hide something.

It's time that people grow a pair, ignore what these PC a**holes are saying, and kick them right in the teeth with some hard facts, very publicly, and not care what they say, or how much they try to shout us down.
If we can't even stand up to their PC attacks, what in the hell are we going to do when they start coming for us with guns? Ask them to come in for tea?
Time to get real, folks.
F*ck Political Correctness.
Fight back, and ignore their tactic.

Fight back, and ignore their tactic??

Let me know how that theory is working for you.

Media puppets want their jobs. When your getting paid to speak it doesn't matter what truth and justice are. How many media journalists need their jobs?

and then you die

I think this is interesting

If anyone cannot get elected speaking truth... then the world really is doomed... and it won´t matter whatever...
Talking the talk is useless...if honesty won´t lead the way in this crises... it won´t ever...
And I don´t care...cause then it is to late anyway..

It all comes down to

whether the Texan voters will think that she is less electable because of her doubts about government actions on the major events like 9/11.

Truther or not the 9/11 case is fuzzy at best. Saying anything else makes you a co-conspirator in the official conspiracy.

If nothing else makes you skeptical of the truth is that basically all elected politicians agree that there is nothing to investigate further - at least on camera.

I think Debra is a real deal and an honest, smart person. Politics is a dirty game in state and federal level and she should get used to being smeared. The same was done to Jesse Ventura after he won in Minnesota.

I certainly hope that people wont get steered to Perry or Kate. We are lucky that they are as bad as they are...