Glenn Beck, the grassroots, and the campaign.

Ron Paul, and his supporters, need to keep away, and/or make a clean break ---from Limbaugh, Hannity, and Glen Beck.

These 'conservatives' entertainers have shown their true colors. They are charlatans of the worst kind, and have tricked the masses to the point of where listeners can't have an original thought. It is called propaganda and brainwashing.

I say this, as someone who listened to Limbaugh in the early 1990's before he became a machine shill. Hannity, I saw through him immediately. Pity more people can't see; however, many eyes are being opened.

I pray more will be opened too. Leave these 'old media' ones behind !

Go forward with new resolve, and let the tricksters wither from their own small minds.

Glen Beck is a nobody who has a bunch of angry, rascist, evangelicals who sell AMWAY, listen to him.
They like authority, and Nazism, so screw em.
We don't need Glenn Beck.
It sounds like Beck needs Paul, and or to trip him up.

Did you all know Glenn Beck's religion is Mormon?

Does, Romney ring a familiar bell with anyone?

went about as well as could be expected. A french kiss topped by a stab in the back .. that is my impression.
Some may differ about this opinion .
Brutus was Caesars adopted son and still stabbed him along with all the others.
Olive Branch? how about a greasy rope ? That is how i saw it. Any serious supporter would not have tried to embarass R.Paul with the absurdities that Glen Beck resorted to with R. Paul .
It is clear to me that in the world of mainstream media pundinsts R.paul has no allies, forget friends.
The style each uses to attack him may differ one from the other but, whether caustic of seemingly friendly either of those aim only to discredit him.
An olive branch extended from Beck is like a slippery rope offered by Hannity if he claimed to be throwing out a life preserver to Ron Paul .
I would Love to see someone of real integrety interview Ron Paul but , i can think of No one in mainstream media that possesses that level of integrety.
So can anything be done? I say yes , let the empty suits talk their garbage , let us bring Ron Paul to the people as we have been doing ..the vote is what matters .

If Ron Paul can stand there in a debate, telling an audience that contains immigrants from Cuba and Venezuela that we need to have relations with those countries, he can go on Glenn Beck. Indeed, Ron Paul was booed. Loudly. But he stood there. Even Rolling Stone wrote how courageous such a thing was.

Who cares if Glenn Beck is not neutral. Being forewarned is being forearmed. Personally, I think Ron Paul will do fine. It's a full hour for goodness sakes. All he gets most of the time on the MSM is a segment, maybe ten minutes.

It's free publicity, and worth a thousand television commercials. Think of the money saved. It's the prudent thing to do. Ron Paul needs the most bang for the buck. Going on Glenn Beck's show will gain exposure.

Oh, and I saw a segment of Ron Paul on Fox. He sat down with Hannity after each Fox News debate. And Ron Paul sounded good. If Ron Paul can out do Hannity, he can out do Beck.

Go on the show Ron Paul! We are sacrificing and donating on December 16th. We are doing our part. Now show us that you care about our money and accept all free publicity so you don't have to spend advertising dollars if you don't have to.

Is that I do not Sleep with the Enemy. Do you go to bed with a rattlesnake?

Not me friend!

Why don't we see if we can get Glenn a ride in the blimp? He has shilling to do for his book, doesn't he? I'm guessing he would welcome any publicity about himself...

Let him see some supporters up close. We aren't terrorists (but he knows that already).

Have we forgotten that Ron Paul has been ignored, laughed at, and ridiculed at the debates, in interviews with other hosts, etc? And yet, he has always managed to deflect and turn around whatever criticism and loaded questions have come his way (e.g. "I take my orders from the Constitution", "Washington didn't change me"). Glenn Beck does what he does to draw an audience and ratings, and he obviously wants Ron Paul on the air because he knows it will benefit his show. So what? The exchange is mutually beneficial as any capitalistic exchange should be.

The opportunity to be on Glenn Beck's show is a gem for the campaign, free exposure, and the opportunity for Dr. Paul to respond to Beck directly and hold him accountable for his own criticisms and concerns. Rarely does Dr. Paul have an opportunity to interview with someone who is already on board with much of his libertarian views (that saves a lot of mindless discussions of irrelevant or redundant topics, i.e. "The View").

Please encourage Dr. Paul and the campaign to take advantage of this opportunity. Have confidence in his ability to stand up to Beck as he has in the debates. With a host and audience who are potentially holding out on Ron Paul merely because of one issue (foreign policy), this is a great opportunity to win them over. I seriously doubt that Dr. Paul could lose support through a Glenn Beck interview.

I've been against Ron Paul going on Glenn Beck's show from the very beginning. I don't think he has extended an "olive branch," because as far as I know he hasn't apologized for implying Ron Paul supporters are "terrorists" or even bothered correcting the inaccuracies in that hit piece.

I'd be willing to bet almost all of Glenn Beck's viewers and listeners have heard of Ron Paul and have already made up their minds about him. Why preach to the choir? Ron Paul would do better to concentrate on new venues like "The View," during which he reached millions of potential women voters, many of who probably didn't know much about him, and now have a good first impression of him.

We don't need Glenn Beck!