The Southern Avenger: Terrorism, Liberal and Conservative
Submitted by meekandmild on Tue, 02/16/2010 - 11:33
The Southern Avenger: Terrorism, Liberal and Conservative
Submitted by meekandmild on Tue, 02/16/2010 - 11:33
|
|
||||||||
I have one.....
I read before that the old Oxford English Dictionary defines "terrorism" as government by intimidation.
That stuck with me and I would like to offer it up to Jack as a possible better definition.
I haven't fact checked it.
"You are not what you think you are, but what you think............. you are".
-Earl Nightingale
Jack Hunter....OUR ACE IN THE HOLE
The Southern Avenger Has Us Covered Down In DIXIE LAND..
The Charleston CHOO CHOO Is Smoken Hot !!
Great Work Jack !!
Another great video by the Southern Avenger!
I look forward to his short videos of uncommon sense in a confused world.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Oh I am in love!
Sometimes I wish I were single and at least ten years younger.
bump
who is this guy!?! love his candor
.
Excellent sending this out.
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
Without a doubt
His most brilliant yet. Keep'm coming!
To: SA
That was incredible. You could not of spelled it out any better. Pure common sense with cold hard facts is almost mind numbing. lol
5+ stars on this one and a happy face. :D
Thank you.
donvino
Wow
Just plain, WOW!
This man is a resource to be treasured.
you forgot something in your line of thinkin that's kinda huge
if both acts, 9/11 & the US nuking Japan were "terrorism", you are forgetting the other side of the argument, which is that both were also "acts of war". which is why Bush at least called it right that it is a "war" since it WAS and is a declared war against the US, called a jihad/fatwah. war is war...and it is ugly. i'm sorry you cannot get past your naivety and understand that the world is not a perfect ideological peaceful loving place with 'nice' people in it. if you remember right in WW2 it was the US's "stay out of it" attitude that allowed things to get so bad and go so far before we had to engage after we were attacked. same with 9/11, should it have just been ignored? i'm amazed how little you think of what price in blood has been paid for you to feel so secure that the thought of you actually having to put your life on the line, for the relative ease you have always enjoyed in this country, never enters your thoughts. it is not that way in many places in the world. no one likes war or killing, but you sure enjoy your peaceful freedom without it costing you anything.
For you to say to the US soldiers of WW2 that fought the Japanese (more died against Japan than against Germany) that they should have died by the 100's of thousands and not just dropped 2 bombs is unreal. i've studied it...Japan did not surrender before the nukes were dropped when Truman warned them about them and asked them to surrender or he would have to use them. Nor did they surrender after the 1st nuke was dropped. Japan didn't even surrender immediately after the 2 nuke was dropped. Several days separated each, giving them plenty of time to respond. so you are way off in your thinking about Truman and us nuking Japan. read history, everyone in the US agreed and was for it at that time because they knew after the fighting on Okinawa 100's of thousands if not millions of US soldiers would have died if they had to invaded Japan on the ground.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Christopher X
I suggest you do some original research into the evidence that is piling a mile high which points the finger at the CIA, Bush, Cheney, Mossad, etc. for 9/11.
The sons and grandsons of those who dropped the A bombs on Japanese women, children and the elderly also brought down the twin towers and Building 7. When life is cheap, life is cheap. The end justifies the means.
By the way, Japan was attempting to surrender for months BEFORE we nuked them.
Finally, the bankers instigated for WWI and WWII to promote their one world power grab. They funded both sides in both wars. Big profits all the way around, and giant steps toward their NWO.
The history you think you know is a banker-concocted fairytale. Don't believe me ... do the research yourself.
ever heard of the
"Bataan Death March"??? i don't think the bankers did that.
Do they teach history at all in schools anymore???
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Have you read
Pat Buchanan's Churchill, Hitler, and the Unecesssary War?
have you
ever had a daughter or a wife? what would you do if someone attacked her? a man that attacked my daughter or wife better hope the police gets to him 1st. just explaining my point by this example.
and after the treaty of Versailles was sign, Churchill said they would just have to do WW1 all again in 20 years because Germany would want revenge. he was right. Hitler and most of the Nazis were veterans of WW1 and were determined for conquest.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Too much Hollywood war propaganda?
I like your spirit, but I think you have watched too much Hollywood WW2 propaganda. It was really good, and most of us have believed it at one point or another.
I think you are struggling with facts on most of your posts on this topic. The quote you mention was probably Marshall Ferdinand Foch about the WW1 Treaty of Versailles which was something like: This is not peace. It is a truce for 20 years.
As to the US being necessary to win the war, that is really incorrect. Take a look at a map of the world at the time. Color the German Empire at the start one color, the Soviet Empire (successor state to the Russian empire which had been expanding for centuries and was about 16%+ of the world) another color, and the British EMPIRE (well over 20% of the world also with centuries of conquest under its belt)a third color. Or if you want to have it not look quite so bad, color Germany at its peak attacking both. Then, look up war production stats. Overwhelmingly in favor of Britain and USSR even without the US industrial might which obviously put it over the top in a big way. Plus with extremely rare exceptions German military equipment was no a match for Soviet, British, or American hardware. Like Germans adapting Soviet gas systems for rifles and captured American tank engines when they could get them. It happened over and over. Any thoughtful analysis can see Germany never had a chance. The real war was Germany/USSR on the eastern front and was something like 90% of the casualties etc. US casualties were something like 1%. Now, fighting USSR alone, might have had a chance to survive as a weak but larger country, because the USSR had purged(executed) most of its good officers not that long before the war. However, to say that USA saved the world from its say 3rd to 5th worst mass murderer by helping its first or second worst mass murderer is short sighted.
Also, it does not take a lot of deep thought to realize that Japan was a mountainous island nation, 80% covered by forests, surrounded by dozens of carrier task forces. Nothing was getting on or off. It was utterly starving. And actually considering the ruined state of the country, the three days between the two bombs was way too soon for an assesment of the damage to Hiroshima to have truly been taken into account before Nagasaki. The fact that surrender took some time probably had more to do with the ludicrous unconditional surrender requirement. As Eisenhower himself said about Axis resistance something like, if choosing to face a hangman's noose or charge a bayonet line, you might as well charge the bayonet line.
Even if we want to pretend that the atomic bombs saved US lives that would not have needed to be thrown away, it may have cost more. Why? We need to look at the history of Russia. When many people in Russia had access to guns, they always rebelled. (One reason the founders wanted an armed populace - a despotic state always wants to restrict weapons to civilians).
So, after the Napoleonic wars, resistance grew up in Russia and ultimately led to some reforms after the failed Decembrist revolt. Then after many had weapons from the Crimean War, serfdom was eliminated. Again after WW1, revolts sprung up, unfortunately this time the Bolsheviks won. (Interestingly enough, during this time, there were thousands of foreign Allied troops, Japanese, American, British, French etc. occupying parts of Russia)
At the end of WW2, revolutions began to spring up against Stalin, but they quietly disappeared after the atomic bombs were dropped. Could these people have feared that only the Kremlin stood between them and another American invasion? Who knows, but how many millions had to die because communism did not come to an end in USSR in 1945-46, and spread throughout much of the world shortly thereafter?
So it is likely not war as a defense of one's home that anybody objects to, it is the unintended consequences that the imperial mindset brings. The simple fact is that Americans as a whole think not like the Founders of our country, but like those who the founders were fighting.
Note: while many of these things are summarized in Richard Maybury's good little book written especially for homeschoolers called WW2: The Rest of the Story, I have put together many of his facts from other sources and others as well. I highly recommend it.
If I rob a bank
and kill people in the process...assuming I declared war on banks would that be an act of war? Just trying to understand the definition of war.
(I guess in doing so I would have forfeited my right to a fair trial or formal charges because I would be able to be held indefinitely as an enemy combatant)
"if you remember right in WW2
"if you remember right in WW2 it was the US's "stay out of it" attitude that allowed things to get so bad"
Mccain made the same ludicrous argument to RP in the GOP pres debate in the 08 race. And I made the same face as RP did in response when I read this. Some say he didn't explain because the MC was trying to restore order and RP is an orderly type of gent. I like to think it was because the inanity of such a statement is difficult to address without dropping a history textbook on the person's head.
Now Japan may or may not have surrendered without the bombs. It's hard to predict and decipher the very different mentality that nation had about war throughout it's history and at that time. Of course it's impossible to tell because we can't go back and do over to see what they'll do. But an irrefutable fact is that the length and breadth of the disaster that was WW2 can NOT in any way shape or form be laid at the feet of the US. Such an accusation would fly in the face of every fact from the beginning of the FIRST world war on. What was it we said about the Treaty of Versailles? I believe it was something along the lines of "This is stupid, you guys are going to regret it, and we'd rather you didn't cry to us to clean up the mess that results because of your lack of foresight." Or something.
what is irrefutable
1st it took the US to end WW2 on 2 fronts. 2nd that the DOD projected 100's of thousands of our soldiers would have been killed if a land invasion of Japan's home island would have taken place. you forget the religious self-sacrificing nature of the Japanese people for their 'god' emperor. 3rd that both of the attacks on Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were acts of war.
the whole reason the US now has an empire is to keep another World War from breaking out. do some history about south eastern Europe sometime. as it was the spark for both world wars. same with the middle east. if the Islamic arab countries ever come together against Israel (which they all call for Israel's total annihilation) WW3 will happen dragging the whole world into it.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
"..the whole reason the US now has an empire is to keep another
World War from breaking out."
Puhleeze, pickle-head. This should read:
"...the whole reason the US now has an empire is to pump money into the military-industrial complex."
Read an article about the anniversary of the bombing of Dresden. A civilian target, as you would know, which became a fiery inferno. Both the incineration of Dresden and the nuking of Japan were for the benefit of the Soviets. The Americans and British knew the Soviets were going to be "a handful" after the war and they wanted to send a clear signal to them as to their capabilities.
BTW, have I told you lately you smell?
: b
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
look around
the world is and has been since WW2 1 step away from chaos. of course that is what the anarchists want. ask Clinton about Bosnia, which is about the same area WW1 & 2 started. What you said about the military complex is like saying the reason i protect my property and family is so i can own guns....hahaha.
umm...didn't the Germans do that to London during the 'blitz' and to our supply ships to the UK & didn't Japan do that to our peaceful Pacific fleet in Pearl Harbor? or did you forget that the Germans & Japan were raping, pillaging, and exterminating along the way? i suppose there were no innocent people in the trade towers complex or the planes at all on 9/11 that didn't want to die that day who had families, friends, and loved ones, just like you and i have. it always amazes me how you guys can just overlook that fact. maybe it is because this generation really cannot relate to someone else being killed like that because they don't want to think about it that way. like i've said before, my grandpa came to the USA after the Germans and Russians took everything he had including his wife and huge farm in the Ukraine after he escaped from a concentration camp when the Russians re-attacked it. it just seems that to some of you 'anti-war' freaks there is no reason for any war for any reason. that tells me those like that are pampered and don't live in reality and don't care enough to be bothered with the responsibility to protect their loved ones (which is a man's duty). my reasoning is the same as the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, peace & tranquility through the knowledge that i will defend myself.
heh, yes you have told me i smell but i took a shower today just for you.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
You're pulling out the same
You're pulling out the same old weak neocon arguments here. Other people doing the wrong thing is not an excuse to commit atrocities in response. The "oh so you hate the poor people who died on 9-11 huh?" crap is five dead horses I am sick and tired of people beating. I live in NYC, I know people who are dead because of that massive failure of "national defense" spending that does everything but actually DEFEND the homeland. If the whole middle east decided to gang up on israel, it would likely be in response to the numerous war crimes israel has committed since its creation by the US. And none of it has anything to do with us. The whole region could go up in flames, Jew and Muslim alike, and it would be absolutely incontrovertibly irrelevant to our national security. You can't be here with us about "Democrat spending" and the Fed and the debt and all without addressing the fact that the vast majority of the money is spent maintaining a mostly useless empire. And if you believe that tattered and shaky empire is the only only thing standing between the entire planet and another huge war, then the planet is hopeless to you anyway and you need to examine why you distrust the human race so much that you think we need to be collectively bullied to prevent disaster. Projection like that is unhealthy.
I Thank God that my country helped Israel!!!
self defense by Israel is not a war crime.
i distrust the human race because...
Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
Rom 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Rom 3:13 Their throat is an open sepulcher; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:
Rom 3:14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:
Rom 3:15 Their feet are swift to shed blood:
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery are in their ways:
Rom 3:17 And the way of peace have they not known:
Rom 3:18 There is no fear of God before their eyes.
Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.
Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
Rom 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
Rom 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
Rom 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Rom 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
i never said you 'hated' the people that died on 9/11...i said you just didn't care. it seems you could watch you neighbor get mugged and his throat cut and you wouldn't lift a finger to do anything about it. yet the arabs can lob rockets into Israel every day and Israel should just take it. why don't you think the Muslims who fire rockets at innocent people should be 'tried for war crimes'? ask a Texan what he would do if the shootings at the boarder spilled over into Texas. you can bet the Mexican shooters would fall silent real quicklike. i'm not a 'neo-con'...do you think all the US boys who fought in WW2 were neo-cons? i'm just not a panzy like you that wouldn't know what a man's responsibility is in protecting his family and friends.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Sorry but marching into a
Sorry but marching into a wasteland with zero rules of engagement and women and children listed officially as targets of opportunity is NOT self defense by any means. One could make the argument that ALL actions by EVERYONE in the mideast are self defense in some way. The more logical argument would be that NONE of them are, and that it's all sword measuring. You can't say that Israel's actions are self defense whilst calling the SAME actions by the people they are fighting the opposite. Logic no work that way. Jews who fire rockets at innocent people are NO DIFFERENT than Muslims who fire rockets at innocent people. If the actions and victims are the same, the action is wrong.
And it is a far step from "not caring about 9-11 victims" to "justifying mass slaughter of people that had nothing to do with 9-11 because you care just so much about 9-11 victims"
And saying I don't care about the friends of mine and even those I did not know who were burned or pulverized to death in those towers is a sick, twisted thing to say.
I distrust even more of those
I distrust even more of those who speak for "god".
Droping two nukes on civilian
Droping two nukes on civilian was the lesser evil? Sure, comparing to all out land invasion only if there were a third or fourth options. To sum it up, your logic is the end justifies the means, correct?
No, my logic is
count the consequences before you attack or do something to harm someone as you may just get more than you bargained for. i guess by your logic you forget about that side of the issue and you seem to think no one should be able to defend themselves or consider the value of the lives of it's citizens or people he is responsible to care for in a time of war. War is and always has been ugly and not desired by anyone, but no man would be considered a good man if he did not defend the lives of those he loves and is responsible to God to care for. That is a man's God given responsibility. Something you have not thought about i guess.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
You are so blind by your own
You are so blind by your own views. How's dropping two nukes on civilian has do with defending love ones? Even for revenge, you could just punish those who committed the offence. You don't think there might be a few Japanese would throw us a few "nukes" if they have the chance. I would not speak too loud if I were you, may wake up those long buried native ghosts.
if you tried that with Japan...
...punishing only those supposedly responsible, let's chose...
1)100,000's of our men would have died by all US projections, to take the entire island.
2) 2 nukes drove them to surrender with no US casualties....
hmmmm...i pick #2. and so did almost all of America.
AND ANOTHER MAJOR POINT YOUR FORGETTING...
ever heard the term "guilt by association"? if Japan had nuked us and took out Philadelphia (the idustrial city that won the whole war almost by itself), and D.C., and we surrendered, do you think Japan's citizens would have agreed with the action? the answer is a resounding YES, because the citizens of Japan would have hailed it's industrial and technical superiority (just like we did). and that superiority comes from the people, everyday citizens.
do some research on just how many people were a part of the "Manhattan Project"(it was not a small number of people). if US citizens thought like you did, then why did they willingly participate in the project??? our citizens were just as responsible for using those nukes they helped design and build as Truman was. the navy and air force delivered them and could have refused the Presidential order at any time. NONE of them refused the order. Truman did not & could never have done it alone. So the blame is not just his, but the whole country.
X
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
So because a lot of people
So because a lot of people think a wrong thing, it must be right? There is just an acre of bad logic in your arguments. If they had done it to us, it would be just as wrong, because exterminating thousands of civilians in what amounts to a few seconds is wrong, no matter who is doing the slaughtering. MASS KILLING OF CIVILIANS = YOUR DOIN IT WRONG
the point that you missed on purpose was...
civilians are a part of a countries 'total war' infrastructure.
2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.