How to answer & respond to the Slander & Hard Questions....
All of US.... need to be prepared to deal with these charges & Questions from reporters. A TV reporter may not be at our front door asking, but then you never know:
1) -- 9/11 truther? - Do you think the govt did it?
2) -- Birther?-- Do you think Obama is not American born?
3) -- Racists? -- Do you hate minorities & Mexicans?
4) -- Do you hate the poor & the elderly?
5) -- Do you love the rich & rich corporations?
6) -- Do you take your marching orders from and support Bin Laden and the terrorist?
7) -- Why do you think Middle Eastern terrorists have rights under our American Constitution?
8) -- Why do you hate America?
9) -- Why do you think Government is too big?
10) - Why do you want to let people harm themselves doing drugs and trading money for all kinds of sex?
This is a thread that suggests good responses and answers to all 10 charges.
I think some of the best answers to these and other tough questions for freedom freaks can be found her by Dr. Mary Ruwart...
http://www.lfb.org/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=88
and John Stossel here:
http://www.lfb.org/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=357
But let me hear from you....
What are your thoughts and ideas....
What would you do if a TV reporter came and asked you in a kind of "Gottcha way?"
In peace & liberty,
Treg
.
11.) Do you hate MSNBC? - Yes.
12.) Do you hate FOX News? - Yes, definitely.
13.) Do you like Glenn Beck? - Only during power outages.
14.) How do you like Hannity? - Over hard, and well done.
15.) What about Bill O'Reilly? - Bill Who?, No. Shut up.
1) Regarding 9/11 Truth
I am willing, no matter how ugly, to concede the potential of administrative corruption to my self
Additionally, I've compiled a survey of common logical fallacies per the subject of 9/11 entitled "The Art of Debate"
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17838
It is important to distinguish between a government and a cabal
1) 9/11, Did the government do it?
A small number of well-placed, amoral, and determined people is all it takes to mount an operation which is essentially a coup. This is critical to emphasize to make Truth psychologically manageable to most people. The specter of an entire government of murderers in collusion is just too mind-blowing, not to mention untrue. That's not how coups work.
Study the Third World. A small number of officers coordinate a violent blow to the state, and the vast number of loyal officers who saw what has happened know enough to shut up, and save their questions for another day. A coup succeeds not only by force but, more importantly, through threat of further force. Once everyone is in line, the smooth functioning of government can begin again, with the new agenda.
Of course there are many lists of about 100 or so suspected conspirators which are speculation, but provide a good start. This list is as good as any.
http://whodidit.org/cocon.html
By emphasizing the small cabal theory over "the government did it," the average person may be able to deal with it without blowing a fuse. The real obstacle to 9/11 truth is not rational but psychological. You can argue rationally about physics and free-fall speeds all you want, but if the conclusion is too frightening, people will shut it out, and resort to all manner of nonsense to deny it. A government of pure evil is just too scary. But a strong and ruthless few followed by the cowed and frightened many is psychologically manageable, and probably something many people have experienced in their own lives.
A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.
-- Muhammad Ali
Great thread.
Glad I'm not running for office. Even if you have the best answers like Debra did, it doesn't stop the media from twisting what you said an even putting words into your mouth. I think I would say, " I am not answering that because that I'm late for an appointment. lol
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
..
I think there are much harder questions than those. Last week trying to convinve a relative of libertarian ideals and provide it as a solution to world's problem I was asked continuosly about the protection of workers against abusive bosses. Telling me that its not that easy to quit because your being abused legally.
My answer at the time was that with evolution job conditions have gotten better and better, and probably without government we would by now have much more job quality and quantity.
Dr Milton Friedman did a video ....
Look it up on YouTube.
I think it was called, "Who protects the worker?"
You may like it.
Ya know, it's funny, but
every one of those questions is an emotionally-charged question which have literally NOTHING to do with a person's qualifications or abilities to hold an office in gov't.
Those questions are ALL intended to be an emotional disqualifier, based on political correctness doctrines, as handed-down by the media.
I think maybe the candidates should start asking the interviewers some questions about what they are really trying to accomplish with questions like that.
Saying there are unanswered
Saying there are unanswered questions about 911 doesn't mean the gouvernment did it.
And Obama needs to be a natural born citizen for the office of POTUS. They love to mix that up with "citizen" or "born in the USA".
I would respond that I would
I would respond that I would be unwilling or unable to answer those questions because I disagreed with any number of presumptions they made by their very form and wording.
"The casualty of partisanship is objectivity."