Is it Possible that the collapse of Building 1, 2, and 7 were not part of the plan?Submitted by OctoBox on Sat, 02/27/2010 - 20:57
What if they just intended to ram those buildings -- kill a few folks and that's it.
Could they have justified war, stealing the gold, and let natural fire destroy evidence without bringing the whole dayum buildings down?
Yeah -- That would of still been the biggest false-flag in history.
What if (and I know the counter-arguments) the buildings fell by accident, yet the ramming of them was intentional?
It's possible someone in the late 60's early 70's (when they were built -- the era of hyper cheap alloys and automobiles) could of short-sided the specs; now pay-offs on building construction is a known conspiracy -- happens all the time. The Rockerfellers built it!! David and Norman!
A friend who is one of the top mechanical engineers in the U.S (I mean this quite literally) told me he used to "explode" metal at ITT in India (for fun and experiment) during his under-grad studies, and also said that metal is a near perfect conductor of heat.
What if poor building, rediculous structural damage, and Gov't inept False-Flag planning actually did what we saw it do?
Logically they did not need to drop those buildings and kill those people to "justify" war-proliferation.
If they just rammed the buildings it would of been more than enough.
I don't want to "debate" 911-Truth; I'm just suggesting an alternative "thought." Incompitence.